On 05/16/2011 05:27 PM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
Will this allow to create a project with a browser based remote GUI ?
Yes.
Great. looking forward to test it.
Will this help to create a Lazarus Application running as a Daemon on
an Android device and have the user access it via
On Tue, 17 May 2011 01:38:00 +0200
Reimar Grabowski reimg...@web.de wrote:
On Mon, 16 May 2011 11:03:28 +0200
Mattias Gaertner nc-gaert...@netcologne.de wrote:
Hi all,
For those wondering what the new button in the parameter hints is good
for:
On 05/13/2011 05:44 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
I've been maintaining a public git mirror of FPC and Lazarus for over a
year.
More details here:
http://wiki.freepascal.org/git_mirrors
Great.
Thanks,
-Michael
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Additional Question:
A trivial project runs without a glitch.
Now I used compiled my Linux inter-Thread-Communication testing
project on Windows.
This does work perfectly, but, even if I have it do nothing (no
thread created etc), when closing the
On Tue, 17 May 2011, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 05/16/2011 05:27 PM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
Will this allow to create a project with a browser based remote GUI ?
Yes.
Great. looking forward to test it.
Will this help to create a Lazarus Application running as a Daemon on an
Hi all,
Is it possible to use Necessitas (Qt for Android) with Lazarus? I mean
if anyone tried or if it could work :)
it's simply curiosity (for now: I don't have android devices)
Regards,
Kjow
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
On 17/05/2011 10:34, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
buggy, it didn't react unless you moved the mouse in the app, both in
Windows and Linux if I recall corretly.
I remember it being Windows only - but that's not important.
While TTimer has been fixed almost immediatly by Graeme after I
On 15/05/2011 23:05, Lee Jenkins wrote:
Great stuff Michael. I can see many uses for the HTTPClient alone without
having to use a third libraries.
Definitely! As soon as FPC 2.6.0 is out, I'll use it in tiOPF's
multi-tier support as well.
Nice work Michael.
Regards,
- Graeme -
--
fpGUI
On 05/17/2011 10:34 AM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
Any implementation will always use polling. You may hide it under some
kind
of abstraction, but it's always polling. On unix with select() or
epoll(), on Windows with PeekMessage/GetMessage and friends. Your
Delphi windows timer uses
On 05/17/2011 10:42 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Correct. While that design may not be ideal (please mention new designs
if they exist), it is perfectly acceptable in fpGUI because after all,
fpGUI is a 'gui toolkit' for 'gui applications'. ;-)
I really would like to test the newest version :-)
On Tue, 17 May 2011, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 05/17/2011 10:34 AM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
Any implementation will always use polling. You may hide it under some kind
of abstraction, but it's always polling. On unix with select() or epoll(),
on Windows with
On 05/17/2011 11:09 AM, Michael Schnell wrote:
I really would like to test the newest version :-) .
I just fetched the newest update and not I can't compile it any more,.
I get
../../../../fpGUI/src/corelib/x11/fpg_interface.pas(26,3) Fatal: Can't
find unit fpg_x11 used by fpg_interface
Hello Lazarus-List,
Tuesday, May 17, 2011, 10:24:37 AM, you wrote:
MS This does work perfectly, but, even if I have it do nothing (no thread
MS created etc), when closing the program I get:
MS In Linux with GTK2, there is no problem when stopping the program
MS How to find out what is wrong here
On 17/05/2011 11:30, Michael Schnell wrote:
I just fetched the newest update and not I can't compile it any more,.
I haven't tried to compile or use LCL-fpGUI widgetset in ages... I'll
see if I can take a look in the next few days.
Regards,
- Graeme -
--
fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform
On 05/17/2011 11:32 AM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
That's just name picking. Polling = asking a question.
OK, to be clear we should use busy polling (according to a busy
loop or spinlock).
But even not busy polling (that avoids performance killing for other
threads and processes) is
Your code is compiled with heap trace in the linking section, and good
news your code do not have memory leaks :)
So I was fooled by the should be..., making me think something is wrong.
Thanks,
-Michael
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
On Tue, 17 May 2011, Inoussa OUEDRAOGO wrote:
I've committed simple HTTP server (threaded or not) and HTTP Client
components to FCL-Web. They work using the fcl-net ssockets unit. (for which
a fix has been committed as well). Both use blocking sockets.
Great news ! It should be now
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Marcos Douglas m...@delfire.net wrote:
I used the fpc.cfg text posted in tutorial (I copied it from an
installation default).
Just create a text file and copy/paste the text of tutorial.
Hi,
Today I changed the tuturial[1] because the version of compiler in
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 5:46 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys
graemeg.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15/05/2011 23:05, Lee Jenkins wrote:
Great stuff Michael. I can see many uses for the HTTPClient alone without
having to use a third libraries.
Definitely! As soon as FPC 2.6.0 is out, I'll use it in tiOPF's
On 17/05/2011 14:53, Marcos Douglas wrote:
Yes, nice work... but what is the problem about third libraries?
Nothing per se. But having some vital functionality included in FPC just
makes it so much easier to get a new developer system up and running
(less to install and configure). Not to
On Tue, 17 May 2011 09:48:25 +0200
Mattias Gaertner nc-gaert...@netcologne.de wrote:
Nice feature but how do you use it keyboard only?
You can not.
Thought so. :(
R.
--
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A:
On Tue, 17 May 2011, Inoussa OUEDRAOGO wrote:
2011/5/17 Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org
On Tue, 17 May 2011, Inoussa OUEDRAOGO wrote:
I've committed simple HTTP server (threaded or not) and HTTP Client
components to FCL-Web. They work using the fcl-net ssockets unit. (for
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys
graemeg.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17/05/2011 14:53, Marcos Douglas wrote:
Yes, nice work... but what is the problem about third libraries?
Nothing per se. But having some vital functionality included in FPC just
makes it so much easier to
On 17/05/2011 15:45, Marcos Douglas wrote:
But it's also reinventing the wheel, no?
That could be considered another down side, especially if the 3rd party
library has a lot of functionality.
Other benefits:
- A lite version could be implemented in FPC - reducing time to
implement, and
On 5/17/2011 9:00 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 17/05/2011 14:53, Marcos Douglas wrote:
Yes, nice work... but what is the problem about third libraries?
Nothing per se. But having some vital functionality included in FPC just
makes it so much easier to get a new developer system up and
On Tue, 17 May 2011, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys
graemeg.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17/05/2011 14:53, Marcos Douglas wrote:
Yes, nice work... but what is the problem about third libraries?
Nothing per se. But having some vital functionality
On Tue, 17 May 2011, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 17/05/2011 15:45, Marcos Douglas wrote:
But it's also reinventing the wheel, no?
That could be considered another down side, especially if the 3rd party
library has a lot of functionality.
Other benefits:
- A lite version could be
On Tue, 17 May 2011, Lee Jenkins wrote:
On 5/17/2011 9:00 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 17/05/2011 14:53, Marcos Douglas wrote:
Yes, nice work... but what is the problem about third libraries?
Nothing per se. But having some vital functionality included in FPC just
makes it so much
One thing I'd like to raise is SSL/TSL. For apps development via FPC
as an industrial viable option, FPC needs SSL/TLS support. Even if
you use openSSL- it still needs to be included.
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 11:13 AM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Tue, 17 May 2011, Marcos Douglas wrote:
Sorry Michael,
I like yours projects so much. I just want understand the real
vantages in this project to migrate, eg, the Synapse can do same, no?
It can.
But then we must
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Lee Jenkins l...@datatrakpos.com wrote:
On 5/17/2011 9:00 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 17/05/2011 14:53, Marcos Douglas wrote:
Yes, nice work... but what is the problem about third libraries?
Nothing per se. But having some vital functionality included
On 5/17/2011 10:08 AM, Andrew Brunner wrote:
One thing I'd like to raise is SSL/TSL. For apps development via FPC
as an industrial viable option, FPC needs SSL/TLS support. Even if
you use openSSL- it still needs to be included.
I would also very much like to see that as well. It's become
On 5/17/2011 05:59, Michael Schnell wrote:
Your code is compiled with heap trace in the linking section, and good
news your code do not have memory leaks :)
So I was fooled by the should be..., making me think something is wrong.
looking again at the graphic, i would say there is something
On 5/17/2011 08:41, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Marcos Douglasm...@delfire.net wrote:
I used the fpc.cfg text posted in tutorial (I copied it from an
installation default).
Just create a text file and copy/paste the text of tutorial.
Hi,
Today I changed the
I don't think anyone has seriously tryed.
An interesting interview about necessitas: http://www.behindkde.org/node/925
It seams quite interesting, seams that he used the Surface API and
custom-draws widgets. I bet it will have serious issues with all the
wierd virtual keyboards and fonts one can
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 11:37 AM, waldo kitty wkitt...@windstream.net wrote:
On 5/17/2011 08:41, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Marcos Douglasm...@delfire.net wrote:
I used the fpc.cfg text posted in tutorial (I copied it from an
installation default).
Just create
36 matches
Mail list logo
