2011/1/3 Kjow :
> 2011/1/3 Vincent Snijders :
>> Please, create a bug report, I will assign it to Felipe.
>>
>> It breaks deb building too.
>
> I noticed that this problem is present only when I do a "Clean Up + Build
> all".
> With "Build all&
2011/1/3 Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho :
>
> I fixed TNotebook, so obviously any code which depended on the old
> wrong behavior is broken.
Can you document this on a new page like
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Lazarus_0.9.30_release_notes for
the 0.99 release?
Vincent
--
2011/1/2 Kjow :
> I just updated to latest lazarus/fpc svn and this is the compiling error:
>
> ...
> ...
> ...
> Compiling messagedialogs.pp
> Compiling resource units\i386-win32\messagedialogs.or
> Linking .\messagedialogs.exe
> 85 lines compiled, 0.7 sec , 1200960 bytes code, 287208 bytes data
>
Hi,
In preparation for the upcoming Lazarus 0.9.30 release, I have
upgraded the Lazarus version in our testing Ubuntu repository to
snapshot from the fixes_0_9_30 branch. It has the version number
0.9.29.
See
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Lazarus_release_version_for_Ubuntu#Long_version:_ste
2011/1/2 ik :
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to build Lazarus 0.9.31 r23597:28822M FPC 2.4.2 x86_64-linux-gtk
> 2
> and I have problem at this code (/synunihighlighter/synunidesigner.pas):
>
> {$IFDEF SYN_LAZARUS}
> PageControl.ShowTabs:=false;
> {$ENDIF}
>
> It looks like that ShowTabs does not exi
2011/1/2 Sven Barth :
> On 02.01.2011 18:07, Bo Berglund wrote:
>>
>> But now I wonder if I should go for trunk or the fixes_0_9_28 branch?
>> If I remember correctly I have seen that the fixes_0_9_28 branch is no
>> longer maintained, is this really so?
Yes, it is not maintained anymore.
>> Is t
2011/1/1 Petr Hlozek :
> Dne 31.12.2010 16:08, Petr Hlozek napsal(a):
>>
> Hello Vincent,
>
> I just installed then same packages but for 32bit and it seems that your
> packages doesn't contain lazbuild utility.
>
> Petr
It is in the lcl-utils package. Did you install that?
>> I just installed th
2011/1/1 Alexander Klenin :
> Please, backport to 0.9.30 revisions:
>
> 28840 -- fixes http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=18328
> 28854 -- fixes http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=18348
Please, add them to
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Lazarus_0.9.30_release_plan#Merge_revisions_from_
2010/12/31 Petr Hlozek :
> Dne 31.12.2010 15:44, Vincent Snijders napsal(a):
>
> I just installed these debs from your link:
> lazarus-src-0.9.31_0.9.31-0-20101231_all.deb
> lazarus-doc-0.9.31_0.9.31-0-20101231_all.deb
> lazarus-ide-gtk2-0.9.31_0.9.31-0-20101231_amd64
2010/12/31 Frank Church :
>
>
> On 31 December 2010 13:32, Vincent Snijders
> wrote:
>>
>> > Is the source code for it available?
>>
>> The source for what exactly. It is all in svn and there are source
>> snapshots too,
>>
>> Vincent
> Is the source code for it available?
The source for what exactly. It is all in svn and there are source
snapshots too,
Vincent
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazar
2010/12/31 Juha Manninen :
> Hi
>
> I was asked the title's question but I don't really know the answer.
> So, compared to Tnt- unicode components for Delphi, or to the new Delphi
> unicode support. How is it?
It is the same as the new Delphi unicode support, I think. All GUI
components support un
Hi,
Yesterday some changes were made to the deb packaging. I would like to
know if anybody installed the Lazarus 0.9.31 deb packages today and if
there are any issues with them.
You can download them from
http://www.hu.freepascal.org/lazarus/
32 bits:
ftp://ftp.hu.freepascal.org/pub/lazarus/sna
2010/12/29 Peter E Williams :
> /usr/bin/ld: warning: ../link.res contains output sections; did you forget
> -T?
>
> I get the above warning a number of times. I think that the make file needs
> amending to add the -T option.
http://www.freepascal.org/faq.var#unix-ld219
Vincent
--
__
2010/12/29 Peter E Williams :
> I will study your reply. At the moment I am have problems actually finding
> fp and fpc binaries on my Mint 10 system (Linux).
Please, ask question about the fp binary on the fpc-pascal mailing
list[1], since it is off topic for this list. While you are at it, you
c
2010/12/29 Alexander Klenin :
> The historical version of TAChart, available at
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/lazarus-ccr/files/TAChart/
> is vastly outdated (2006) and may confuse newbie users.
>
> The most recent example of such confusion is
> http://www.hu.freepascal.org/fpcircbot/cgifpcbot?
2010/12/29 Alexander Klenin :
> The historical version of TAChart, available at
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/lazarus-ccr/files/TAChart/
> is vastly outdated (2006) and may confuse newbie users.
>
> The most recent example of such confusion is
> http://www.hu.freepascal.org/fpcircbot/cgifpcbot?
2010/12/26 Bart :
> Hi Vincent,
>
> Thanks for clearing that up.
>
> > The built-in target field is used for the Roadmap page in Mantis.
>
> I noticed that.
> I set the target to 0.9.30 of one bug, because it was a regression and
> used LazTarget instead of Target, which had no impact on the "road
2010/12/26 Andrew Haines :
> Hi,
>
> In my source editor when I right click, "Copy" is sometimes disabled
> even when text is selected. Ctrl+c works though.
>
> Anyone else?
Sounds like:
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=17565
Vincent
--
___
Lazar
2010/12/25 Bart :
> Hi,
>
> When setting the target for a bugreport, what is the difference
> between "Target" and "LazTarget"?
>
LazTarget was created before Mantis had a Target Field itself and is
used much the same way in custom query. The built-in target field is
used for the Roadmap page in M
2010/12/24 Alexander Klenin :
> On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 19:50, Vincent Snijders
> wrote:
>
>> Please test the Lazarus 0.9.29 snapshots for regressions compared with
>> Lazarus 0.9.28.2; These Lazarus 0.9.29 snapshots can be considered
>> release candidates for the upco
2010/12/24 cobines :
> Hi,
>
> Please consider reverting commit 25431 from 0.9.30. It fixes issue:
>
> http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=0015180
>
> but has some regressions.
>
> See new issue opened for explanation:
>
> http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=16742
>
What is worse?
Vincent
Hi,
Yesterday Lazarus trunk was branched to
http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/lazarus/branches/fixes_0_9_30/. From
this branch the next Lazarus release 0.9.30 will be released.
Further development takes place in
http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/lazarus/trunk/ , which contains version
0.9.31.
Snapshots
2010/12/22 Michael Joyner :
> The src rpm fails unpackaging with an CPIO checksum error.
>
I just ran cpio on the file from:
ftp://ftp.hu.freepascal.org/pub/lazarus/releases/Lazarus%20Linux%20SRC%20RPM/Lazarus%200.9.28.2/lazarus-0.9.28.2-0.src.rpm
fpc...@scenergyng:~/tmp/rpm$ rpm2cpio lazarus-0.9.
2010/12/22 Michael Joyner :
> The src rpm fails unpackaging with an CPIO checksum error.
>
>From which mirror did you download it?
Vincent
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/list
2010/12/22 Michael Joyner :
> If 9.28.2 is the current stable release how am I supposed to install it if
> you won't re-package it?
>
There are several options:
* Repackage it yourself. It would be nice if you tested it
succesfully, that you offered it to the community, so I can use it to
upload i
2010/12/22 Michael Joyner :
> when trying to install I get:
> =
> --> Running transaction check
> ---> Package lazarus.x86_64 0:0.9.28.2-0 set to be updated
> --> Finished Dependency Resolution
I won't repackage the 0.9.28.2 release, which is mor
Hi,
One of the issues scheduled to be fixed before next release is issue
16978: http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=16978
At this moment, none of the Lazarus developers could reproduce this
issue with the current Lazarus 0.9.29. Is there anybody, besides
Michael, who can reproduce it?
Please
2010/12/19 Graeme Geldenhuys :
> On 18 December 2010 22:56, Sven Barth wrote:
>>
>> When they shouldn't happen in trunk then where do you propose them to
>> happen?
>
> Exactly my point. Trunk is UNSTABLE - ALWAYS. So how can Vincent or
> any other developer think of cutting a "stable release" dire
2010/12/19 Brian Prentice :
> Vincent,
>
> That is a ridiculous statement and is one of the main reasons why this
> project is such a miserable failure. All formal releases should be stable.
> What is needed is a comprehensive test suit that covers all features of
> Lazarus. This test softwa
2010/12/18 Graeme Geldenhuys :
> To Vincent,
>
> This is the exact thing I am talking about. Saying a "stable release"
> is a few weeks away, things like this should not be happening in
> Trunk. The mailing list is full of such reports.
>
I guess I am eager to release when it is ready. If it is re
2010/12/18 Graeme Geldenhuys :
> On 18 December 2010 14:18, Sven Barth wrote:
>> With the new release of FPC out in the wild I now hope that the developers
>> will do a new release (0.9.30) in the near future :)
>
> For all intense purposes, that is only possible once Lazarus 0.9.29
> actually bec
2010/12/17 Piffle the Cat :
> Hi All,
>
> Will someone please fix the Source Forge archives so that 0.9.28.0 is
> deleted! and replaced with 0.9.28.2
>
Where did you look for rpms?
64 bits:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/lazarus/files/Lazarus%20Linux%20x86_64%20RPM/
32 bits:
http://sourceforge.
2010/12/18 patspiper :
> I cannot rebuild lazarus:
>
> /usr/bin/make -C synedit clean
> make[2]: Entering directory
> `/home/me/Programs/lazarus/lazarus-svn/components/synedit'
> Makefile:198: *** The Makefile doesn't support target i386-linux, please run
> fpcmake first. Stop.
> make[2]: Leaving
2010/12/16 Michael Schnell :
>>> (which supposedly is rewritten
>>> by any new fpc install)
>>
>> This is an incorrect assumption.
>>
> Hmm. how else would have been written there. I do the compiling and
> installing of fpc as root, but I always start Lazarus as a normal user. So
> only installing
2010/12/16 Michael Schnell :
> On 12/16/2010 10:05 AM, Andreas Schneider wrote:
>>
>> (fpc -va)
>>
>>
>
> Thanks a lot. This results in
>
> [0.019] Configfile search: /home/mschnell/.fpc.cfg
> [0.019] Configfile search: /usr/lib/fpc/etc/fpc.cfg
> [0.019] Configfile search: /etc/fpc.cfg
> [0.019] R
2010/12/15 Erwin van den Bosch :
> Hello,
>
> I'm getting compile errors on the current SVN on Windows 7 x64 / fpc 2.4.3.
>
> Error: Can't overide method Realloc. No Int64 ...etc
I think your fpc 2.4.3 is not up to date.
Vincent
--
___
Lazarus mail
2010/12/13 Mattias Gaertner :
> On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 08:30:03 +0100
> Torsten Bonde Christiansen wrote:
>
>> Hi List.
>>
>> The lazarus trunk is no longer compilable with 2.4.0 as of revision 28681.
>>
>> It seem that the file "idecontexthelpedit.pas" uses the method
>> "UnitName" which was introdu
2010/12/9 Michael Schnell :
> On 12/03/2010 08:10 PM, Marco van de Voort wrote:
>>
>> Don't mix versions unless you know very well what you are doing.
>
> I am not aware of using any mixes versions.
>
> The installed FPC version is the one from the svn. To compile same I do have
> an old version of
2010/12/8 Birger Jansen :
> Hi all,
>
> I encounter a strange behaviour with controls that are placed inside a
> statusbar. Take the following steps to reproduce:
>
> - create a new application with a form
> - add a statusbar
> - add a progressbar
> - add this to the OnCreate event of the form
2010/12/7 Dimitrios Chr. Ioannidis :
> Στις 7/12/2010 10:52 πμ, ο/η Lukasz Sokol έγραψε:
>
> On 06/12/2010 20:11, Dimitrios Chr. Ioannidis wrote:
>
> Στις 6/12/2010 9:57 μμ, ο/η Vincent Snijders έγραψε:
>
> This mail, http://www.mail-archive.com/laza...@miraclec.com/msg06878
2010/12/6 Dimitrios Chr. Ioannidis :
> This is why a Free Pascal / Lazarus/ "FP&L" / ObjectFlorian Pascal ( ;) ) (
> pick your TLA ) Foundation comes in sight ...
This mail, http://www.mail-archive.com/laza...@miraclec.com/msg06878.html
is stil up to date. Users, feel free to unite and create a fo
2010/12/6 zeljko :
> On Monday 06 December 2010 14:02, Vincent Snijders wrote:
>> 2010/12/6 Alexsander Rosa
>>
>> > Back to the topic: I think the Lazarus project could SELL products like
>> > this:
>> > http://shop.canonical.com/product_info.php
2010/12/6 Alexsander Rosa
> Back to the topic: I think the Lazarus project could SELL products like
> this:
> http://shop.canonical.com/product_info.php?products_id=648
>
You mean like: http://www.cafepress.com/miraclec
Michael, how many did you sell over the years?
Vincent
--
___
2010/12/5 Bo Berglund :
> On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 22:58:43 +, Henry Vermaak
> wrote:
>
>>On 3 December 2010 22:29, Bo Berglund wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2 Dec 2010 18:19:12 -0300, Osvaldo Filho
>>> wrote:
>>>
Is Firebird really free?
>>>
>>> What exactly is FIREBIRD
>>
>>http://lmgtfy.com/?
2010/12/1 Michael Schnell :
> a Browser, ...). As we are in a Pascal oriented list, here, only CIL-Pascal
> is relevant.
Actually this is a Lazarus list, so until FPC support CIL-pascal,
CIL-pascal is irrelevant here.
Vincent
--
___
Lazarus mailing lis
2010/12/1 Darius Blaszyk :
> Ahhh, found it. By setting the window option from "Default" to "Restore
> window geometry" everything works fine now. I'm surprised though it used
> to work by restoring the geometry. What does "default" mean?
I think default means the designed position of those IDE fo
2010/11/29 zeljko :
> On Monday 29 November 2010 10:48, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
>> * Focused items in list views, treeviews etc have grey background and grey
>> text, so when I have an item selected, I can't read it. This occurs in
>> Messages Window, any treeview in the IDE (treeviews are used al
2010/11/28 Bo Berglund :
> On Sun, 28 Nov 2010 22:14:32 +0100, Vincent Snijders
> wrote:
>
>>2010/11/28 Bo Berglund :
>>> On Sun, 28 Nov 2010 21:47:01 +0100, Vincent Snijders
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>
>>Use lazarus 0.9.29 from trunk.
>
2010/11/28 Bo Berglund :
> On Sun, 28 Nov 2010 21:47:01 +0100, Vincent Snijders
> wrote:
>
>>2010/11/28 Bo Berglund :
>>> All of this is on Windows XP SP3 in a VMWare virtual machine.
>>> Originally I installed Lazarus + FPC from the downloadable setup file
>&g
2010/11/28 Bo Berglund :
> All of this is on Windows XP SP3 in a VMWare virtual machine.
> Originally I installed Lazarus + FPC from the downloadable setup file
> for Windows. It installed FPC 2.2.4 and Lazarus 0.9.28.2.
>
> Then I have installed the FPC version 2.4.2 and also retrieved the
> Lazar
2010/11/28 Bo Berglund :
> On Fri, 26 Nov 2010 20:55:19 +, Martin wrote:
>
>>> 3. Design them as DLLs initially - I suspect that will bring along a
>>> different set of problems.
>>>
>>> Once they are well tested I can incorporate them into the main
>>> executables.
>>
>>Yes splitting your pro
2010/11/26 Martin :
> On 26/11/2010 10:52, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Revision 28494 in the cmdlinedebugger.pp (Martin) breaks compiling on
>> Linux.
>> GetTickCount is a windows-only call.
>>
>> Please fix this ASAP.
>
> Is there any similar thing on linux?Now() can go backwards (g
2010/8/30 Marcos Douglas :
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Marcos Douglas wrote:
>> For the first time I tried to add the package lazreport but I got this
>> error:
>> Unable to load package "lazreport (> = 8.00)"
>>
>> Steps I did:
>> 1 - I clicked in menu: Package > Install/Uninstall package
2010/11/20 Dimitrios Chr. Ioannidis :
> Στις 20/11/2010 1:27 μμ, ο/η Vincent Snijders έγραψε:
>>
>> 2010/11/20 Dimitrios Chr. Ioannidis:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> i realize that Lazarus is a "hobby" / volunteers project but is it
2010/11/20 Luiz Americo Pereira Camara :
> Paul Ishenin escreveu:
>>
>> 20.11.2010 8:49, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara wrote:
>>>
>>> VirtualTreeView paints the background in black. This occurs because it
>>> assigns the TControl.Color to a temp bitmap brush.
>>>
>>> Not big deal since i can change C
2010/11/20 Dimitrios Chr. Ioannidis :
> Hi all,
>
> i realize that Lazarus is a "hobby" / volunteers project but is it possible
> to use some sort of Continuous Integration
> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuous_integration ) ?
>
> I used Bamboo for a while, 4 years ago, and it was definit
2010/11/19 Birger Jansen :
> Hi all,
>
> I have a TPanel on a TForm and an event on the TForm.OnMouseWheel. This works
> when I use the mousewheel on the form. But as soon as the cursor is over the
> TPanel, the OnMouseWheel event on the parent form is not triggered. Since the
> TPanel has no On
2010/11/18 Andrew Brunner :
> I was wondering how I can "make" Lazarus build with specific packages.
> Right now I need lazdaemon installed in the ide when I use make clean
> bigide.
Try make idepkg, e.g.
make clean all
make idepkg
Vincent
--
___
Laza
2010/11/18 Andrew Brunner :
> I was wondering how I can "make" Lazarus build with specific packages.
> Right now I need lazdaemon installed in the ide when I use make clean
> bigide.
Try make idepkg, e.g.
make clean all
make idepkg
Vincent
--
___
Laza
2010/11/17 faber :
> I get error when install lazarus from daily snapshot
> Lazarus-0.9.29-28261-fpc-2.4.3-20101116-win32.exe
>
> Message error:
> The component editor of class "TDefaultComponentEditor" has created the error:
> "Unable to find method. Please fix error shown in the message window."
2010/11/17 Alexsander Rosa :
> I'm using Synapse from SVN and it has hundreds of hints. I do not want to
> turn hints off for everything, just for Synapse's path. Is there a way to do
> this?
Create a lazarus package for Synapse. In the custom compiler options
of the package add -vh-
Vincent
--
2010/11/13 Christof Kluß :
> Hi,
>
> I installed the recent Lazarus snapshot, but when I try to compile my
> project I get the error message
>
> C:\lazarus\lcl\fileutil.pas(237,2) Fatal: Can't open include file
> "fileutil.inc"
>
> I tried
> Lazarus-0.9.28.3-27726-fpc-2.4.0-20101017-win32.exe
> Laz
2010/11/10 Joost van der Sluis :
> Hi all,
>
> I've been playing to build some more user-friendly download page with
> installation instructions.
>
> Before I continue, I would like to know whay you guys find of the basic
> idea:
>
> http://www.lazarussupport.com/tmp/index.psp/Compiler?section2=Dow
2010/11/9 Bo Berglund :
> On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 18:08:02 +, Henry Vermaak
> wrote:
>>Show us some screenshots of how it looks now and how you want it to look.
>>
>
> How can I show screenshots in a newsgroup?
> I don't have a webserver to put them on...
If you were sending regular emails, you ca
2010/11/8 Graeme Geldenhuys :
> Hi,
>
> I just got this message after trying to compile my project. It seems no
> matter what I pick, it's not going to be the answer I want. Should the
> prompt be Yes/No instead?
>
>
> I'm using Laz 0.9.29 updated from the repository on 2010-11-02. Compiled
> with
2010/11/5 Andrea Mauri :
> Dear all,
> I installed lazarus on my new 64 bit pc (Lazarus 0.9.29 r28069 FPC 2.4.0
> i386-win32-win32/win64).
> If I create a new project, an empty form, and I compile it for Win64 x86_64
> (defined in project options destination SO and target cpu family), the
> project
2010/11/4 Bo Berglund :
> On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 18:35:19 +0100, Bo Berglund
> wrote:
>
> Just a follow-up:
> I made a small utility to find a file on path and used it on the PC
> where Lazarus is installed.
> Result:
>
> C:\findfile make.exe
> C:\Programs\Borland\BDS\4.0\Bin\make.exe
> C:\Programs\B
2010/11/4 Joshua Lim :
> Hi Vincent, thanks, in that case, any indication when the next laz will be
> released?
>
I guess (just an indication), some time in the next 6 months.
Vincent
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
htt
2010/11/2 Joshua Lim :
> Hi, any thoughts when Laz with fpc 2.4.0 be released? Thanks.
>
>
There won't be a release of Lazarus with fpc 2.4.0. The next Lazarus
release will be built with fpc 2.4.2.
Vincent
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.laz
2010/11/2 Graeme Geldenhuys :
> Hi,
>
> Can somebody please remove all the previous (old) patches. This latest one
> replaces them all.
Done.
Vincent
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/m
2010/10/30 Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho :
> You can create a package which adds a new kind of new application in the
> dialog.
>
> This option cannot be added by default because it will mess very badly
> with the LCL unicode support.
>
It could only be added if the application has already -Fcutf8
2010/10/27 Graeme Geldenhuys :
> Op 2010-10-27 14:49, Hans-Peter Diettrich het geskryf:
>>
>> Not so for file dropping (WM_DROPFILES).
>
>
> File dropping (URI lists) are just a small part of drag-n-drop. Either
> way, does LCL actually have a platform independent API or component events
> you can
2010/10/12 Marco van de Voort
>
> Hello,
>
> We have placed the first release-candidate of the Free Pascal Compiler
> version 2.4.2 on our ftp-servers.
>
> You can help improve the upcoming 2.4.2 release by downloading and
> testing this release.
I tested the i386-linux debs on on ubuntu 10.4. Th
Hi,
I got the errors on the lazarus test suite down to one, only the
easydockmgrdsgn package fails to compile.
How can this be fixed?
Free Pascal Compiler version 2.5.1 [2010/10/18] for i386
Copyright (c) 1993-2010 by Florian Klaempfl
Target OS: Win32 for i386
Compiling easydockmgrdsgn.pas
Compil
2010/10/26 Bo Berglund
> On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 11:23:09 +0200, Marco van de Voort
> wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 11:01:19PM +0200, Thierry B. wrote:
> >> > > Where is the Indy 9 for freepascal/lazarus ?
> >> There isn't one. Indy 9 never supported FPC.
> >
> >This is wrong. There is a port
2010/10/25 Florian Klaempfl :
> Am 25.10.2010 11:10, schrieb Alexander Klenin:
>> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 19:52, Marco van de Voort wrote:
>>> What I haven't seen:
>>> - the problem
>>
>> Lazarus project is unable to do releases in a timely manner.
>>
>>> - the solution
>>
>> Make a releases time-
2010/10/25 Graeme Geldenhuys :
> Op 2010-10-25 10:22, Marco van de Voort het geskryf:
>>
>> Such schemes only work in retrospect. With 20 people all having a couple of
>> pet projects you are quickly talking hundreds of branches.
>
> So what's the problem with that?
No, there is a limit on the num
2010/10/22 patspiper :
> The FPC user manual states the compiler will look for a configuration file
> fpc.cfg in the following places:
> • Under UNIX (such as LINUX)
> 1. The current directory.
> 2. Your home directory, it looks for .fpc.cfg.
> 3. The directory specified in the environment variable
2010/10/22 Frank Church :
>
>
> Are there some FPC/Lazarus class for logging events?
Some kind of writeln is DebugLn:
http://wiki.freepascal.org/Lazarus_Faq#How_can_I_see_debug_output.3F
Vincent
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepa
2010/10/22 Juha Manninen :
> Hi
>
> I would like to suggest again a new release policy. It would have timely
> releases, meaning a new release after a fixed time period, at a predefined
> date.
> Some projects have a 3 months cycle but a 6 months would be enough for Lazarus
> because of more limit
2010/10/22 Birger Jansen :
> Hi,
>
> In Delphi you can overload the Explicit operator. This makes is possible to
> have a type TTypeX and TTypeY and cast one into the other. To do that,
> implement an operator overloader:
> operator Explicit(const AValue: TTypeX): TTypeY.
> // implement convers
Hi,
>From time to time the find declaration doesn't work in my Lazarus. If
I go the Unit info -> Source paths, I see this list:
C:\lazarus\source\lazarus\components\fpcunit
C:\lazarus\source\lazarus\components\synedit\units\i386-win32
C:\lazarus\source\lazarus\ideintf\units\i386-win32
C:\lazarus\s
Hi,
If you build a project which uses an outputdirectory for its
executable, e.g. lazarus\examples\bidi\project1.lpi, Lazarus (the IDE)
creates the lib\i386-win32 directory, if you build the project for
windows.
LazBuild doesn't create the output directory. I think it should create
it, just like
2010/10/21 Henry Vermaak :
> On 21/10/10 11:50, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
>>
>> Op 2010-10-21 12:40, Henry Vermaak het geskryf:
>>>
>>> It will add more confusion if people discuss a patch/screenshot in the
>>> notes and you delete that patch later on. Traceability and history is
>>> important in b
2010/10/21 Graeme Geldenhuys :
>
> Anyway, as I mentioned in that mantis report I am happily using that
> feature without problems, so it's your (end-users of Lazarus IDE) loss. I
> think it's a useful feature to have, and others agreed.
Yes, I think the consensus is that is a useful feature (
2010/10/21 Graeme Geldenhuys :
> I also wrote a File Filter Mask ide add-on which allows you to customize
> and define your own file filters that appear in any "File Open" dialog of
> Lazarus IDE, but that patch is still not accepted for whatever reason
> (though I use it here locally for ages).
I
2010/10/21 Graeme Geldenhuys :
> Op 2010-10-21 09:03, Vincent Snijders het geskryf:
>>
>> Can you copy paste the output?
>
> attached is a archive that contains the xml results file.
>
>
Thanks. It is clear that we need better failure mesages. I a
2010/10/21 Graeme Geldenhuys :
> Op 2010-10-20 16:42, Vincent Snijders het geskryf:
>>
>> Does this solve the more than 100 failures in the lazarus test suite too?
>
>
> No, the issues are not related.
>
No how many errors did you get now?
Can you copy
2010/10/20 Graeme Geldenhuys :
>
> I found the problem! :-)
> The drive Windows and Lazarus is installed on, ran out of space in the
> linking phase. Windows 2000 never reported that it is out of space, so it
> never even occurred to me to look. By pure chance I saw I have 100 odd MB
> free on dri
2010/10/20 Graeme Geldenhuys :
> Op 2010-10-20 15:11, Andrew Brunner het geskryf:
>>
>> Hmm... When using lazarus from /trunk you should be more open to
>> discussing/resolving/reporting issues with respect to leaps in
>> features such as smart space/tabs.
>
> Do a Mantis search, I think I report m
2010/10/19 Graeme Geldenhuys :
> Hi,
>
> I don't know how frequent these are run or looked at, but I used
> yesterday's FPC 2.4.2rc1 and Lazarus 0.9.29 snapshot (that Vincent release)
> under Windows 2000, and got all these test failures...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
2010/10/18 Michael Schnell :
> On 10/18/2010 04:42 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
>>
>> Ehm... "unit libc" <> "interfacing/using libc". The libc unit is a relict
>> from Kylix times and is basically i386 only. But interfacing with/using libc
>> is not a bad thing (TM) per se.
>>
> I do agree. I was not com
2010/10/12 Marco van de Voort :
> Hello,
>
> We have placed the first release-candidate of the Free Pascal Compiler
> version 2.4.2 on our ftp-servers.
>
> You can help improve the upcoming 2.4.2 release by downloading and
> testing this release. If you want you can report what you have done here:
2010/10/14 Bo Berglund :
> I got fpc-2.4.0.i386-win32 released in Dec 2009 from SF.
> I also got the combined lazarus-0.9.28.2-fpc-2.2.4-win32 with an
> earlier release.
> Both are binary installers.
>
> If I run the FPC installer I will get 2.4.0 and if I then run the
> Lazarus installer it may or
2010/10/13 Graeme Geldenhuys :
> On 13 October 2010 18:32, Reimar Grabowski wrote:
>>
>> Once you found these ways the quality of the debugger gets less important
>> as the debugger sees less use.
>
> And that to me seems like the wrong way of approaching the problem.
> Treat the cause of the probl
2010/10/13 Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho :
> Plus, the tooltips always work for me. Maybe because I very rarely use
> the data type Char.
I don't the problem is not the data type char, but that somewhere in
the debugger tool chain (from lazarus tool-tips front end to the gdb
backend using the fpc ge
2010/10/13 Frank Church :
> I posted this article - Observations on FreePascal and Lazarus Development
> on my blog a few days ago, but because I haven't started any concrete work
I added the blog to:
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Lazarus_Documentation#Lazarus_related_blogs_and_websites
I ho
2010/10/13 Graeme Geldenhuys :
>
> Such basic features really should work in any IDE. If we can't trust the
> debugger, who can we trust?
>
But in fact they really don't work in complex cases as indexed string
expression evaluation.
You can not trust a debugger. You can trust output to the consol
2010/10/12 Bo Berglund :
> I asked about the installation files for Windows in a previous thread
> but the responses were directed towards building myself and it looks
> like a very hard undertaking, especially on Windows. The pages
> referenced discuss how to get sources, setting up compiler optio
401 - 500 of 925 matches
Mail list logo
