El 24/10/2016 a las 2:19, Lars via Lazarus escribió:
Those are some interesting reads. It confirms my gut instinct to choose
chromium embedded (CEF) for development, instead of mozilla embedded, as
chromium embedded seems more designed for embedding at this stage than the
more immature firefox
On Sat, October 22, 2016 7:25 am, José Mejuto via Lazarus wrote:
>
> The link that explains almost anything:
>
>
> https://dutherenverseauborddelatable.wordpress.com/2016/03/07/the-gecko-m
> onoculture/
>
> And the link that shows the embedding problem:
>
>
>
On Sat, October 22, 2016 4:59 am, José Mejuto via Lazarus wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> Yes XulRunner is being replaced by GeckoSDK, but the main difference is
> that XulRunner had an stable API (frozen) and some semi-stable APIs, so
> most base functions for embed are stable. This is now longer
El 22/10/2016 a las 5:10, Lars via Lazarus escribió:
Isn't there a new xulrunner architecutre they created to replace it..
that's what I remember reading. I will find a link to the page and report
back here soon if I find it.
https://github.com/zotero/translation-server/issues/24
Someone says
On Fri, October 21, 2016 6:04 am, José Mejuto via Lazarus wrote:
>
> Embeded Firefox is not possible anymore via XulRunner as embedded
> support has been dropped by Mozilla.
Really? I heard about them changing the architecture to a new embedded
architecture and no longer supporting an old
El 21/10/2016 a las 13:23, Lars via Lazarus escribió:
When you dabbed with firefox embedded, was it a lazarus component? Or did
you make calls directly to an API without using a component?
Hello,
Embeded Firefox is not possible anymore via XulRunner as embedded
support has been dropped by
What is the actual status of chromium embedded and firefox embedded on
bsd? Does it only work on Windows and Linux?
Seems there is not so much info about CEF in general on freebsd other than
this info:
https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-chromium/2014-January/001113.html
I so much love
