Re: [Langcom] 2018 SIL approvals (was: Western Armenian has been adopted "hyw")

2018-01-31 Thread Michael Everson
Gerard. 639-2 is a subset of 639-3 > On 31 Jan 2018, at 09:57, Gerard Meijssen wrote: > > Hoi, > Wait a sec; Montenegrin is to be recognised by the ISO 639-3. I do not care > for what ISO 639-2 has to say. > Thanks, > GerardM > > On 31 January 2018 at 10:47,

Re: [Langcom] Western Armenian has been adopted "hyw"

2018-01-31 Thread Amir E. Aharoni
So... This raises several questions. 1. Should this language be added to translatewiki.net? This was requested some time ago: https://translatewiki.net/wiki/Thread:Support/Add_ support_for_Western_Armenian_(hym) . This means that it will be possible to translate MediaWiki into it. 2. I couldn't

Re: [Langcom] Western Armenian has been adopted "hyw"

2018-01-31 Thread Michael Everson
On 31 Jan 2018, at 12:39, Oliver Stegen wrote: > > Congratulations, Michael and the entire Western Armenian community (or rather > communities!). And thanks for all the effort you put into this! It was quite a lot of effort, producing the proposal document. Now let’s

Re: [Langcom] Western Armenian has been adopted "hyw"

2018-01-31 Thread Oliver Stegen
Congratulations, Michael and the entire Western Armenian community (or rather communities!). And thanks for all the effort you put into this! Cheers, Oliver On 30-Jan-18 23:22, Michael Everson wrote: http://www-01.sil.org/iso639-3/cr_files/639-3_ChangeRequests_2017_Summary.pdf

Re: [Langcom] Western Armenian has been adopted "hyw"

2018-01-31 Thread MF-Warburg
2018-01-31 16:04 GMT+01:00 Michael Everson : > > Now let’s get this one going. What do they have to do now? > > Translate the most-used messages of the interface and be active at https://incubator.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wp/hyw ___

Re: [Langcom] Western Armenian has been adopted "hyw"

2018-01-31 Thread Michael Everson
I am cc’ing two of our Armenian Wikimedia colleagues here. Michael > On 31 Jan 2018, at 15:56, Steven White wrote: > > So here's what has to happen next: > > • Someone at translatewiki.net should activate the code. (Calling Amir > ...) > • The community

Re: [Langcom] Western Armenian has been adopted "hyw"

2018-01-31 Thread Michael Everson
On 31 Jan 2018, at 12:56, Amir E. Aharoni wrote: > So... This raises several questions. Really? > 1. Should this language be added to translatewiki.net? This was requested > some time ago: >

Re: [Langcom] Final group of projects with requests lingering since 2010

2018-01-31 Thread Phake Nick
One thing to consider: - In the previous code application, Hainanese was mentioned as a thing to consider about before splitting out Teochew. There are currently request for a code for Hainanese which will probably take some times to handle, and I would not expect request for Teochew to surface

Re: [Langcom] Final group of projects with requests lingering since 2010

2018-01-31 Thread Steven White
As long as there is some activity continuing around Southern Min, I'll leave it open. Understand that if it is closed as stale, that closure would be without prejudice against a future request when things are squared away. So don't worry too much about it. Steven Sent from

Re: [Langcom] Western Armenian has been adopted "hyw"

2018-01-31 Thread MF-Warburg
2018-01-31 16:56 GMT+01:00 Steven White : > Do we need to set up Armenian Wikipedia as a transwiki import SOURCE to > Incubator so that articles can be brought over more easily? (MF-W?) > > It's not necessary because XML import is also possible and its correct handling

Re: [Langcom] Western Armenian has been adopted "hyw"

2018-01-31 Thread Asaf Bartov
They do. At least hundreds of articles. A. On Jan 31, 2018 18:35, "MF-Warburg" wrote: > 2018-01-31 16:56 GMT+01:00 Steven White : > >> Do we need to set up Armenian Wikipedia as a transwiki import SOURCE to >> Incubator so that articles can

Re: [Langcom] Western Armenian has been adopted "hyw"

2018-01-31 Thread Amir E. Aharoni
‬ 2018-01-31 17:18 GMT+02:00 Michael Everson : > On 31 Jan 2018, at 12:56, Amir E. Aharoni > wrote: > > > If we reject Montenegrin, but support Western Armenian, we'll have to > explain it. > > Absolutely we do not have to do this. Let me

Re: [Langcom] Western Armenian has been adopted "hyw"

2018-01-31 Thread Amir E. Aharoni
2018-01-31 17:56 GMT+02:00 Steven White : > So here's what has to happen next: > > > >- Someone at translatewiki.net should activate the code. (Calling Amir >...) >- > > Here you go: https://github.com/wikimedia/language-data/pull/5

[Langcom] Request for Closure of Cebuano Wikipedia

2018-01-31 Thread Steven White
See https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposals_for_closing_projects/Closure_of_Cebuano_Wikipedia. This has been sitting open since October. In general, I think this should be rejected. First, it was created by someone who was mostly just creating requests (for both project creations and

Re: [Langcom] 2018 SIL approvals (was: Western Armenian has been adopted "hyw")

2018-01-31 Thread Gerard Meijssen
Hoi, Thank you Steven :) Gerard On 31 January 2018 at 11:27, Steven White wrote: > No, Gerard. What I meant was that Montenegrin wasn't listed in the 2017 > SIL approval process because it came to SIL through the ISO 639-2 process, > not through a standard ISO 639-3

[Langcom] 2018 SIL approvals (was: Western Armenian has been adopted "hyw")

2018-01-31 Thread Steven White
In fact, the entire 2017 SIL approval/rejection results are available here. (Montenegrin does not appear here, as that was a separate process through ISO 639-2.) Sent from Outlook

Re: [Langcom] 2018 SIL approvals (was: Western Armenian has been adopted "hyw")

2018-01-31 Thread Gerard Meijssen
Hoi, Wait a sec; Montenegrin is to be recognised by the ISO 639-3. I do not care for what ISO 639-2 has to say. Thanks, GerardM On 31 January 2018 at 10:47, Steven White wrote: > In fact, the entire 2017 SIL approval/rejection results are available here >

Re: [Langcom] 2018 SIL approvals (was: Western Armenian has been adopted "hyw")

2018-01-31 Thread Steven White
No, Gerard. What I meant was that Montenegrin wasn't listed in the 2017 SIL approval process because it came to SIL through the ISO 639-2 process, not through a standard ISO 639-3 change request. But SIL most definitely has approved the code as an ISO 639-3. See