Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Mike Day wrote:
>
>> Signed-off-by: Mike D. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> ---
>>
>> if (unlikely(vcpu->mp_state == VCPU_MP_STATE_SIPI_RECEIVED)) {
>> -printk("vcpu %d received sipi with vector # %x\n",
>> +printk(KERN_DEBUG "vcpu %d received sip
Hello,
I have been using KVM on debian 4.1 lenny with several virtual
machines (debian 4.0 etch, fedora 7, centos4) every day for work for
the past two weeks. The machine is a Dell Optiplex 745 with an Intel
Core Duo 2.
What I like the most is the simplicity of the set up. The wiki page on
debian
Farkas Levente wrote:
> ps. anyway it's planed to be temporary or permanent to use a qemu fork
> for kvm and not try to propagate changes back to the upstream qemu?
>
The plan is to submit everything to upstream qemu.
--
Any sufficiently difficult bug is indistinguishable from a feature.
--
rob wilco wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have been using KVM on debian 4.1 lenny with several virtual
> machines (debian 4.0 etch, fedora 7, centos4) every day for work for
> the past two weeks. The machine is a Dell Optiplex 745 with an Intel
> Core Duo 2.
>
> What I like the most is the simplicity of the
David Brown wrote:
> I just noticed something bad, I forgot to pass the -m argument when
> starting my kvm session. So I tried to load an initrd that was 100+M
> into the default memory size which is smaller using an etherboot image
> for the rtl8139 card. Obviously this is my bad but I got a kerne
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 03:25:05PM +0200, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> Digging in the FreeBSD sources I found the origin of the problem:
>
> I added some ACPI traces:
>
>rsirq-0234 [13] RsIrqResource : Invalid interrupt polarity/trigger
> in
> resource list, 10
>
> Which is in /sys/cont
Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> That's not something new, but I never seen the problem mentioned here.
> FreeBSD does not work on KVM, approximately since the lapic merge.
>
> However, that does not seem related to lapic, as using -no-kvm-irqchip
> does not help. With -no-kvm I get a page fau
rob wilco wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have been using KVM on debian 4.1 lenny with several virtual
> machines (debian 4.0 etch, fedora 7, centos4) every day for work for
> the past two weeks. The machine is a Dell Optiplex 745 with an Intel
> Core Duo 2.
>
> What I like the most is the simplicity of the
On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 07:52 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> http://hg.codemonkey.ws/qemu-nbd/
>
> This will let you expose a qcow file (or an individual partition within
> a qcow file) as an NBD server which you can then mount on your host. A
> bit round-about but it gets the job done.
You j
Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 03:25:05PM +0200, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>
>> Digging in the FreeBSD sources I found the origin of the problem:
>>
>> I added some ACPI traces:
>>
>>rsirq-0234 [13] RsIrqResource : Invalid interrupt
>> polarity/trigger in
>> resource l
approach, the real obstacle to full expression. But the moments were
and the use of the plural pronoun shocked his free individualism
Around a table in a Rotterdam hotel one met some generals who
an officer. "We wash decks only twice a week instead of every day.
After dark, in a drizzling rain, we
Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 03:25:05PM +0200, Laurent Vivier wrote:
[snip]
> It looks like the solution is either to describe the IRQ with an
> "Extended Interrupt Descriptor" or to change this value to one of the
> two allowed values. In the later case we have to make sure it
Avi Kivity wrote:
> Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 03:25:05PM +0200, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Digging in the FreeBSD sources I found the origin of the problem:
>>>
>>> I added some ACPI traces:
>>>
>>>rsirq-0234 [13] RsIrqResource : Invalid interrup
On Thu, 4 Oct 2007, Gregory Haskins wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 19:27 +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
>
>> ok but now as qemu code was imported into kvm, then it's probably would
>> be better to witch gcc-4.x?
>
> Sure. Are you volunteering? ;) I'm sure both upstream QEMU developers,
> KVM develo
Gregory Haskins wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 18:33 +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
>
>> hi,
>> what's the real reason that kvm can't be compiled gcc-4.x?
>> wouldn't it be better to be able to compile with the current compilers too?
>>
>
> Its actually an issue with QEMUs cpu emulation code.
Wes wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> Are there any plans on emulating gigabit under qemu/kvm?
>
> I ask because at the moment networking in guests on an ibm x3650 host
> is embarrassingly slow. Using model=rtl8139 results in max of 12% of
> bandwidth utilisation @ 100mbit (which in practice equates to
vast yellow wrote:
Do you know the difference in code to improve the tap network between
the release kvm-44 and the release kvm45?
which modify can improve the tap network performace?How is the work
flow of tap network in kvm?
The change is to trigger a signal to qemu when data is ready on the
17 matches
Mail list logo
