Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] use NR_IRQS for irq count

* On Wednesday 09 Apr 2008 17:41:10 Glauber Costa wrote: > Amit Shah wrote: > > * On Tuesday 08 April 2008 22:34:36 Glauber Costa wrote: > >> Instead of artificially limiting irq numbers, use arch provided NR_IRQS > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Thanks, applied. >

Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] use NR_IRQS for irq count

Amit Shah wrote: > * On Tuesday 08 April 2008 22:34:36 Glauber Costa wrote: >> Instead of artificially limiting irq numbers, use arch provided NR_IRQS >> >> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Thanks, applied. > > Going forward, we're going to use the in-kernel approach for inter

Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] use NR_IRQS for irq count

* On Tuesday 08 April 2008 22:34:36 Glauber Costa wrote: > Instead of artificially limiting irq numbers, use arch provided NR_IRQS > > Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thanks, applied. Going forward, we're going to use the in-kernel approach for interrupt injection (which already