Add bsf/bsr instruction emulation (opcode 0x0f 0xbc~0xbd)
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun yj...@cn.fujitsu.com
---
arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c | 28 ++--
1 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
index
This patch add test for bsf/bsr instruction.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjunyj...@cn.fujitsu.com
---
x86/emulator.c | 64
1 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/x86/emulator.c b/x86/emulator.c
index aef5d90..348d548
Hi all!
I have understood that in addition to support from the kernel and
qemu-kvm, there must be support in libc. So in testing I was doing on
Lenny, it did not work using libc from Debian repositories. Now that
squeeze is frozen, anyone knows if it will support KSM?
Has anyone had success
09.08.2010 14:16, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
Hi all!
I have understood that in addition to support from the kernel and
qemu-kvm, there must be support in libc. So in testing I was doing on
Lenny, it did not work using libc from Debian repositories. Now that
squeeze is frozen, anyone knows if it will
Hi,
I don't have clue what glibc is contained in debian, but it seems
to me that at least compile-time KSM support DOES depend on glibc.
I'm using RHEL5-based system and KSM support doesn't get compiled in
by default.
But since I use new kernel, I add following to CFLAGS while compiling
qemu-kvm
09.08.2010 15:00, Nikola Ciprich пишет:
Hi,
I don't have clue what glibc is contained in debian, but it seems
to me that at least compile-time KSM support DOES depend on glibc.
I'm using RHEL5-based system and KSM support doesn't get compiled in
by default.
For KSM to be compiled in, one need
On Monday, 09 August 2010 14:27:12 +0400,
Michael Tokarev wrote:
I have understood that in addition to support from the kernel and
qemu-kvm, there must be support in libc. So in testing I was doing on
Lenny, it did not work using libc from Debian repositories. Now that
squeeze is frozen,
On Monday, 09 August 2010 13:00:49 +0200,
Nikola Ciprich wrote:
Hi,
Hi, Nikola.
I don't have clue what glibc is contained in debian, but it seems
to me that at least compile-time KSM support DOES depend on glibc.
I'm using RHEL5-based system and KSM support doesn't get compiled in
by
09.08.2010 18:27, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
On Monday, 09 August 2010 14:27:12 +0400,
Michael Tokarev wrote:
I have understood that in addition to support from the kernel and
qemu-kvm, there must be support in libc. So in testing I was doing on
Lenny, it did not work using libc from Debian
On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 12:28 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 08/04/2010 10:13 AM, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
mmu_shrink() should attempt to free @nr_to_scan entries.
This conflicts with Dave's patchset.
Dave, what's going on with those patches? They're starting to smell.
The hardware and test
If we can't install the client using the autotest internal
package management system, give the user a less intimidating
message, after all we'll fall back to use other methods to
install the client.
Signed-off-by: Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues l...@redhat.com
---
server/autotest.py |7 +++
1
Just wondering if KVM supports (if not now then will it in future releases) the
following:
- Credit-Based CPU Scheduling like Xen. I tried the following command using
RHEL 5.5 and it does not work:
$ virsh schedinfo RHEL5u3-tomcat
Scheduler : Unknown
error: this function is not supported
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 04:33:46PM -0400, Michael Li wrote:
Just wondering if KVM supports (if not now then will it in future releases)
the following:
- Credit-Based CPU Scheduling like Xen. I tried the following command using
RHEL 5.5 and it does not work:
$ virsh schedinfo
Try removing ifname=tap0 and a different macaddr for second instance.
--Nirmal
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 7:09 AM, Anjali Kulkarni anj...@juniper.net wrote:
Hi,
I can start my freebsd based image in Qemu, and I use tap interface for
connectivity to the host or external world, but when I try to
On 08/08/2010 11:34 PM, Wei Yongjun wrote:
If bit offset operands is a negative number, BitOp instruction
will return wrong value. This patch fix it.
Thanks, applied all three patches.
--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.
--
On 08/08/2010 03:24 PM, Mohammed Gamal wrote:
This adds a wrapper function inject_realmode_interrupt() around the
emulator function emulate_int_real() to allow real mode interrupt injection.
Signed-off-by: Mohammed Gamalm.gamal...@gmail.com
---
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 14 ++
On 08/08/2010 03:24 PM, Mohammed Gamal wrote:
Signed-off-by: Mohammed Gamalm.gamal...@gmail.com
---
arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 11 +--
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
index 652d317..d6cb7eb 100644
---
On 08/09/2010 06:00 AM, Wei Yongjun wrote:
Add bsf/bsr instruction emulation (opcode 0x0f 0xbc~0xbd)
@@ -3464,6 +3464,30 @@ twobyte_insn:
btc: /* btc */
emulate_2op_SrcV_nobyte(btc, c-src, c-dst, ctxt-eflags);
break;
+ case 0xbc: {
On 08/08/2010 11:09 AM, Nadav Har'El wrote:
+page table (with bypass_guest_pf disabled).
Might as well remove this, since nvmx will not be merged with such a
gaping hole.
In theory I ought to reject anything that doesn't comply with the spec.
In practice I'll accept deviations from the
On 08/09/10 15:51, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
- Modify VM's Disk Size
qemu-img can copy disks, resizing as it does it. For raw disks
just dd extra sace onto the end of it (with a suitable seek= param
to avoid killing your existing data :-)
Daniel
New versions of qemu-img have a 'resize'
Add bsf/bsr instruction emulation (opcode 0x0f 0xbc~0xbd)
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun yj...@cn.fujitsu.com
---
v1 - v2: use 'u8 zf' instead of int.
---
arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c | 28 ++--
1 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
21 matches
Mail list logo
