Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [libreoffice-l10n] n’t → n't

2014-12-01 Thread Sophie
Hi all, Le 30/11/2014 23:32, Christian Lohmaier a écrit : Hi Olivier, *, On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 10:16 PM, Olivier Hallot olivier.hal...@libreoffice.org wrote: On 30/11/2014 18:52, Rimas Kudelis wrote: 2014.11.30 19:13, Olivier Hallot wrote: painless migration was my hope when I raised

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] n’t → n't

2014-12-01 Thread Yury Tarasievich
On 12/01/2014 01:11 PM, Christian Lohmaier wrote: On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 5:58 AM, Yury Tarasievich yury.tarasiev...@gmail.com wrote: On 11/30/2014 11:52 PM, Rimas Kudelis wrote: And why is not anyone (besides me) discussing automation, of that same problem, too? Probably because there is

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [libreoffice-l10n] n’t → n't

2014-12-01 Thread Rimas Kudelis
Hi Christian, 2014.12.01 00:32, Christian Lohmaier wrote: On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 10:16 PM, Olivier Hallot olivier.hal...@libreoffice.org wrote: On 30/11/2014 18:52, Rimas Kudelis wrote: 2014.11.30 19:13, Olivier Hallot wrote: painless migration was my hope when I raised the issue, but

[libreoffice-l10n] Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [libreoffice-l10n] n’t → n't

2014-12-01 Thread Mihkel Tõnnov
2014-12-01 20:38 GMT+02:00 Rimas Kudelis r...@akl.lt: It would for example also be possible to have master project in pootle (instead of just for the release-branches), so that the amount of changes are incremental, and not all one or two months before a new major release. (but that of

[libreoffice-l10n] Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [libreoffice-l10n] n’t → n't

2014-11-30 Thread Yury Tarasievich
On 11/30/2014 11:23 AM, Rimas Kudelis wrote: 2014.11.30 07:38, Yury Tarasievich rašė: ... And if you use Windows and want to make inputting these characters even more convenient, you can always customize your keyboard layout adding missing typographical symbols to the AltGr (or any other)

[libreoffice-l10n] Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [libreoffice-l10n] n’t → n't

2014-11-30 Thread Yury Tarasievich
On 11/30/2014 12:07 PM, Yury Tarasievich wrote: ... What's strictly incorrect in straight apostrophe, anyway? ... Anyway, here's an idea for you guys about to suffer from this: diff the en_US source before and after apostrophe nice-fication, then create a program which looks at the

[libreoffice-l10n] Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [libreoffice-l10n] n’t → n't

2014-11-30 Thread Yury Tarasievich
On 11/30/2014 02:33 PM, Jesper Hertel wrote: Just because you do not like an idea or are afraid of its consequences there is no reason to shoot it down with sarcasm or other violent methods. That is never helpful. Oh dear. What to do then, if one doesn't like the idea and does NOT in fact

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] n’t → n't

2014-11-30 Thread jonathon
On 30/11/14 12:58, Jesper Hertel wrote: But how come we would have to retranslate? It shows up as untranslated, and the only way to change the status is to retranslate it, even if that retranslation is nothing more than a mouse click approving the existing translation. to find a solution to

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [libreoffice-l10n] n’t → n't

2014-11-30 Thread Akerbeltz.org
I like Oliver's idea. That way, en-US can change its caps, commas, typos, formatted vs non-formatted typography on a daily basis to their heart's content without kicking the rest of the planet into the neolithic, l10n-wise. If I may point out the commercial angle on this - I charge $35 an hour

[libreoffice-l10n] n’t → n't

2014-11-29 Thread Jesper Hertel
Here is a request for a small adjustment in five English strings. Almost all places in LibreOffice, straight apostrophes (', ASCII code 39 decimal) are used in n't endings like don't in the English strings. It is used 209 places in version 4.4. But there are five places where the character ’

[libreoffice-l10n] Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [libreoffice-l10n] n’t → n't

2014-11-29 Thread Adolfo Jayme Barrientos
2014-11-29 15:05 GMT-06:00 Mihkel Tõnnov said Typographically speaking, ’ *is* the correct character. The use of so-called straight or typewriter apostrophes (and quotes) in computing is basically restricting oneself to a limitation that is no longer justified in Unicode-age. So in my view,

[libreoffice-l10n] Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [libreoffice-l10n] n’t → n't

2014-11-29 Thread Yury Tarasievich
On 11/30/2014 05:13 AM, Adolfo Jayme Barrientos wrote: ... In case you guys didn’t know, Apple [1], Microsoft [2] and GNOME [3] are all recommending the use of typographical apostrophes and quotation marks, among other characters that have been historically ... Said recommendations, while

[libreoffice-l10n] Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [libreoffice-l10n] n’t → n't

2014-11-29 Thread Adolfo Jayme Barrientos
2014-11-29 23:38 GMT-06:00 Yury Tarasievich said: Said recommendations, while formaly correct, are subverted by the fact that there are no commonly accessible methods to keyboard-input all those fancy glyphs. Wrong. OS X and Linux distros include punctuation (which is not “fancy” at all)