I've done all this, but at the very beginning of the compilation, I get:
make[2]: *** [../../units/i386-linux/qt] Error 1
and it gives up.
Using debian stable, kde 3.5.9/10. Tried with the packaged lazarus
0.9.28.2-0 as well as svn
$ /sbin/ldconfig -p | grep qt
libqt4intf.so.5 (libc6)
2009/11/14 David W Noon :
> On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 23:47:10 +0100, Marc Weustink wrote about Re:
> [Lazarus] make option -j:
>
> [snip]
>> All lcl units are compiled by fpc through the allunits.pp
>> "project" (we use this to let fpc figure out the dependencies)
>> The same counts for the ide.
>>
>> I
2009/11/13 Graeme Geldenhuys :
> 2009/11/13 Phil Hess :
>>
>> Consider the Preferences dialog in Mac Leopard's Mail client:
>>
>> http://web.fastermac.net/~MacPgmr/Lazarus/Screenshots/mail_prefs.jpg
>
> Did you notice the "color quoted text" comboboxes in the lower left
> are not equally spaced. I
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 23:47:10 +0100, Marc Weustink wrote about Re:
[Lazarus] make option -j:
[snip]
> All lcl units are compiled by fpc through the allunits.pp
> "project" (we use this to let fpc figure out the dependencies)
> The same counts for the ide.
>
> I hope when specifying -j2 it builds t
>> > Either an old lrs file or a resource with the same name exists
This must have been the reason. I added *.lrs to the global ignore
for TortoiseSVN on my client box. Then I deleted *.lrs from SVN.
Then I deleted *.lrs from my local box. Commited changes. And it it
found the latest and greate
On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 00:36:25 +0200
ik wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Since Lazarus 0.9.28 there is a hint of FPCDoc .
> The hint is a popup window with some sort of TSynEdit (?).
Normally it is a TLabel.
If you install the turbopower ipro package, it is html component.
> Is there a way to make them "st
Alexander Kaupp wrote:
Hello all,
I dont know if everyone knows this:
I have a dualcore CPU now and was wondering how to use both cores for
compiling for example lazarus.
make -j2 all
uses both cpus and works great with lazarus :)
for a quad-core use option: -j4
hope someone finds this u
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:41:33 -0600
Andrew Brunner wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Mattias Gaertner
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:24:08 -0600
> > Andrew Brunner wrote:
>
> > Do you have four different folder and each contains the whole
> > project, or do you share some files?
>
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Mattias Gaertner
wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:24:08 -0600
> Andrew Brunner wrote:
> Do you have four different folder and each contains the whole project,
> or do you share some files?
The each project are stand alone project file and nothing else is in
each
Hello,
Since Lazarus 0.9.28 there is a hint of FPCDoc .
The hint is a popup window with some sort of TSynEdit (?).
Is there a way to make them "sticky" so when I leave the symbol that it
display the information, it will still be visible and I could even scroll it
?
Thanks,
Ido
http://ik.homelinu
Good eye! No, this is the OS X Mail client.
I think one of the things that make the Mac pleasing is that it appears as
though their aesthetic includes the injection of just a tiny bit of, well, joy
for lack of a better word.
Examples with the Mail dialog:
Note that the title of this panel is "
2009/11/13 Phil Hess :
>
> Consider the Preferences dialog in Mac Leopard's Mail client:
>
> http://web.fastermac.net/~MacPgmr/Lazarus/Screenshots/mail_prefs.jpg
Did you notice the "color quoted text" comboboxes in the lower left
are not equally spaced. I gather that is not an app shipped by Apple
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:13:23 +0100 (CET)
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I implemented support for a sometext tag in
> fpdoc (Revision 14167). It can be used to include arbitrary links in
> fpdoc documentation. It's documented in the current docs.
>
> Maybe lazdoc should be adapted to s
Hi,
you are right :) I am happy to see both cpu/cores doing the compiling :)
greetings
alex
Am Freitag, den 13.11.2009, 18:43 + schrieb David W Noon:
> On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:38:20 +0100, Alexander Kaupp wrote about
> [Lazarus] make option -j:
>
> > I dont know if everyone knows this:
> >
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:24:08 -0600
Andrew Brunner wrote:
> I just encountered the most strangest problem. I've got a situation
> where form changes I make in the IDE do not effect the form in the
> actual exe. I didn't have this problem on Linux. I just noticed this
> problem when I created an
2009/11/13 Brian Prentice :
> I use a three button mouse as I suspect most people do since such a mouse is
> included with the computer!
> Brian
Phil wanted to point, that one-mouse button was provided with original
Apple Macs, for very long time.
To access context menu ctrl+click was used. Eventu
Brian,
I have a one-button mouse that was included with my Mac.
Thanks.
-Phil
- "Brian Prentice" wrote:
> Not sure if I understand what the problem is. With a one-button mouse
> you simulate right-click with Ctrl+click. I've haven't noticed any
> problems with it.
>
>
> Phil,
>
>
> I
Not sure if I understand what the problem is. With a one-button mouse
you simulate right-click with Ctrl+click. I've haven't noticed any
problems with it.
Phil,
I use a three button mouse as I suspect most people do since such a
mouse is included with the computer!
Brian
--
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:38:20 +0100, Alexander Kaupp wrote about
[Lazarus] make option -j:
> I dont know if everyone knows this:
>
> I have a dualcore CPU now and was wondering how to use both cores for
> compiling for example lazarus.
>
> make -j2 all
>
> uses both cpus and works great with laz
Not sure if I understand what the problem is. With a one-button mouse you
simulate right-click with Ctrl+click. I've haven't noticed any problems with it.
Thanks.
-Phil
- "Brian Prentice" wrote:
> Here is a little test program:
>
> http://linuxenvy.com/bprentice/Lazarus
>
> which demons
I just encountered the most strangest problem. I've got a situation
where form changes I make in the IDE do not effect the form in the
actual exe. I didn't have this problem on Linux. I just noticed this
problem when I created an SVN (subversion ubuntu x64) repository for
my project. Once that w
This email is somehow blocked by mailman, so I forward it to the list.
Jonathan schreef:
Gentoo still offers Lazarus version 0.9.26.
I have filed a version bump request and written a ebuild for Lazarus version
0.9.28.2.
You can speed up the fixing of this bug by voting for the version bump bug
Here is a little test program:
http://linuxenvy.com/bprentice/Lazarus
which demonstrates that the left mouse button is not detected
correctly. Clicking the Left mouse button with the Ctrl key depressed
produces Right Ctrl and clicking the Left mouse button with the Alt
key depressed produ
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009, Phil Hess wrote:
I thought the default look of Ext JS was an improvement over the qooxdoo
JavaScript widgets used by Delphi for PHP.
Looks: yes, absolutely - it looks fresh and modern.
Layout: Not so good.
The toolkits behaviour when adding html and resizing the brows
Hi Ido,
i tested it on fpc-2.2.4 src
It seem that it works partial with FPC. Maybe the problem is that the -j
option means that 2 tagets will be processed in parallel, if it is
possible.
I think with FPC it is not allways possible. Compiling works but not all
CPUs are used all the time.
greeting
I thought the default look of Ext JS was an improvement over the qooxdoo
JavaScript widgets used by Delphi for PHP.
Thanks.
-Phil
- "Michael Van Canneyt" wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Nov 2009, Hess, Philip J wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > From: Hans-Peter Diettrich
Does it actually works with FPC ?
Ido
http://ik.homelinux.org/
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 6:38 PM, Alexander Kaupp wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I dont know if everyone knows this:
>
> I have a dualcore CPU now and was wondering how to use both cores for
> compiling for example lazarus.
>
> make -j2 a
Hello all,
I dont know if everyone knows this:
I have a dualcore CPU now and was wondering how to use both cores for
compiling for example lazarus.
make -j2 all
uses both cpus and works great with lazarus :)
for a quad-core use option: -j4
hope someone finds this useful
regards
alex
--
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009, Hess, Philip J wrote:
From: Hans-Peter Diettrich [drdiettri...@aol.com]
Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 6:14 AM
To: grae...@opensoft.homeip.net; Lazarus mailing list
Subject: Re: [Lazarus] cross platform [Re: Lazarus Goal]
This
Hi,
I implemented support for a sometext tag in fpdoc
(Revision 14167).
It can be used to include arbitrary links in fpdoc documentation. It's documented in the
current docs.
Maybe lazdoc should be adapted to support it ?
Michael.
--
___
Lazarus
There's a bit more to UI design than layouts. Unfortunately this brings up the
idea of "aesthetic", something that many developers are vocally uncomfortable
with (i.e. challenged).
Consider the Preferences dialog in Mac Leopard's Mail client:
http://web.fastermac.net/~MacPgmr/Lazarus/Screenshot
On Friday 13 November 2009 16:35, Juha Manninen wrote:
> > http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/Qt_Interface
>
> Looking at the Roadmap page it seems that QT bindings are equally or even
> better implemented than GTK2 bindings. So why is it made more difficult to
> install? "libqt4intf.so"
From: Hans-Peter Diettrich [drdiettri...@aol.com]
Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 6:14 AM
To: grae...@opensoft.homeip.net; Lazarus mailing list
Subject: Re: [Lazarus] cross platform [Re: Lazarus Goal]
>This is an argument for a Web (Delphi IntraWeb?) layo
> http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/Qt_Interface
Looking at the Roadmap page it seems that QT bindings are equally or even
better implemented than GTK2 bindings. So why is it made more difficult to
install? "libqt4intf.so" could be included in the SVN source tree and in
release pack
From: Juha Manninen [juha.manni...@phnet.fi]
Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 9:01 AM
To: lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
Subject: Re: [Lazarus] Documentation of Lazarus internals
>I was planning to look at the Delphi converter more. I need to learn qu
On Friday 13 November 2009 16:09, Juha Manninen wrote:
> On perjantai, 13. marraskuuta 2009 09:29:20 zeljko wrote:
> > On Thursday 12 November 2009 20:05, David Emerson wrote:
> > > Juha Manninen wrote:
> > > > I compiled the whole Lazarus to use QT widgets and it works! Yes.
> > >
> > > I've been
On perjantai, 13. marraskuuta 2009 09:29:20 zeljko wrote:
> On Thursday 12 November 2009 20:05, David Emerson wrote:
> > Juha Manninen wrote:
> > > I compiled the whole Lazarus to use QT widgets and it works! Yes.
> >
> > I've been wanting to do the same, though I failed at my previous
> > attempt.
> My co-workers hate touching my computer, because I have my keyboard set
> to Dvorak, but the actual keyboard keys-caps are still in QWERTY.
That is geeky, I must say. Wow!
Juha
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://
Graeme Geldenhuys schreef:
Hi,
Has anybody seen this already. It's a software company called
PilotLogic, that uses a rebranded (only in some of the screenshots)
Lazarus. It includes a custom installation of FPC + Lazarus and various
included extra components. They also seem to have a lot more d
Hi,
Has anybody seen this already. It's a software company called
PilotLogic, that uses a rebranded (only in some of the screenshots)
Lazarus. It includes a custom installation of FPC + Lazarus and various
included extra components. They also seem to have a lot more demos included.
I'm glad to s
On perjantai, 13. marraskuuta 2009 08:32:22 Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> There are examples in components/codetools/examples.
Ok, I will look at them more closely.
> > It would be nice to look at a class diagram, then a use case diagram
> > and then maybe a sequence diagram to get an idea of how i
Graeme Geldenhuys schrieb:
Some quick examples were applications don't follow the "look & feel"
rules of the platform, yet users have no problems in using them.
* Windows Media Player.
I cannot use the media player or media center, due to its aberration
from any application look&feel. Somebo
Graeme Geldenhuys schrieb:
probably know Java has solved this problem nicely with layout
managers. If layout managers were implemented in Lazarus the IDE
I fully agree, layout managers (or even only one layout manager) would
solve this problem. LCL has Anchors (a lot more advanced compared t
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
>
> Or do you look at each key before you press it :)?
OK, you got me on that one. :-)
My co-workers hate touching my computer, because I have my keyboard set
to Dvorak, but the actual keyboard keys-caps are still in QWERTY. They
say I have the best password protection
Graeme Geldenhuys schrieb:
> Florian Klaempfl wrote:
>> Not me ;) E.g. I really hate systems which have switched Ok/Cancel buttons.
>
> Ah, so you are one of "those" users... that don't read the screen and
> only rely on muscle memory. :-)
Yes, because it's quicker. Or do you look at each key bef
2009/11/13 Graeme Geldenhuys :
> Florian Klaempfl wrote:
>>
>> Not me ;) E.g. I really hate systems which have switched Ok/Cancel buttons.
>
> Ah, so you are one of "those" users... that don't read the screen and
> only rely on muscle memory. :-)
Reflex is orders of a magnitude quicker than readin
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
So in such a case, the average user has no problem in using our fpGUI
based applications.
ok, in my original post I did not mean to impugn fpGUI or anything like
this (I haven't event tested it yet). And even lazarus allows you to
modify, colors, sizes and fonts to t
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
>
> Not me ;) E.g. I really hate systems which have switched Ok/Cancel buttons.
Ah, so you are one of "those" users... that don't read the screen and
only rely on muscle memory. :-)
Hopefully once I have completed to port of MiG layout, that issue would
be a thing of the
Graeme Geldenhuys schrieb:
> Martin wrote:
>> 2) is what Java and fpgui (and afaik msegui) aim for. It is easier
>> for the developper. But the enduser will find an application that is
>> different to any other app he runs on his PC (and therefore harder
>> to use)
>
> I guess we will have to agr
Brian Prentice schrieb:
> My point about showing the differences in the dialogs, one acceptable
> and one clearly not acceptable, is that the solution seems to require
> the construction of two dialogs one for OS X and one for WindowsXP.
> Perhaps I'm wrong here but if I'm right this violates the
David Emerson wrote:
> * almost any antivirus / antispyware program
:-) Now that's a good example of awful UI design! I wonder if they
actually employee UI designers to purposefully screw the living crap out
of their products UI to make cleaning your Windows PC from viruses any
harder.
> The b
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> Some quick examples were applications don't follow the "look & feel"
> rules of the platform, yet users have no problems in using them.
>
> * Windows Media Player.
> * latest Microsoft Office with it's new menu+toolbar design
> * Pixel image editor. It fakes native look.
52 matches
Mail list logo