Re: [Lazarus] Changes to fpWeb...

On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 3:21 AM, Michael Van Canneyt via Lazarus wrote: > > > On Tue, 1 May 2018, Marcos Douglas B. Santos via Lazarus wrote: > >>> but I would appreciate >>> feedback if you have cases where your datamodules no longer behave as >>> they >>> used to

Re: [Lazarus] Changes to fpWeb...

On Tue, 1 May 2018, Marcos Douglas B. Santos via Lazarus wrote: but I would appreciate feedback if you have cases where your datamodules no longer behave as they used to (both with LegacyRouting=true or false) Some more improvements to fpweb are planned, but they will not be as invasive as

Re: [Lazarus] Changes to fpWeb...

On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 9:59 PM, Marcos Douglas B. Santos wrote: > Hello Michael, > > Is there a documentation link to explain all new features? > I'm gonna start a new web project and I would like to use them. > > What about the design packages for Lazarus? > The wizards

Re: [Lazarus] Changes to fpWeb...

On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 7:36 PM, Michael Van Canneyt via Lazarus < lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org> wrote: > > Hello, > > I have committed a serious change to the way fpweb handles requests. > > Especially routing of requests was changed. > > The old Delphi style routing worked with Datamodules

Re: [Lazarus] Changes to fpWeb...

El 17/01/17 a las 06:48, Michael Schnell via Lazarus escribió: On 17.01.2017 10:27, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: There is. Look for bauglirwebsocket. It implements the websocket protocol. That is good to know ! Thanks, -Michael Nice!, thanks. -- Leonardo M. Ramé Medical IT - Griensu S.A.

Re: [Lazarus] Changes to fpWeb...

El 17/01/17 a las 06:29, Michael Schnell via Lazarus escribió: On 16.01.2017 21:59, Leonardo M. Ramé via Lazarus wrote: The only framework I'm aware of implementing it is m0rm0t. What do you mean by "The only" ? The only at all (I suppose that there are several of those) or the only that

Re: [Lazarus] Changes to fpWeb...

On 17.01.2017 10:27, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: There is. Look for bauglirwebsocket. It implements the websocket protocol. That is good to know ! Thanks, -Michael -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org

Re: [Lazarus] Changes to fpWeb...

On 16.01.2017 22:21, Lars via Lazarus wrote: What is the exact name of it... couldn't find it: http://blog.synopse.info/category/Open-Source-Projects/mORMot-Framework -Michael -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org

Re: [Lazarus] Changes to fpWeb...

On 16.01.2017 21:59, Leonardo M. Ramé via Lazarus wrote: The only framework I'm aware of implementing it is m0rm0t. What do you mean by "The only" ? The only at all (I suppose that there are several of those) or the only that explicitly supports pascal / fpc / Lazarus. (I don't know any at

Re: [Lazarus] Changes to fpWeb...

On Tue, 17 Jan 2017, Michael Schnell via Lazarus wrote: On 16.01.2017 20:19, Daniel Gaspary wrote: Can you give examples of these messages? And who (nginx, apache..?) and how they are implemented? In fact I can't, either, that is why I ask. I do know that there are several frameworks

Re: [Lazarus] Changes to fpWeb...

On 16.01.2017 20:19, Daniel Gaspary wrote: Can you give examples of these messages? And who (nginx, apache..?) and how they are implemented? In fact I can't, either, that is why I ask. I do know that there are several frameworks that support this by running rather complex Java script on

Re: [Lazarus] Changes to fpWeb...

On Mon, January 16, 2017 1:59 pm, Leonardo M. Ramé via Lazarus wrote: >> Indeed, does he mean javascript pop up messages, but initiated by the >> server? when is the message displayed and why would it be displayed? an >> ajax on the current web page loaded, but initiated by the server? > > I

Re: [Lazarus] Changes to fpWeb...

On Mon, January 16, 2017 12:19 pm, Daniel Gaspary via Lazarus wrote: > On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 8:12 AM, Michael Schnell via Lazarus > wrote: > >> Does fpweb / weblaz already support status messages from the server to >> the client (or will it some day) to allow for

Re: [Lazarus] Changes to fpWeb...

On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 8:12 AM, Michael Schnell via Lazarus wrote: > Does fpweb / weblaz already support status messages from the server to the > client (or will it some day) to allow for "Rich Web Applications") ? I don't work very often with web, but I'm

Re: [Lazarus] Changes to fpWeb...

On 14.01.2017 15:34, Marcos Douglas B. Santos via Lazarus wrote: I'm feeling we've started to go ahead writing complex Web systems Does fpweb / weblaz already support status messages from the server to the client (or will it some day) to allow for "Rich Web Applications") ? Thanks Michael and

Re: [Lazarus] Changes to fpWeb...

On Sat, 14 Jan 2017, Marcos Douglas B. Santos via Lazarus wrote: On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 8:36 PM, Michael Van Canneyt via Lazarus wrote: Hello, I have committed a serious change to the way fpweb handles requests. Especially routing of requests was changed.

Re: [Lazarus] Changes to fpWeb...

On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 8:36 PM, Michael Van Canneyt via Lazarus wrote: > > Hello, > > I have committed a serious change to the way fpweb handles requests. > > Especially routing of requests was changed. > > [...] For me, this is great news. I'm feeling we've

[Lazarus] Changes to fpWeb...

Hello, I have committed a serious change to the way fpweb handles requests. Especially routing of requests was changed. The old Delphi style routing worked with Datamodules only. The pattern was strictly /modulename/actionname or through query variables: ?module=xyz=nmo This old routing is