Thanks leledumbo and Ondrej, I am away now and will look these over in
the next days.
On 17/06/2015 18:35, Ondrej Kelle wrote:
Hi,
In case anybody finds it interesting, I've recently blogged:
FPC and Lazarus development environment
Notes on how to set up a FreePascal/Lazarus development
just compiling for a device is not a good reason to make app with it.
then maybe big, core functionality, non-UI code sharing between mobile,
desktop and web platforms would be a good one. no LCL, but at least RAD
style development with lazandroidmodulewizard is fun enough.
--
View this
On 17/06/15 11:03, aradeonas wrote:
Yes but its wrong
Wrong is typo here but its likely to be true.In Android and iOS I
didn't saw ant foreign language do a good job.If you saw any good app
with beautiful standard UI tell me.
I mean if they are going with AsndroidStudio probably they
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys
mailingli...@geldenhuys.co.uk wrote:
See screenshot...
http://geldenhuys.co.uk/~graemeg/laz_osx_corrupt_text_rendering.png
Could you please copy-paste (cmd+c , cmd+v) the contents to a text file?
thanks,
Dmitry
--
Can Lazarus do Android platform apps?
Yes but its wrong and I didn't saw any good new-age-look app with it.
Regards, Ara
--
http://www.fastmail.com - A fast, anti-spam email service.
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
On 06/16/2015 06:14 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Being open source and allowing me to customise things the way I like
is a brilliant feature.
He also wants to use closed source 3rd party stuff and want to impose
copy protection to his projects. All that is rather queer with an open
source IDE.
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys
mailingli...@geldenhuys.co.uk wrote:
How is that going to look under OSX where tabs are very different (read
as butt ugly and rubbish) compared to other platforms?
Good question. Has somebody tried CodeTyphon or KZDesktop in a Mac?
Those
On 2015-06-17 07:26, Sven Barth wrote:
Of course you can already check back with SafeNet if they'd provide you
with binaries or even better the source.
[I know it is a bit late for the original posted]
For that reason I refuse to purchase any software components that don't
include full source
Am 17.06.2015 00:22 schrieb Bo Berglund bo.bergl...@gmail.com:
If you could consider alternatives, then you could take a look at the
FPC port of Turbo Power's OnGuard. I've been using this for years in a
commercial environment creating trial versions, leased software etc. My
port is available
On Tue, 16 Jun 2015, aradeonas wrote:
Can Lazarus do Android platform apps?
Yes but its wrong and I didn't saw any good new-age-look app with it.
Why ?
If you use the JVM compiler, the app uses the Java SDK, and it will look exactly like the
android native apps look, because then it
On 2015-06-17 09:34, Michael Schnell wrote:
All that is rather queer with an open
source IDE.
Closed source 3rd part stuff might be problematic.
As for imposing copy protection on software... I have no problem with
that at all. I do it myself, otherwise how am I going to make money off
Yes but its wrong
Wrong is typo here but its likely to be true.In Android and iOS I didn't
saw ant foreign language do a good job.If you saw any good app with
beautiful standard UI tell me.
I mean if they are going with AsndroidStudio probably they should
continue with that,just compiling for a
Michael Schnell wrote:
He also wants to use closed source 3rd party stuff and want to impose
copy protection to his projects. All that is rather queer with an open
source IDE.
Why? It's not as though he's trying to add non-open components to the
published IDE and expecting other people to
Android and AndroidStudio are bad against Lazarus? Yea I think but it
has power of millions of users and it has a standard for UI and its good
so if any programming language want to play it its field it need to be
clean as native but easier to write with a better structure.
Regards,
Ara
--
Hello,
I work with Lazarus 1.4.0 on Kubuntu 14.04 with an x86_64 system.
I wanted today to make my Lazarus cross compile to win32, win64 and
linux 32 bit.
I followed the directions at these two pages:
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Cross_compiling#From_Linux_x64_to_Linux_i386
2015.06.17. 14:46 keltezéssel, JuuS írta:
Hello,
I work with Lazarus 1.4.0 on Kubuntu 14.04 with an x86_64 system.
I wanted today to make my Lazarus cross compile to win32, win64 and
linux 32 bit.
I followed the directions at these two pages:
On 06/17/2015 03:10 PM, Gabor Boros wrote:
2015.06.17. 14:46 keltezéssel, JuuS írta:
Hello,
I work with Lazarus 1.4.0 on Kubuntu 14.04 with an x86_64 system.
I wanted today to make my Lazarus cross compile to win32, win64 and
linux 32 bit.
I followed the directions at these two pages:
On 17/06/15 14:16, aradeonas wrote:
Android and AndroidStudio are bad against Lazarus?
Well I can see the difference and to me Lazarus is the winner here and now.
Yea I think but it
has power of millions of users
maybe, like some not exactly fresh meat has too ;)
and it has a standard
Hi,
In case anybody finds it interesting, I've recently blogged:
FPC and Lazarus development environment
Notes on how to set up a FreePascal/Lazarus development environment on a
Linux system, with cross-compiling for OSX and Windows
As for the make all for Linux i386 it fails with:
You need 32-bit libraries, too. Usually packaged with multilib in its
name. After that, you need to add -Fl pointing to those 32-bit libraries as
the default library search path must be for your 64-bit system. You might
even need -Xd if the
20 matches
Mail list logo
