Zhao Forrest wrote:
>
> When running KVM(kvm.rtl) and xen-HVM(xen.um) on the same machine, I
> feel that the guest OS on top of KVM is much faster responsive than
> the one on top of xen-HVM.
> But this test result showed that xen-HVM is more responsive than KVM.
> Weird. I onced tried KVM-36 and x
James Dykman wrote:
> Dor,
>
> I ran some netperf tests with your PV
> virtio drivers, along with some Xen PV cases
> and a few others for comparison. I thought you
> (and the list) might be interested in the numbers.
>
> I am going to start looking for bottlenecks, unless
> you need help with th
On 10/12/07, James Dykman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dor,
>
> I ran some netperf tests with your PV
> virtio drivers, along with some Xen PV cases
> and a few others for comparison. I thought you
> (and the list) might be interested in the numbers.
>
> I am going to start looking for bottlenecks,
James Dykman wrote:
> Dor,
>
> I ran some netperf tests with your PV
> virtio drivers, along with some Xen PV cases
> and a few others for comparison. I thought you
> (and the list) might be interested in the numbers.
>
>
Thanks for the tests it indeed interesting.
Actually except for a small
Dor,
I ran some netperf tests with your PV
virtio drivers, along with some Xen PV cases
and a few others for comparison. I thought you
(and the list) might be interested in the numbers.
I am going to start looking for bottlenecks, unless
you need help with the new hypercall updates.
I'll re-run
