Re: [kvm-devel] Problems with MAC address with e1000 on Windows 2003

2008-04-23 Thread Michael Lilie (mlilie)
I think 00 is pretty much the standard starting byte for MAC addresses. I've seen the same problem - for KVM 61-65, with a 2.6.23 host kernel. Fedora8, Windows 2008 see the MAC address correctly with an e1000 interface. But in Windows 2003 with e1000, the last four bytes of the MAC address are a

Re: [kvm-devel] Problems with MAC address with e1000 on Windows 2003

2008-04-23 Thread Alberto Treviño
On Wednesday 23 April 2008 01:05:50 am Alexey Eremenko wrote: > Do not start MAC address with 00: 01: or FF: > Those are illegal addresses. > > Try 50: or 52: or something Thanks for the tip. I tried those but the same problem persisted. As I played around with several MAC addresses (even t

Re: [kvm-devel] Problems with MAC address with e1000 on Windows 2003

2008-04-23 Thread Alexey Eremenko
Do not start MAC address with 00: 01: or FF: Those are illegal addresses. Try 50: or 52: or something - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's stil

[kvm-devel] Problems with MAC address with e1000 on Windows 2003

2008-04-22 Thread Alberto Treviño
I was wondering if anyone could reproduce my problem. If it is reproduceable, then I'll file a bug. I am using e1000 ethernet adapters on Windows 2003 and Linux guests. The line to set it up is something like this: -net nic,vlan=1,macaddr=00:ff:21:cf:91:01,model=e1000 \ -net tap,vlan=1,