[kvm-devel] KVM migration problem on Ubuntu

2008-02-09 Thread Kay Hayen
missing. Yours, Kay Hayen - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ __

Re: [kvm-devel] KVM migration problem on Ubuntu

2008-02-10 Thread Kay Hayen
Hello Uri, thanks for the reply, that is going to work for me. I am indeed trying to: > Just to be clear, are you trying to upgrade you host or your guest (VM) ? Yes. > Please specify your Host CPU/OS and your guest OS. Ubuntu Hardy Development as Host, Ubuntu Gutsy as Minimal, kernel "linu

[kvm-devel] Guest Time Question

2007-10-04 Thread Kay Hayen
clock=pit would help, but that seemed to be no change. Can you please point me to what to do? Best regards, Kay Hayen - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.

Re: [kvm-devel] Guest Time Question

2007-10-06 Thread Kay Hayen
Hello, tanks you for the reply: Am Freitag 05 Oktober 2007 08:35:44 schrieb Izik Eidus: > Kay Hayen wrote: > > So in FAQ and Wiki I didn't find how to make the guest use host time. Is > > that possible at all? For VMWare it is said that clock=pit would help, > > but t

Re: [kvm-devel] Guest Time Question

2007-10-11 Thread Kay Hayen
gether in paravirtualization with KVM. Also I would not be sure what a 0.1% shift would be. From what do you mean the percentage? Or is that a typo and you would mean 0.1 ms ? Best regards, Kay Hayen > > So in FAQ and Wiki I didn't find how to make the guest use > > host time.

Re: [kvm-devel] Guest Time Question

2007-10-13 Thread Kay Hayen
make correct estimates about current position, the current time and the observation time must be compared, and errors in the current time easily will lead to an error in the range of miles. Best regards, Kay Hayen - This

Re: [kvm-devel] Guest Time Question

2007-10-16 Thread Kay Hayen
Hello Eddie, Am Montag 15 Oktober 2007 06:13:44 schrieb Dong, Eddie: > >That 0.1% kills me though. do you mean, that every 1 second, 1 > >will be 1ms > >off? And for every second thereafter, leaving me with 1 second > >drift after > >only 1000 seconds? > > Oh, that is not my intension :-( > I jus