Re: [Langcom] Proposal for eligible status for Wikipedia in Cora

Hoi, I am quite happy when someone argue their case. I will certainly listen. In the past there were Americans who said to support languages from Papua New Guinea. Their arguments is why we ask for native speakers. The good thing of this policy is that we can do differently when the situation fits

Re: [Langcom] Proposal for eligible status for Wikipedia in Cora

but as mentioned before, a language under revitalization effort mught have hundred of thousands L2 speakers with hundreds of them willing to work on the Wikipedia but it is still possible for none of them to be native. 2017年1月30日 17:13 於 "Milos Rancic" 寫道： > On Jan 30, 2017

[Langcom] Proposal for eligibility of [Wikipedia in] Dogri

Hi all, The first Indic language request I saw today was a request for Wikipedia Dorgi.[1] Dogri is one of the 22 scheduled languages of India.[2] The Wikipedia article mentions that Dogri is written in both Devanagari and Perso-Arabic scripts. I personally have known Dogri to be written in

Re: [Langcom] Proposal for the new member

On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 10:30 PM, MF-Warburg wrote: > Done now. The chart used some formatting trick I didn't understand as well, > now I switched it to the (codewise) lengthier version also used in e.g. the > stewards chart. > And is the former members' line orange for

Re: [Langcom] Lingua Franca Nova

On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 7:44 AM, Gerard Meijssen wrote: > We had in the past really well functioning languages that were also shifted > to Wikia. It is all part and parcel of the original idea of the policy to > prevent the easy creation of new projects. This was needed