Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 10:41 +0800, Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
>
>> Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>
>>> Hollis Blanchard wrote:
>>>
> I don't know the privious story about this thread, but now I can't
> understand the move. Why do we move all the structure to
>>
On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 10:41 +0800, Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
> Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> >>> I don't know the privious story about this thread, but now I can't
> >>> understand the move. Why do we move all the structure to
> >>> arch-specific ? For IA64 side, almostly we can
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Hollis Blanchard wrote:
>>> I don't know the privious story about this thread, but now I can't
>>> understand the move. Why do we move all the structure to
>>> arch-specific ? For IA64 side, almostly we can reuse them directly,
>>> and just see some special fields as arch-s
Hollis Blanchard wrote:
>> I don't know the privious story about this thread, but now I can't
>> understand the move. Why do we move all the structure to arch-specific ?
>> For IA64 side, almostly we can reuse them directly, and just see some
>> special fields as arch-specific. So, I think, we shou
On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 09:13 +0800, Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
> Jerone Young wrote:
> > # HG changeset patch
> > # User Jerone Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > # Date 1193618330 18000
> > # Node ID 3bf072e498768885ab96b7ccb668b61c96db0e83
> > # Parent a6f7c585fe76f9563fd061cfe3e772532ab27952
> > Move x86
