On 2015-10-14 06:37, Dominique Pellé wrote:
> I can see that sometimes, it's OK to treat nbsp as a whitespace,
> but here, it's not since the goal of the rule is precisely to check
> for
> nbsp (either U+00A0 or U+202F). I'm not sure how to fix it. Maybe
> we need an API to return the kind of whit
Daniel Naber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we have quite some changes in the nightly tests today. I'm not sure what
> the cause is, could you check your language and see if the changes are
> good or bad?
>
> https://languagetool.org/regression-tests/20151013/
>
> Regards
> Daniel
Hi Daniel
For French, all
Hi,
we have quite some changes in the nightly tests today. I'm not sure what
the cause is, could you check your language and see if the changes are
good or bad?
https://languagetool.org/regression-tests/20151013/
Regards
Daniel
--
