I also experience this using KDE and GTK build. It seems that the
auto-complete opens a new window that does not accept the focus, but keeps
it on the editor window.
When I use a single window button on the task bar, I do not remember it
happening at all (I hope I'll have some time over the
2010/7/13 ik ido...@gmail.com:
I also experience this using KDE and GTK build. It seems that the
auto-complete opens a new window that does not accept the focus, but keeps
it on the editor window.
http://docs.kde.org/development/en/kdebase-workspace/kcontrol/windowbehaviour/index.html
in the
2010/7/13 Juha Manninen juha.manni...@phnet.fi:
Noli Sicad wrote:
Then why don't you use VitualTreeView in Lazarus? It is supported in
Lazarus. I just install it the other day.
Actually I would need it for the Lazarus code itself, for converter
configuration.
VirtualTreeView is not very big
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 20:58 -0300, Marcelo B de Paula wrote:
Hi list,
As the subject of this post suggest, i am in trouble with these components.
I read that TMemDataSet was similar to Delphi´s TClientDataSet as memory
dataset. But i also read that people was using TBufDataSet instead of
Now I remember, last time I checked VirtualTreeView for Lazarus it had x86
assembly code which is not portable obviously.
Is that still the case?
VirtualTreeView cannot be used for Lazarus itself if it's not portable.
Juha
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 14:44:53 +0300
Juha Manninen juha.manni...@phnet.fi wrote:
Then there is
FileExists -- FileExistsUTF8($1)
Now only I realized that FileExistsUTF8 and other UTF8 functions are
defined
in codetools FileProcs unit.
I guess a dependency for it should be added to the
Juha Manninen escreveu:
Now I remember, last time I checked VirtualTreeView for Lazarus it had x86
assembly code which is not portable obviously.
Is that still the case?
Yes.
Luiz
VirtualTreeView cannot be used for Lazarus itself if it's not portable.
Juha
--
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 08:35:36 -0300
Luiz Americo Pereira Camara luiz...@oi.com.br wrote:
Juha Manninen escreveu:
Now I remember, last time I checked VirtualTreeView for Lazarus it had x86
assembly code which is not portable obviously.
Is that still the case?
Yes.
Luiz
Probably you already do this: if the project uses the LCL it
should use the unit FileUtil.
Ok, it is either codetools/FileProcs or lcl/FileUtil, depending on which one
is last in Uses section.
I guess it is again some more duplicated code between codetools and LCL.
The problem comes when
VirtualTreeView cannot be used for Lazarus itself if it's not portable.
In the Object Inspector there is inspector tab, so it is up to
developer /programmer what components he use in his program.
The 3 VTV components does not have restrictions in my lazarus
installation - Windows, x86 Mac OS X
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 15:11:13 +0300
Juha Manninen juha.manni...@phnet.fi wrote:
Probably you already do this: if the project uses the LCL it
should use the unit FileUtil.
Ok, it is either codetools/FileProcs or lcl/FileUtil, depending on which one
is last in Uses section.
Uses section?
Noli Sicad wrote:
In the Object Inspector there is inspector tab, so it is up to
developer /programmer what components he use in his program.
The 3 VTV components does not have restrictions in my lazarus
installation - Windows, x86 Mac OS X and x86 Linux OS.
Now the question was about the
Juha Manninen escreveu:
Including VirtualTreeView into Lazarus code-base would make it compile on x86
architecture only and many people would be unhappy.
I wouldn't be happy either if I forced such a limitation. (although I
currently have only x86 machines myself.)
@Luiz: is there any plan to
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Maybe the converter can add comments, what it has done.
It does now. The comment is added at the end of the converted function which
makes the line long sometimes. I can later try adding a new line for the
comment in front of the function call.
I try to make the
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Uses section?
Maybe you mean required package?
Maybe. I have lazarus.lpi open and my mind is mixed up.
BTW, unit FileUtil is one of the base units of the LCL, without
widgetset dependencies. Using it in console applications is safe.
Yes, after adding LCL dependency
Hi
I'd like to set TDBGrid when almost all columns except first are read-
only. So far so good - I have set them to read only and first column
which is boolean type has nice checkboxes. I have two little problems
yet : when scrolling with down arrow DBGrid tries to add empty row in
the end
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010, Juha Manninen wrote:
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Uses section?
Maybe you mean required package?
Maybe. I have lazarus.lpi open and my mind is mixed up.
BTW, unit FileUtil is one of the base units of the LCL, without
widgetset dependencies. Using it in console
13.07.2010 7:30, Juha Manninen wrote:
If I want to use columns in a TreeView, what alternatives I have?
One alternative is to implement column support for TTreeView component.
According to treeview.inc file this feature was in someone todo list.
Best regards,
Paul Ishenin.
--
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 16:06:39 +0200 (CEST)
Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010, Juha Manninen wrote:
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Uses section?
Maybe you mean required package?
Maybe. I have lazarus.lpi open and my mind is mixed up.
BTW, unit
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 16:06:39 +0200 (CEST)
Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010, Juha Manninen wrote:
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Uses section?
Maybe you mean required package?
Maybe. I have lazarus.lpi open and
Thanks Joost for the answer.
I forgot to mention that i am using Lazarus trunk (0.9.29 rev 26602) with
fpc 2.5.1.
I just mentioned TClientDataset because of others said here in the list and
in Lazarus forum.
My concern is that the component seems to be incomplete e can cause some
user
Juha Manninen schrieb:
Noli Sicad wrote:
Then why don't you use VitualTreeView in Lazarus? It is supported in
Lazarus. I just install it the other day.
Actually I would need it for the Lazarus code itself, for converter
configuration.
VirtualTreeView is not very big but it adds some more
Le Saturday 10 July 2010 22:39:00 Mattias Gaertner, vous avez écrit :
On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 22:00:57 +0200
Jean-Marc jmarc.levec...@dbmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Using Lazarus 0.9.28 on my old Mdv 2008-1 KDE3.5, I am willing to move
to the new Mdv 2010-1 KDE4.
Surprisingly, it carries
2010/7/13 Bogusław Brandys bran...@o2.pl
Hi
I'd like to set TDBGrid when almost all columns except first are read-
only. So far so good - I have set them to read only and first column which
is boolean type has nice checkboxes. I have two little problems yet : when
scrolling with down arrow
Frank Church pisze:
2010/7/13 Bogusław Brandys bran...@o2.pl mailto:bran...@o2.pl
Hi
I'd like to set TDBGrid when almost all columns except first are
read- only. So far so good - I have set them to read only and first
column which is boolean type has nice checkboxes. I have
Zaher Dirkey schrieb:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Marcos Douglas m...@delfire.net
mailto:m...@delfire.net wrote:
Sorry guys, for my crazy idea =)
But I have another doubt: The Lazarus should be started by
startlazarus.exe, right? If I use arguments in lazarus.exe, how
Hi Zaher,
2010/7/13 Zaher Dirkey parm...@gmail.com:
There is old topic, it is easy to change the source of Lazarus ide
http://www.mail-archive.com/lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/msg07179.html
I did not understand. I not want to change the source... I want to
change only settings files
27 matches
Mail list logo
