*Assumpte: *Re: [Lam-public] Any suggestions for combining posix
groups withemail groups?
Actually, it turns out that you can't combine posixGroup with
groupOfUniqueNames - they are both structural classes so you can
only have one of them.
So I'm still
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Philip,
On 10.01.2013 12:31, Philip Colmer wrote:
I was really hoping that I didn't have to end up having duplicate
groups - a security version and an email version. I guess I
could have a script that goes through the groups keeping them in
hi,
- Original Message -
From: Roland Gruber p...@rolandgruber.de
Sent: Thursday, 10 January 2013, 18:16
Subject: Re: [Lam-public] Any suggestions for combining posix groups with
email groups?
Unfortunately, there is no perfect solution. :(
for the sogo groupware¹, (ab-)using
A Dijous 10 Gener 2013, Philip Colmer va escriure:
Thanks for the input, Mourik.
The reason why I picked groupOfUniqueNames rather than groupOfNames was
because that is the preferred objectClass for Atlassian Crowd, which we are
intending to use for SSO, sitting on top of the LDAP store. I
Hi
Apologies if this isn't directly relevant to LAM but I'm hoping that the
list audience will have come across a similar challenge and may have some
ideas or knowledge to share.
I'm trying to use an LDAP store for both user authentication and
synchronisation to Google Apps. To that end, I want
you can modify your schemas to make both work together. I do it all the
time.
--
*De: *Philip Colmer philip.col...@linaro.org
*A: *lam-public@lists.sourceforge.net
*Enviat: *Dimecres, 9 de Gener 9el 2013 11:55:43
*Assumpte: *Re: [Lam-public] Any suggestions
