Re: [LARTC] Multipath Routing Problems

2006-06-26 Thread Armin ranjbar
On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 21:46:06 +0300 Vladimir Vitkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Remove multipath caching and try again if i remove CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_CACHED i will be unable to use : CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_RR CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_RANDOM CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_WRANDOM

Re: [LARTC] fwmark filter doesn't work as expected

2006-06-26 Thread Andy Furniss
MichaƂ Margula wrote: Hello! Currently I am marking packets with IPMARK, and then using following rules: 1: class add dev eth0 parent 1:4 classid 1:100a htb rate $rate ceil $ceil quantum 1600 2: qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:100a handle 100a:0 sfq perturb 10 3:

Re: [LARTC] Egress shaping recommendations (based on source ip)

2006-06-26 Thread Andy Furniss
Ray Van Dolson wrote: I'm trying to set up customer egress shaping on concentrator that customers connect to using pptp (which uses pppd). This means customers each have a pppXXX interface when they connect. It's easy to shape their down speed this way, and when they disconnect the interface

Re: [LARTC] please advise me in HTB and HFSC

2006-06-26 Thread Andy Furniss
*~ r a K u ~ * wrote: now i'm read a lot of knowledge paper about traffic control in linux because now i'm try to develop and research about traffic shaper so can everybody tell me about my topic ... Is it can do for real my topic is now, many organization use traffic shaper for control

Re: [LARTC] Dynamic Linux Traffic Control

2006-06-26 Thread Andy Furniss
Paul wrote: Hey all, heres my problem/s. I have to write code which upon a message from another component 1. Reserves bandwidth for a voip call between 2 hosts.My code will reside on neither of the hosts but the hosts will have to go through me to talk to eachother. 2. Since i'm reserving

VoIP using just prio qdisc? No. was [ [LARTC] Sanity Check ]

2006-06-26 Thread Martin A. Brown
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Good morning, Mike, : I need a sanity check. I'm trying to setup my network to handle : VoIP. I'm thinking that all I need to do is prioritize the : realtime traffic above the interactive and bulk traffic. I see : so much discussion about

[LARTC] Can i attach another qdisc under classes or root qdisc?

2006-06-26 Thread *~ r a K u ~ *
now, i'm learning and try to read a lot of article about tc command in linux for setting traffic shaper.but i'm doubt aboutIn the theory about tc command ... In general, we define class under root qdiscbut Is it can be possible If we define another qdisc under root qdisc, Can i do it?because

Re: [LARTC] Multipath Routing Problems

2006-06-26 Thread Luciano Ruete
On Monday 26 June 2006 08:28, Armin ranjbar wrote: On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 21:46:06 +0300 Vladimir Vitkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Remove multipath caching and try again if i remove CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_CACHED i will be unable to use : CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_RR

Re: [LARTC] Optimization on Bandwidth Management-L7 filtering?

2006-06-26 Thread Andraz Sraka
re On Sun, 2006-06-11 at 04:32 +, lee weejin wrote: Since all the incoming packets was checked one by one-(it is time consuming and will cause the processing delay if it is handling more than 50 PC at a time), thus i am thinking that is there any way to have a random checking on incoming

Re: VoIP using just prio qdisc? No. was [ [LARTC] Sanity Check ]

2006-06-26 Thread Mike Diehl
Martin, I'm not trying to be obstinate, I'm just trying to understand this more fully. But I sure appreciate the time you spent answering my question. But, I'm still missing something. You mention below that during a VoIP session, another user could start up a large, high bandwidth, transfer