In a message dated 8/6/07 9:56:27 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Hello Jeri and everybody,
> I am totaly confused, where do you see textile art here:
>
> www.fiberarts.comGo to Back Issues for Summer 2007.
>
> there are, for me , only two handwoven pieces to see. The r
Hello Jeri and everybody,
I am totaly confused, where do you see textile art here:
www.fiberarts.comGo to Back Issues for Summer 2007.
there are, for me , only two handwoven pieces to see. The rest is
painting and other crafts/arts.
Ilske
-
To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] c
In a message dated 8/1/07 7:09:58 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
> Yes, I think that by making a traditional design big, it becomes
> contemporary.
>
> The recent Radical lace exhibit at the Museum of Arts and Design featured a
>
> lot of things that were, for instance,
Jane writes:
The question there would be that if we took a traditional design, and
enlarged it way beyond the original design purpose, would it be
considered contemporary? Even the use of colour isn't new, as the old
pattern books show
Yes, I think that by making a traditional design big,
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, the Mouzons
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>The first time came after reading an article in the May/June 1986 issue
>of the IOLI bulletin about Robin Lewis and a piece of lace she was
>commisioned to make for the Tennesee Valley Authority. It is a torchon
>design, bu
Aurelia wrote:
/OK, we might have to stop fretting about the definition of
"modern/contemporary" and start to fret about a definition of lace/
Personal taste will always play a big part in choosing lace pieces, and
personal taste is changeable. I was reading something on an art
gallery's webs
