[libreoffice-l10n] Re: [ANNOUNCE] LibreOffice 3.5 beta0 translation

2011-11-29 Thread Andras Timar
Hi, I pushed translations yesterday morning to git. I fixed a few fatal errors in git only, so build won't break on them, but please fix these problems in Pootle, too (and check for at least 'xmltags' errors regularly). Languages with fatal errors: da, pt, pt-BR, tr, zh-CN. Please check all bugs

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [ANNOUNCE] LibreOffice 3.5 beta0 translation

2011-11-29 Thread Olivier Hallot
Hello Andras If I recall correctly (my memory may fail), I used to locate a string in pootle with the the par_id number... as in helpcontent2source\text\scalc\01\04060120.xhp 0 help par_id4146942 It was precise and straightforward. No mistake. However, now, this number

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [ANNOUNCE] LibreOffice 3.5 beta0 translation

2011-11-29 Thread Dean Lee
Hi, Andras Timar, *, On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Andras Timar tima...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I pushed translations yesterday morning to git. I fixed a few fatal errors in git only, so build won't break on them, but please fix these problems in Pootle, too (and check for at least 'xmltags'

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] [ANNOUNCE] LibreOffice 3.5 beta0 translation

2011-11-29 Thread Sérgio Marques
2011/11/29 Andras Timar tima...@gmail.com Hi Sergio, 2011/11/28 Sérgio Marques smarque...@gmail.com: 2011/11/26 Andras Timar tima...@gmail.com Hi, I updated Pootle with the latest templates. I'll push your translations for LibreOffice 3.5 beta0 Sunday night or Monday. If you

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [ANNOUNCE] LibreOffice 3.5 beta0 translation

2011-11-29 Thread Sérgio Marques
2011/11/29 Andras Timar tima...@gmail.com Hi, I pushed translations yesterday morning to git. I fixed a few fatal errors in git only, so build won't break on them, but please fix these problems in Pootle, too (and check for at least 'xmltags' errors regularly). Languages with fatal

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [ANNOUNCE] LibreOffice 3.5 beta0 translation

2011-11-29 Thread Lior Kaplan
https://liorkaplan.wordpress.com/2011/11/29/translation-status-for-libreoffice-3-5-0-beta0/ On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Andras Timar tima...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I pushed translations yesterday morning to git. I fixed a few fatal errors in git only, so build won't break on them, but

[libreoffice-l10n] How to Unsubscribe - translation

2011-11-29 Thread Florian Effenberger
Hello, at http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ we have a nice and convenient documentation what to do in case unsubscription to one of the lists is unsuccessful. I think it makes sense to have that page localized into various languages. As soon as you have

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [ANNOUNCE] LibreOffice 3.5 beta0 translation

2011-11-29 Thread Lior Kaplan
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Andras Timar tima...@gmail.com wrote: 2011/11/29 Lior Kaplan kaplanl...@gmail.com: https://liorkaplan.wordpress.com/2011/11/29/translation-status-for-libreoffice-3-5-0-beta0/ I presume you used Pootle stats, not actual stats, so Slovenian (100% !) ,

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [ANNOUNCE] LibreOffice 3.5 beta0 translation

2011-11-29 Thread Olivier Hallot
Hi Andras Scratching my head and testing more, I found a weird behaviour with pootle search facility. The first search of a bad word works correctly, it returns a list of matches. On each element I change the bad word to a good word and submit. But I want now to redo the search with the

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [ANNOUNCE] LibreOffice 3.5 beta0 translation

2011-11-29 Thread Andras Timar
Hi Olivier, 2011/11/29 Olivier Hallot olivier.hal...@documentfoundation.org: So, it appears (IMHO) the search is done in a sort of data cache, but the matches are taken from the database. Lokks like a synch is missing there. Could it be? Yes, I'm sure that generation of search indexes does

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [ANNOUNCE] LibreOffice 3.5 beta0 translation

2011-11-29 Thread Anton Meixome
24 hours, more or less 2011/11/29 Andras Timar tima...@gmail.com: Hi Olivier, 2011/11/29 Olivier Hallot olivier.hal...@documentfoundation.org: So, it appears (IMHO) the search is done in a sort of data cache, but the matches are taken from the database. Lokks like a synch is missing there.