Re: [L2switch-dev] [OpenDaylight Discuss] ODL l2switch flow entries - reactive flows

Hi Thushar, see my answers below... > On Dec 2, 2018, at 10:20 PM, Thushar Prakash > wrote: > > Hi, > > I am new to ODL and I couldn't find a users mailing list. I hope this is the > right one. > > I was trying to do an experiment with the ODL controller and mininet. I > needed reactive

Re: [L2switch-dev] Compilation errors in loopremover

Hi Sameer, AFAIK l2switch project has been discontinued after oxygen release, so I would suggest you build that branch instead of master: git checkout stable/oxygen BR/Luis > On Sep 9, 2018, at 9:45 PM, Sameer Mainkar wrote: > > Hi L2-Switch Dev Team, > > Can some one please provide

Re: [L2switch-dev] L2SWitch configuration via RESTConf

hFeatureRequest/Response. This means, > topology needs to be destroyed and start fresh one. > Which one suppose to be? > > Thanks > suresh. > > On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 9:50 PM Luis Gomez <mailto:ece...@gmail.com>> wrote: > AFAIR if you do not restart you will

Re: [L2switch-dev] L2SWitch configuration via RESTConf

AFAIR if you do not restart you will have to reconnect all the switches over to get the new flows. > On Aug 27, 2018, at 4:19 AM, knet solutions wrote: > > Hi, > > Do i need to restart the controller, if i modify the L2 Switch config > parameter via RESTCONF? > > 1) > In the document >

Re: [L2switch-dev] [openflowplugin-dev] [release] Carbon SR4 - stable/carbon branch locked

pening in any other branch where the above patch is already merged. BR/Luis > On Apr 25, 2018, at 9:15 AM, Luis Gomez <ece...@gmail.com> wrote: > > FYI I have just detected a recent feature conflict in Carbon through this > job: > > https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng

Re: [L2switch-dev] [openflowplugin-dev] [release] Carbon SR4 - stable/carbon branch locked

FYI I have just detected a recent feature conflict in Carbon through this job: https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/openflowplugin-csit-1node-flow-services-all-carbon/ It seems like when

Re: [L2switch-dev] [opendaylight-dev] Multiple l2 network topology

I think this scenario should work, can you please post all the flows in the switches for this scenario? > On Mar 8, 2018, at 10:30 AM, Jamo Luhrsen wrote: > > +l2switch-dev which hopefully can help. > > On 3/8/18 10:21 AM, Sofia Marques wrote: >> Hello. >> >> I'm running

Re: [L2switch-dev] [controller-dev][l2switch] Regarding link discovery

ookie=0x2b23, duration=77972.554s, table=0, n_packets=0, > n_bytes=0, priority=2,in_port=2 actions=output:1,CONTROLLER:65535 > cookie=0x2b01, duration=78057.189s, table=0, n_packets=0, > n_bytes=0, priority=0 actions=drop > > Regards, > Amit > > >

Re: [L2switch-dev] [opendaylight][l2switch] l2switch not sending MAC-to-MAC based flows

I think MAC-to-MAC flows (in default flood mode) are created when source and destination MAC are in the same switch. Your topology (linear,3) has only 1 host per switch. BR/Luis > On Mar 29, 2017, at 2:16 AM, Amit Kumar wrote: > > Hi All, > > I have downloaded and

Re: [L2switch-dev] [openflowplugin-dev] openflowplugin blocker bug

Just remind this issue is not really critical but it is set as blocker because there is a change of behavior (small regression) from Beryllium to Boron. From this perspective I think it is OK to defer the fix for this to SR3 if both projects agree on that. BR/Luis > On Dec 8, 2016, at 10:18

Re: [L2switch-dev] [openflowplugin-dev] l2switch blocker bug

disconnection. > If we don't see any existing addresses in data tree, we can confirm the cause > of the issue. > > [1] https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/47186/ > <https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/47186/> > > > > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 5:02

Re: [L2switch-dev] [openflowplugin-dev] Blocker bug analysis

? maybe the application fails to identify these ports as going switch-to-switch? BR/Luis > On Oct 19, 2016, at 7:42 AM, Luis Gomez <ece...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Timer=600 sec but in Boron when we leave just 2 secs between mininet stop & > start, we do not see any IP address, a

Re: [L2switch-dev] [openflowplugin-dev] Blocker bug analysis

am trying to clean up/repair the test here: https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/47095/ BR/Luis > On Oct 18, 2016, at 10:02 AM, Luis Gomez <ece...@gmail.com> wrote: > > There are definitely weird things going on in l2switch, the first ERROR you > mention produces some we

Re: [L2switch-dev] [openflowplugin-dev] Blocker bug analysis

log.html.gz BR/Luis > On Oct 14, 2016, at 2:26 PM, Luis Gomez <ece...@gmail.com> wrote: > > OK Tomas, I will try your patch > https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/46390/ on > l2switch-csit-1node-switch-only-carbon and let you know. > > >> On Oct 14, 2016, at 1:2

Re: [L2switch-dev] [openflowplugin-dev] Blocker bug analysis

itch-csit-1node-switch-only-carbon/ > Od: Tomáš Slušný <tomas.slu...@pantheon.tech> > Odoslané: 14. októbra 2016 22:13 > Komu: Luis Gomez; Abhijit Kumbhare > Kópia: An Ho; openflowplugin-dev; OpenDayLight-L2switch-Dev > Predmet: Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [L2switch-dev] Blocker bug

Re: [L2switch-dev] Reg: Need a script file to install flow from northbound interface to controller.

: > > Hello Luis Gomez, > > Good day to you. > > We need a clarification about bulk flows install in single REST request. > > Based on the the script(odl_tester.py) , we observed that the difference > between the "single flow install in single REST request" a

Re: [L2switch-dev] Reg: Need a script file to install flow from northbound interface to controller.

t; On Aug 15, 2016, at 12:30 AM, Luis Gomez <ece...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Selvakumar, > > The odl_tester.py script supports a parameter called -fpr that indicates how > many flows you want to configure in a single REST request. The format is very > simple: > >

Re: [L2switch-dev] [Suspected Spam] Re: [integration-dev] Reg: Need a script file to install flow from northbound interface to controller.

Cluster_Reconcilliation_Multi_DPN.robot > > Thanks > Sanjib > > From: integration-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org > [mailto:integration-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org] On Behalf Of > Selvakumar Murugasekaran > Sent: 08 August 2016 13:1

Re: [L2switch-dev] Reg: Need a script file to install flow from northbound interface to controller.

"type": 2048 } }, "ipv4-destination": "10.0.10.0/24" }, "priority": 2, "table_id": 0 } ] } BR/Luis > On Aug 8, 2016, at 12:41 AM, Selvakumar Murugasekaran > <

Re: [L2switch-dev] [integration-dev] Help on L2 Switch and Mininet Vagrant Box

> > 6. Ping all the hosts. > > > > It is working fine if I log inside the Vagrant Box and build a network. It > > gives an issue when I am trying to do it remotely through a Python script. > > > > Best Regards, > > > > Girish Sukhatankar > > Gradua

Re: [L2switch-dev] Reg: Need a script file to install flow from northbound interface to controller.

Sure, here are our controller NB scripts: https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/gitweb?p=integration/test.git;a=tree;f=tools/odl-mdsal-clustering-tests/clustering-performance-test And some info:

Re: [L2switch-dev] [controller-dev] ODL l2switch

Yes, it is called Loopremover: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/L2_Switch:Beryllium:User_Guide BR/Luis > On May 12, 2016, at 1:46 PM, Zhang Tianzhu wrote: > > Dear all, I have a question about the ODL l2Switch applicaion. Assume that > host 1 sends a icmp request

Re: [L2switch-dev] L2switch Li issues

Fail > Case 3: Current L2 switch (should point to OFP-He) & OFP with patch (should > point to OFP-Li) --> Should Fail > Case 4: L2 switch with patch (should point to OFP-Li) & OFP with patch > (should point to OFP-Li) --> Should Pass > > > > Regards

[L2switch-dev] L2switch Li issues

From today’s l2switch call, I got action point to run system test on Li patch [1]: https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/l2switch/job/l2switch-csit-1node-switch-only-boron/291/robot/report/log.html From the result above we can observe following issues: - Flow push: There is no LLDP

Re: [L2switch-dev] @git.opendaylight.org

/karaf > and I see that mdsal, odlparent, and openflowplugin already installed to > karaf. > The problem: It could not be connected to mininet. ? > I tried connecting minninet with pre-built version of ODL and it works fine. > > > > Best Regards, > Walid > &

Re: [L2switch-dev] @git.opendaylight.org

ion "official" distribution > opendaylight) where can I download l2switch. > > Thank you > -- > Walid > > > From: Luis Gomez <ece...@gmail.com> > To: Walid Aljoby <walid_alj...@yahoo.com>; OpenDayLight-L2switch-Dev > <l2switch-dev@lists.opendaylight

Re: [L2switch-dev] [Action Needed] L2SWITCH Beryllium SR1 Distribution Test Failures

First analysis throws l2switch breaks when loaded with many other features. This is only happening in the SR1 version so further investigation is required. I do not think it is blocker though. > On Mar 18, 2016, at 2:40 PM, An Ho wrote: > > Hi L2SWITCH Team, > > There are

Re: [L2switch-dev] L2SWITCH Test Failures

By looking at the sporadic failures in this test: https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/l2switch-csit-1node-switch-only-stable-lithium/ https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/l2switch-csit-1node-switch-all-stable-lithium/