On 04.03.2011 20:36, ABorka wrote:
On 3/4/2011 09:54, Vincent Snijders wrote:
2011/3/4 Vincent Snijdersvincent.snijd...@gmail.com:
If you use lazarus trunk svn head,with fpc trunk, you must use fpc
trunk *svn head* too. You did not, so your fpc 2.5.1 was too old.
So, if you update lazarus
On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 11:58:21AM +0100, Sven Barth wrote:
That's why I do it the following way:
I have one directory for FPC and one for Lazarus which are the SVN
working copies (but I'm not working in them). When I do an update I
export that working copy to a build directory and build
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 02:24, Mattias Gaertner
nc-gaert...@netcologne.de wrote:
On Fri, 4 Mar 2011 13:17:45 -0300
Alexsander Rosa alexsander.r...@gmail.com wrote:
AFAIK, Lazarus 0.9.30 will be the last Lazarus release able to be compiled
with an official FPC release. The current Lazarus trunk
Am 04.03.2011 14:42, schrieb Marco van de Voort:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:23:44AM -0300, Alexsander Rosa wrote:
Ok, thanks. The bugtrack roadmap page has 3.0.0 only, probably I was
looking in the wrong place.
See http://www.freepascal.org/faq.var#versions for a short summary about
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 02:56:21PM +0100, Sven Barth wrote:
That being said, specially when branching a major branch, it is hard to get
an overview what has been added but not merged (for e.g. the release
manifest), and some more administration on this front wouldn't be bad.
Something
AFAIK, Lazarus 0.9.30 will be the last Lazarus release able to be compiled
with an official FPC release. The current Lazarus trunk needs FPC 2.5.1 and
FPC 2.6.0 is going to be released in a distant future. So we have, for the
first time, a gap: you can't be partly bleeding-edge anymore. Before
2011/3/4 Alexsander Rosa alexsander.r...@gmail.com:
The current Lazarus trunk needs FPC 2.5.1 and
FPC 2.6.0 is going to be released in a distant future. So we have, for the
first time, a gap: you can't be partly bleeding-edge anymore.
I am sure that Lazarus SVN compiles with FPC 2.4.2 in Linux
On Fri, 4 Mar 2011 13:17:45 -0300
Alexsander Rosa alexsander.r...@gmail.com wrote:
AFAIK, Lazarus 0.9.30 will be the last Lazarus release able to be compiled
with an official FPC release. The current Lazarus trunk needs FPC 2.5.1
Why do you think so?
It compiles with 2.4.2.
Mattias
--
A few weeks ago, when 0.9.30 fixes was branched, I've tried to compile
Lazarus trunk with a released FPC and it failed. At the same time, someone
else complained here with the same error I had and the answer was:
11.01.2011 21:03, Dave Coventry wrote:
On Ubuntu 10.10 I've run the following
2011/3/4 Alexsander Rosa alexsander.r...@gmail.com:
A few weeks ago, when 0.9.30 fixes was branched, I've tried to compile
Lazarus trunk with a released FPC and it failed. At the same time, someone
else complained here with the same error I had and the answer was:
compileroptions.pp(427,14)
2011/3/4 Vincent Snijders vincent.snijd...@gmail.com:
If you use lazarus trunk svn head,with fpc trunk, you must use fpc
trunk *svn head* too. You did not, so your fpc 2.5.1 was too old.
So, if you update lazarus and compilation fails with fpc 2.5.1, you
must update fpc too.
Vincent
--
Will it be 2.5.2, 2.6.0 or 3.0.0 ? I'm curious.
--
Atenciosamente,
Alexsander da Rosa
http://rednaxel.com
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Op 2011-02-28 14:49, Alexsander Rosa het geskryf:
Will it be 2.5.2, 2.6.0 or 3.0.0 ? I'm curious.
Michael van Canneyt told me this morning it will be FPC 2.4.4, and will
be released really soon.
Regards,
- Graeme -
--
fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolkit using Free Pascal
Am 28.02.2011 13:53, schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys:
Michael van Canneyt told me this morning it will be FPC 2.4.4, and will
be released really soon.
Before or after 0.9.30 release of Lazarus?
Michael
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
But will it be able to compile Lazarus from SVN/trunk?
In other words, will 2.5.1 be released as 2.4.4 ?
2011/2/28 Graeme Geldenhuys graemeg.li...@gmail.com
Op 2011-02-28 14:49, Alexsander Rosa het geskryf:
Will it be 2.5.2, 2.6.0 or 3.0.0 ? I'm curious.
Michael van Canneyt told me this
On Mon, 28 Feb 2011, Alexsander Rosa wrote:
But will it be able to compile Lazarus from SVN/trunk?
In other words, will 2.5.1 be released as 2.4.4 ?
No.
2.4.4 is a fixes release of 2.4.4.
2.5.1 is scheduled for release as 2.6.0. When this will be is unknown at
this time.
Michael.
--
Ok, thanks. The bugtrack roadmap page has 3.0.0 only, probably I was
looking in the wrong place.
Where do I find the roadmap for 2.6.0? Is there a way to filter the issues
list to show what's missing?
2011/2/28 michael.vancann...@wisa.be
On Mon, 28 Feb 2011, Alexsander Rosa wrote:
But will
17 matches
Mail list logo
