[lace] Tebbs' Art of Bobbin Lace Reprint

2006-08-30 Thread Patsy A. Goodman
Hi, Speaking of this book take a look at the last drawing, in the book. It's a picture of eight ladies making lace. Seems the artist got very lazy and didn't want to draw all the bobbins on the lace pillows. Especially the lady's in the front had very few bobbins to make that wide lace

[lace] RE: Tebbs

2006-08-30 Thread Jane Atkinson
The answer to your different sets of sheets in the Tebbs book is that set A goes with The Art of Bobbin Lace, which has the opera bag on the cover but only goes up to page 111; set B is from Supplement to The Art of Bobbin Lace, which continues on from page 115 to 184. When I checked, I found

[lace] Re: Twisted Threads (was Wonderful thread)

2006-08-30 Thread Jenny De Angelis
I have just sorted through my box of cotton threads and found part of a spool of the Brok thread on a spool that I mentioned was hopelessly twisted, I hadn't thrown it all away as I thought. It is Brok 100/3. If I pull a length of thread off the spool and hold the two ends together leaving

Re: [lace] Tebbs' Art of Bobbin Lace Reprint

2006-08-30 Thread Lorri Ferguson
That is the 'picture/drawing' that is on the dust cover of my smaller book. All of the laces are very wide for the pillow size, and several are coming off the side of the pillow. Maybe they are Red Hat gals, those are really 'special' hats to be wearing to a lace school. Lorri - Original

[lace] Fw: wonderfil thread

2006-08-30 Thread Whitham
Thanks to all who replyed to me about the wonderfil thread, I don't think it is worth the frustration of working with it, I will put it with my sewing threads. As Bev pointed it out it is very slippy and I don't think I will be happy with the end result. To try and wind bobbins backwards and in

Re: [lace] PieceWork Magazine

2006-08-30 Thread Scotlace
My thanks to all who replied in answer to my query. Today was the first that I was able to return to my newsagent. The very efficient lady phoned the wholesaler again on my behalf and was told very firmly that it is no longer available in the UK. To use the expression of a lace friend Rude

[lace] Butterflies and Moths by Ulrike Lohr (Point Ground)

2006-08-30 Thread Lynne Cumming
Apologies for cross posting but I sent this in error to lace-chat first of all. I do need to clarify that it's the book of point ground patterns. Many thanks to Malvery for her help with my original inexact query! Has anyone done any of the butterflies from this book and would they send me a

Re: [lace] website

2006-08-30 Thread Brenda Paternoster
It just comes up with a lot of broken links for me. I guess it's probably because the webpage requires IE6, though there's no error message to say so. The latest version for Mac is IE5 so I can't upgrade and at work we don't have IE6 either. OK it's my choice to use mac and not windows,

[lace] Tebbs different patterns

2006-08-30 Thread Rosemary Naish
Brenda wrote I have the Paul Minet 1978 reprint of Tebbs' Art of Bobbin Lace Reprint including Supplement which is effectively two books in one. The first half of the book is The Art of Bobbin Lace by Louisa A Tebbs and the second half of the book is Supplement to the Art of Bobbin Lace by

Re: [lace] Butterflies and Moths by Ulrike Lohr (Point Ground)

2006-08-30 Thread bevw
Lynne (and everyone), You can see one in progress, until I messed up, at my blog (addy below). I am working it again in silk threads, with more success this time, although I've had to stop work on it while Other Stuff intervenes (a shame how that goes). I will post a picture of it when finished,

Re: [lace] website

2006-08-30 Thread sof
Hello Diane, Do you know Marie Rose LORTET ? http://www.et-alors.org/dossierartistesea/lortetmarierose.html http://www.exporevue.com/magazine/fr/lortetx3.html http://www.rawvision.com/back/lortet/lortet.html http://perso.wanadoo.fr/lelia.mordoch.galerie/expotrans0.html

RE: [lace] Re: Twisted Threads (was Wonderful thread)

2006-08-30 Thread Noelene Lafferty
Jenny, I still have a batch of some thread called LBH Tatting Cotton that came briefly on the market some years ago which also twisted like this. Totally useless for tatting, but bearable for bobbin lace. It would be much thicker than Brok 100/3. When I spoke about this on Arachne, someone said

[lace] Seeing pictures of lace on the Web.

2006-08-30 Thread Joy Beeson
DH found a nifty free program at http://magnifier.sourceforge.net/ It's called Virtual Magnifying Glass, and turns your cursor into a frame that enlarges whatever you put it over. It doesn't add any information, of course, so setting it for more than 2x makes a picture uselessly pixellated.

[lace] Re: Twisted Threads (was Wonderful thread)

2006-08-30 Thread Tamara P Duvall
On Aug 30, 2006, at 6:40, Jenny De Angelis wrote: I have just sorted through my box of cotton threads and found part of a spool of the Brok thread on a spool that I mentioned was hopelessly twisted, I hadn't thrown it all away as I thought. It is Brok 100/3. Yup :) It was the required

[lace-chat] Ulrike Lohr's Butterflies

2006-08-30 Thread Lynne Cumming
Has anyone done any of the butterflies from this book and would they send me a picture if they have? I'm comtemplating getting the book but cannot find anywhere with pics of the actual butterflies and I'd like to see what they are like before buying. There's a very small pic all the butterflies on

[lace-chat] names

2006-08-30 Thread Janice Blair
My daughter needed a long copy of her birth certificate from England and when she compared the two she realised that the short copy did not include her parents names! I never noticed that fact before. My son is a Robin which was more of a male name in England when he was born in 1971 but

Re: [lace-chat] First, Given or Christian Names

2006-08-30 Thread Brenda Paternoster
Hello Jane I haven't checked to see if it is still the case, but on my birth certificate there is a space where a forename may be added to the registered name on production of a baptismal certificate or certificate of naming within 12 months of the registration. I can't say I've ever seen a

Re: [lace-chat] names

2006-08-30 Thread Carol Adkinson
Hi All, The short copy of the birth certificate is usually the one used by the parents of adopted children - our daughter is adopted, and although on original certificates is the name of the parent(s), on the shorter one they are not mentioned - her name is 'Claire Louise Adkinson' on the short

[lace-chat] names

2006-08-30 Thread Jane Partridge
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] omputer, Carol Adkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes The short copy of the birth certificate is usually the one used by the parents of adopted children - From what I remember of DH registering our two daughters, the short certificate was free (ie at initial registration)

Re: [lace-chat] names

2006-08-30 Thread Martha Krieg
In one family I know, the children all got the same initials so they could inherit the monogrammed items and they'd be still applicable! Though I never saw that they had all that much - maybe it just came out for family feasts, and I'm not family! --

Re: [lace-chat] surnames titles

2006-08-30 Thread Joy Beeson
A far-future approach to the topic, from an unpublished SF story. (context: Chris is trying to distract his mother's guest's attention away from a topic that is embarrassing to discuss with a woman from another planet.) Cris rubbed his cheek thoughtfully, and said Ivan isn't allowed to

Re: [lace-chat] a question about surname

2006-08-30 Thread Joy Beeson
I was rather surprised that the southern custom was to add another initial; my Louisiana relatives never mentioned it. But of course the old folks were married before they moved down there, and I'd lost touch by the time the kids married. On the other hand, I've always known that I was entitled

[lace-chat] Re: names

2006-08-30 Thread Tamara P Duvall
On Aug 30, 2006, at 13:28, Janice Blair wrote: When I write to married female friends I never use a title and much prefer just the plain name and I don't care if it upsets anyone, Send them on; won't upset me at all :) [...] but my Christmas cards always are addressed to Mr. Mrs followed