On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 12:20:59PM +0100, Michael Schnell wrote:
E) drop the graphics and do a TCL-TK alike TUI program that can be
accessed via Telnet or SSH.
Again Lazarus does not have a Widget Type for this. Using the IDE
provided by FPC might help.
Why use an ugly TCL TUI, if the
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 04:51:15PM +0700, Paul Ishenin wrote:
Barry Kelly (on stackoverflow) also said that Delphi 64-bit probably won't
have an internal assembler (iow asm only via external tasm and .obj linking)
Here you can read more:
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 08:32:03PM +0200, ik wrote:
Thanks all,
For now it appears that the project will not take place, but it is
interesting regardless of that.
Something for the archive then;
I forgot to say that the project I researched this for was finally done
using these components:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 02:07:36PM +0200, ik wrote:
If I have raw alaw or ulaw (or other codec) of audio I get in a socket. How
can i play that data in Windows ?
Please note that I haven't developed for Windows for over 7 years now, so a
good tutorial or Pascal code will be very good help in
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 11:01:19PM +0200, Thierry B. wrote:
Where is the Indy 9 for freepascal/lazarus ?
There isn't one. Indy 9 never supported FPC.
This is wrong. There is a port that did support Windows. I never bothered
with Linux (because the libc using Kylix port was on the way out
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 09:05:48AM +0200, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
I hope FPC does not have this bug?
Yes it does.
For Delphi compatibility I guess?
Not that I know. One can argue if it really is a bug. See my other mail. For
most purposes where one would use object, records with
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 09:14:41AM +0200, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
I think they didn't pick the object type because it also supports VMTs, a
feature that complicates resolving methods, and considerably complicating
those features. TP Tobject can magically gain a VMT when a virtual method
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 09:38:26AM +0200, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Op 2010-10-25 09:25, Michael Van Canneyt het geskryf:
Too much work, because it requires me to know in which branches the
features are.
That only occurs if they don't name the branch appropriately. For example,
a
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 09:20:39AM +0100, Lukasz Sokol wrote:
[...]
good idea, but what actually stops us from adopting the Linux model ?
About 6 dedicated paid people (and a whole bunch more volunteers) to manage
all the branches and review and administrate each patch to reitegrate all
the
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 08:25:28AM +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
versioning. But it can regurgitate information it gets passed _by_
Lazarus.
Defines and {$I %environmentvariable%} are examples of this.
The point I was trying to make- which I didn't do very well- was that if
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 10:35:12AM +0200, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Op 2010-10-25 10:22, Marco van de Voort het geskryf:
Such schemes only work in retrospect. With 20 people all having a couple of
pet projects you are quickly talking hundreds of branches.
So what's the problem
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 10:47:05AM +0200, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Op 2010-10-25 10:35, Vincent Snijders het geskryf:
No, there is a limit on the number of branches you - sorry, I mean *I*
- can overview. For me, two long living branches are already too much.
Distribute the work-load.
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 09:42:47AM +0100, Lukasz Sokol wrote:
being able to put in a lot of time into the project on a regular, guaranteed
basis, which is hard if they are not at least partially fulltime.
I know the FULL Linux workflow won't fit - but what if it was scaled to our
needs
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 11:19:27AM +0200, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Op 2010-10-25 10:52, Marco van de Voort het geskryf:
The problem is keeping track of them. See my other reply in this thread.
Again, use the right tools for the job. Git (I really didn't what to say
this again) makes
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 08:10:18PM +1100, Alexander Klenin wrote:
What I haven't seen:
- the problem
Lazarus project is unable to do releases in a timely manner.
Major or minor?
- the solution
Make a releases time-based, as suggested at the start of the thread.
This has been
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 11:28:20AM +0100, Lukasz Sokol wrote:
The whole point of the others is that the current setup already strains
resources, specially during release preparation times.
I.e you needed a volunteer to step up and propose himself to do this,
and somebody did. (i.e. Juha,
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 10:19:42PM +1100, Alexander Klenin wrote:
The problems are always that people only start moving when release building
is already upon them. And then these people have no time, and then those.
This indicates a problem with the release process.
No doubt. But I doubt
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 09:55:29AM +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
In project1.lpr add
uses FileUtil;
ProjectName := ExtractFilenameOnly({$I %file%});
which looks like it will handle the project name issue perfectly.
In this case, yes.
--
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 02:10:17PM +0100, Paulo Costa wrote:
Then 0.9.28.2 has to be release very shortly after that. Not very
good, and clearly shows that we need more people responsible for doing
testing of the basic functionality at least before releases.
That kind of reasoning leads
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 01:38:42PM +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Is it possible to get the original name of a project by doing something like
scratch:= {$I %PROJFILE% };
Free Pascal doesn't know about projects, but can inline custom environment
variables that way, if Lazarus would set them
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 03:44:47PM +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Is it possible to get the original name of a project by doing something
like
scratch:= {$I %PROJFILE% };
Free Pascal doesn't know about projects, but can inline custom environment
variables that way, if Lazarus
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 10:49:11PM +0200, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
There are some new options to create
* sets of compiler options - called Build modes,
* project and package macros - called Build macros
* and rules to set macros, paths and options automatically depending on
target platform -
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 01:14:29PM +0200, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
application that uses records with methods.
Side Note:
I still don't get why Borland/Embarcadero did that... records with methods.
MvC hinted that it is because .Net has records with methods. But delphi
Objects do exactly
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 01:10:58PM +1100, Alexander Klenin wrote:
The initialization and finalization, required for managed types
(AnsiString...), is broken in derived Objects, since the introduction of
these types. Because it were easy to fix that bug (like with nested
records), it seems
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 10:41:15AM +0200, Michael Schnell wrote:
Thread support _might_ be a candidate, as threadvar access could be
improved (but maybe it could be improved even without dropping the
threadlib binding). OTOH threadlib automatically provides FUTEX access
for archs that
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 07:59:48AM -0500, Andrew Brunner wrote:
?if Accept then
?begin
|
1 2 ? ?3 ? ?4 ? 5
Actually, I rarely break my If statements across more than one line
save to accommodate large logic statements for code readability.
if (condition1=condition2) or
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 10:34:27AM +0200, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Using the snapshot listed above, I get the following error, when
I try and rebuild the IDE (with my new package selection). Compiling
seems fine, it's just the linking that keeps failing. I have also
setup this snapshot to
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 03:07:55PM +0200, Bernd Kreuss wrote:
On 13.10.2010 11:33, Marco van de Voort wrote:
Make sure you test it well anyways. (add one or two local hotfixes if you
have to). 2.4.2 must really last a while.
Why does it have to last a while? Does it cost money to apply
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 01:35:30PM +0200, Torsten Bonde Christiansen wrote:
ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/beta/2.4.2-rc1/
and
ftp://freepascal.stack.nl/pub/fpc/beta/2.4.2-rc1/
Is this the same available via svn here:
http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/fpc/tags/release_2_4_2_rc1
The
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 09:54:47AM +0200, Sven Barth wrote:
I haven't yet tested it, but what about the problem mentioned here
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=16121 , which renders generics
completly unusable in 2.4.2 and 2.4.3 (last time I tested)? I've also
added a comment which
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 11:46:16AM +0200, Sven Barth wrote:
Make sure you test it well anyways. (add one or two local hotfixes if you
have to). 2.4.2 must really last a while.
This time, I will :)
How long do we have time for RC1?
Depends on what comes up and how much patching there
Hello,
We have placed the first release-candidate of the Free Pascal Compiler
version 2.4.2 on our ftp-servers.
You can help improve the upcoming 2.4.2 release by downloading and
testing this release. If you want you can report what you have done here:
http://wiki.freepascal.org/Testers_2.4.2
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 02:41:17PM +0200, Frank Church wrote:
Is the a subversion command to list changes to a file or directory you are
interested in?
Play with
svn status / svn diff
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 05:24:55AM +0200, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
Question is, what the users expect from a syntax highlighter.
(can't resist: Usually they expect the impossible :-)
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 12:22:20AM +0100, Frank Church wrote:
This may be because since creating the article I have made changes
directly online to the web page to make it easier to understand, rather
than running the new changes and copying it back to the article.
No, it is because you
On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 02:30:11PM +0100, Frank Church wrote:
On 3 October 2010 13:23, Joshua Lim joshua__...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi Frank, do you have something for Win32? Thanks.
I don't have anything for Win32 yet, but it should be easy to convert. You
only have to look out for the
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 02:44:19PM +0300, Juha Manninen (gmail) wrote:
P.S.
Scripting language term is used loosely for dynamic languages like Perl,
Python and Ruby,
Dynamic typic and scripting are not related. Scripting usually points
towards a more interpretive way of execution. You can
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:11:48AM +0200, Guy Fink wrote:
the conversions into tables, so they can be linked in, already.
With the tool you mean the charset-unit?
No, I mean fpc/rtl/units/creumap.pp that afaik generates statically linkable
units from ISO files that plugin to charset.
What
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 02:33:43PM +0100, Frank Church wrote:
Will Lazarus work well on a 512Mb VM with a provider like Linode or
Slicehost?
Has anyone tried it?
You had some answers, I can only give one other tip: if low on memory,
disable smartlinking as much as possible. Then you should
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 06:33:19PM -0500, Andrew Brunner wrote:
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Marco van de Voort mar...@stack.nl wrote:
Well, one pain less. Delphi deprecated suspending/resuming of threads.
That makes for interesting news. What about suspending / resuming
Manager
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:48:09AM +0200, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
I was amazed that there isn't a single use of threads in Lazarus code base.
Threads however are the thing of the future because computers have more and
more CPU cores. Threads are a way to utilize them.
Threads are a
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 07:12:24AM +0100, J?rgen Hestermann wrote:
And I think shortstring should generally be discouraged. The standard is
always 255 is enough, but sooner or later somebody hits it:
That's like saying that short integer types like byte or word should be
discouraged and
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 08:04:42AM +0200, Maik Wojcieszak wrote:
I've tried some regex units implemented in pascal but they are
either not complete or buggy or slow.
The best I've found was PCRE which is kind of a standard in many
scripting languages.
I'm not sure if there is a lazarus
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 02:53:32PM +0100, Lukasz Sokol wrote:
Hi Group,
How should the TStringList behave when
Delimiter := ' ';
QuoteChar := '';
?
On my
Lazarus 0.9.28.2 r22279 FPC 2.2.4 i386-win32-win32/win64
when reading a line like this
Sep 3 16:27:32 router_ip
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 04:53:30PM +0100, Lukasz Sokol wrote:
But plain TStrings (hence TStringList too) already has the
Names[index], Value['Name'], ValueOfIndex[Index] properties;
And IIRC Delphi supports 'Name with spaces=Value with spaces,Other
Name=Other Value'
format on plain
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 05:55:13PM +0200, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Download size:
--
DocView plus it's help file:
Linux 32-bit= 533KB
Linux 64-bit= 446KB
Windows 32-bit = 367KB
Class Documentation:
fpGUI [fpgui-20100826.zip]= 0.1MB
RTL + FCL
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 04:02:44PM +0200, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
But e.g. the fact that in the html output, see also has an description
and has links on top, goes for every lemma.
You cannot compare IPF format to HTML. You should compare it to RTF or PDF
or something similar.
Why? See
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 09:28:14AM +0200, Maik Wojcieszak wrote:
Is something exported, but not explicitely declared __cdecl really cdecl?
I am using cdecl in Delphi and it works very well. So, I guess it is ok.
I've tested stdcall and it show's the same problem.
Then I don't know. The
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 01:41:51PM +0200, Maik Wojcieszak wrote:
After my holiday I've done done more research on this problem and hope I
can get an answer while continuing this thread.
My Versions (again)
Lazarus IDE v0.9.28.2 Beta
MS Windows XP Prof DE sp3
FPC Version 2.2.4
What I
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 10:34:15PM +0100, Howard Page-Clark wrote:
http://www.stack.nl/~marcov/doc-chm.zip
and contains rtl,fcl,lcl ,fpdoc,ref,user,prog.chm
Thanks for this. The archive contains .xct, but no .kwd files.
Is this an oversight?
Yes, will fix that tonight.
--
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 09:26:10AM -0400, Andrew Haines wrote:
Hi, there seems to be something wrong with the binary index. See the
attached screenshots. For instance the first items of fcl.chm should be:
Strange. Nothing changed there in months afaik. Will look into it.
--
Hello,
I've generated a new help snapshot. (chm files)
The archive still is at
http://www.stack.nl/~marcov/doc-chm.zip
and contains rtl,fcl,lcl ,fpdoc,ref,user,prog.chm
This release benefits from several improvements in the fpdoc generation,
specially links between packages, and links in
Hello,
Graeme filed a bugreport (15774) about inheritance diagrams.
Mostly he wanted interfaces in the inheritance, but while preparing that I
found out that inheritance diagrams were broken already.
I fixed this, but there are several problems and conditions left, and this
message documents
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:08:47AM +0100, S?rgio Lopes wrote:
I just compiled FPC from trunk, and though it creates the various folders
with the name 2.5.1, the binary indicates it's 2.4.0. Is there anything I
need to change so that binaries get compiled and give the correct version
when
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 10:34:08AM -0400, Luis R. Hilario B. wrote:
I am experiencing a problem with the URLs and some characters. E.g.
file:///home/user1/help/file.html#help
It does not work, because the result is:
file:///home/user1/help/file.html%23help
Web browsers say File not
Hi,
I tried to add help for keywords by adding a database entry to
helpmanager.pas for the ref manual (which contains the language keywords).
This seems to work, but the keywords are not routed to the lhelp binary.
How does the helpmanager query lhelp what keywords are available? (ref.chm
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 10:32:43AM +0200, Sven Barth wrote:
Am 28.07.2010 09:59, schrieb Mattias Gaertner:
Maybe gksudo can help.
gksudo might be system specific. What about PolicyKit, which is from
FreeDesktop and thus tries to standardisize such tasks:
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 11:13:19AM -0300, Marcos Douglas wrote:
I didn't find a starting compiler for windows, but for linux, darwin
and freebsd you can get ppcxxx from
ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/dist/2.4.0/bootstrap/
As Win too! Look
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 08:01:10PM -0300, Julio C. Taborda wrote:
I didn't find a starting compiler for windows, but for linux, darwin
and freebsd you can get ppcxxx from
ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/dist/2.4.0/bootstrap/
I added win32.
--
___
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 03:53:09PM +0200, Kjow wrote:
Is it possible to cross compile for arm without having target libs?
Yes, for wince.
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 12:13:48PM +0200, Vincent Snijders wrote:
Actually I would need it for the Lazarus code itself, for converter
configuration.
VirtualTreeView is not very big but it adds some more kilobytes to Lazarus
code. I hope it is OK for other developers.
I don't mind the
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 10:06:55AM +0200, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
So we kick out synedit too ? :-)
License wise it is also not possible IIRC. (MPL)
Synedit is double licensed under GPL2.
I was wrong, VST is dual licensed to LGPL even (but not with FPC exception)
--
In our previous episode, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara said:
(I seem to have failed to receive Adem's msg, so I might reply to him
sometimes)
I don't think it is a valid issue, since VT is licensed under MPL and
GPL; MPL makes it even more liberally licensed than LGPL.
Not that i think this
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 02:38:13PM +0300, Juha Manninen wrote:
Delphi converter in Lazarus trunk now supports also replacement of function
calls. It is all configurable and user changes to the configuration are
persistent. The converter settings window has a button Function
Replacements
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 11:10:27AM +0200, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
Yes, ShellExecute can be mapped to OpenURL, OpenDocument or even a
program execution routine. In some cases it can be used even to print
o.O
In general it is mostly execute based on program extension, except when
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 12:24:31PM +0200, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
In general it is mostly execute based on program extension, except when
protocol (mailto:/,http:// etc) is prefixed.
Then it should be mapped to OpenDocument() and sometimes to OpenURL
And if it is not 100% clear,
On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 10:04:37AM +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
This is rapidly getting to the point where it ought to be in
lazarus-other, but
Well, let's do it there then. I'll reply there.
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
On Sun, Jul 04, 2010 at 01:01:49PM +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
programming on spec.
Moreover, even if you specify it as day-job, can you consider in-house stuff
commercial? It is not sold.
But very often the software facilitates services which are sold. We send
out hourly
On Sat, Jul 03, 2010 at 09:07:08PM +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Are these people users of Lazarus in their day jobs or is Lazarus just a
hobby that they don't ever expect to use professionally?
For some it is a hobby, some use it for commercial stuff.
I'd prefer to use the word
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 06:13:06PM +1000, Peter E Williams wrote:
I have been trying to follow this discussion but didn't know what part
to quote.
I was under the possibly mistaken impression that Delphi allowed the
user to link in C/C++ code to a Delphi project. I have never done this.
I
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 01:36:56AM +0300, Adem wrote:
I think these pie in the sky kind of scenarios are several years if
not longer beyond the initial C compiler. It will be a plant that needs
a lot of nurturing and care for a very long term, before it becomes an
alternative, and faces
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 12:17:47AM +0200, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
I've already translated a couple of available C libraries into Pascal,
using ToPas. There exist only a few constructs that do not translate
into Pascal directly (bitfields...), but their addition to the compiler
(code
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 08:48:00AM +0200, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
And, frankly, the project is called Free Pascal for a simple reason:
it is a *Pascal* compiler and a *Pascal* project.
I'm sorry. Can't agree with that.
I'm still dreaming of a FreeWirth (though admitted, M2 is so
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 09:18:06AM +0200, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 06/30/2010 10:23 PM, Adem wrote:
If you could compile, say, Modula (or C/C++) with FPC, you would have
direct access to a huge time-tested resource of libraries
In fact being able to tightly integrate C code (I can't
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 09:34:12AM +0200, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 07/01/2010 08:26 AM, Marco van de Voort wrote:
Since accessing header files is repeated as possible advantage files again
and again,
In fact I already missed sadly a fully working preprocessor (to be
activated optionally
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 10:21:30AM +0200, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 07/01/2010 10:00 AM, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Even if FPC supported such a mess, this won't solve the fundamental
problem with C headers: they work only properly if every used header is
compiled for each source file again
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 11:08:49AM +0200, Michael Schnell wrote:
Ask yourself why GCC doesn't have preprocessed headers,
I supposed you mean precompiled headers and not headers that are
passed through the preprocessor.
This is according to what I called the C philosophy in the other mail.
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 08:12:52PM +0300, Adem wrote:
You could have asked the fpc team or put it into one of the many free
repositories. If you put something into lazarus examples then lazarus
users expect a reason for downloading 650KB extra. If the above is the
only reason, then you
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 02:27:22PM +0200, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
Aren't you against a e.g. .Net backend because it requires a completely
different runtime :)? I think the same applies to M2 etc. as well?
IMO we could separate the language itself (syntax) from the RTL (semantics).
Hmm,
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 01:55:43PM +0200, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
the .Net thing mostly on the premise of 'write in the language you're
most comfortable yet share with others you/they find useful';
Exactly, sold. It's marketing speech. You could use any language but
only to a degree
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 06:56:26PM +0200, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
FPC overcomes this problem with the .ppu files (I assume)
No. That is an optimalization. The core feature is defining the unit
concept, and clearing (reinitializing from cmdline params) preprocessor
state
C++ with
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 11:59:15PM +0300, Adem wrote:
Why do you think Pascal would lose its glamor when (or if) FPC can
compile other languages?
... because it increases the maintainance work on fpc. Even with one front
end only we are almost unable to keep the issue count under
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 07:40:11PM +0200, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
-installs under Linux under /usr/local/lib, while the
packages install under /usr/lib
Depends on the distribution and package conventions of that package system.
--
___
Lazarus
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 03:37:13PM +0300, Adem wrote:
On 2010-06-20 14:41, Marco van de Voort wrote:
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 02:26:20PM +0300, Adem wrote:
Shouldn't the mascot be a member of Canidae family --coyote, volf,
jackal, fox or preferably a dog.
If you find one
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 09:36:25AM +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
FPC loads foreign libraries externally all the time. But you also don't
communicate on Pascal level between with them, and keep the RTL/libc states
totally apart.
I refer to this as the manual solution. (which is btw not
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 12:34:34PM +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
For example, Packages share the same memory space and class inheritance
tree.
Libraries do not.
Thanks both. So if I understand things correctly:
* A package uses the same LCL as the rest of the app.
Yes. Both code
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 10:20:46AM -0400, Doug Chamberlin wrote:
Please remove the animated leopard! IMHO, it is truly distracting and
juvenile.
That (Cheetah) is the FPC logo, and IMHO should stay no matter what.
But IMHO the animation could be done away with.
--
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:39:09PM +1100, Alexander Klenin wrote:
Please take a look and tell what you think about it.
A design nitpick: the toxic-blue rectangular buttons in the right-upper corner
are hurtful to an eye.
Agree. They don't seem to fit in with the theme.
They should,
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 12:17:14PM +0100, Frank Church wrote:
I keep getting this error message whenever I try to open a form.
What does it mean?
Form contains a (designtime) component that is not installed.
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 11:15:02AM +0200, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
I'm curious to know what was the reason behind the decision to use XML
for storing simple Lazarus settings, instead of the much simpler INI
format? This is a legit question and I'm very curious as to the
answer. Please note,
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:55:03AM +0100, Henry Vermaak wrote:
On 18 June 2010 10:15, Graeme Geldenhuys graemeg.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Now both examples contain the same information, but lets be honest..
Which one is easier to read (via human or program), manually tweak if
needed via
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 02:08:38PM +0200, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
The simple reason is that .ini is one level only, and XML has an infinite
nesting depth.
Technically yes, but also no. For example. 'regedit' in Microsoft
Windows can export the registry (a f***ken huge tree and garbled
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 02:15:30PM +0200, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 18/06/2010, Marco van de Voort mar...@stack.nl wrote:
The simple reason is that .ini is one level only, and XML has an infinite
nesting depth.
Could you give a small code example of how you read/write values
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 08:27:23PM +0300, ??ilvinas Ledas wrote:
* TOC can be designed in program.
* Index is created from TOC (as a result: not very useful yet).
* Saves and loads project from xml file.
Package chm's or an own?
Own. I save TOC tree and file names (paths)
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 12:05:12PM +0300, ??ilvinas Ledas wrote:
Some points:
* It takes specified dir with all the files in it and compiles them to
the chm archive (context ids and names can be assigned).
* TOC can be designed in program.
* Index is created from TOC (as a result: not very
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 02:21:39PM +0200, Michael Schnell wrote:
That only fixes the memorymanager issue, not the fact that there are two
copies of RTL/FCL/LCL state. (and VMTs for all duplicate classes etc).
OK.
Do you suggest that the LCL that seemingly automatically is created and
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 12:04:06PM +0200, Michael Schnell wrote:
OTOH, it might be possible to hook to the address space of another
process to share the heap and thus all instances of user defined
classes. Madshi's MadRemote seems to do something like this for
Delphi/Windows.
That only
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 11:25:12PM +0200, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 30 May 2010 22:47, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
We also should have local IDE help sources, for every lazarus version.
I hope to release the final fpGUI v0.7 in a few days. At the same time
I'll release pre-compiled INF
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:16:17AM +0200, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 10/06/2010, Marco van de Voort wrote:
It is not that help that is the problem, it is the context sensitive help
which is currently done by wiki.
But with DocView and INF help files, I have solved the context
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:34:27AM +0200, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
That help unfortunately sits in a very crappy format and in the wiki only.
Maybe one day we will have an export wiki
to XXX format, where XXX is something more usable, like the XML format
of fpdoc. Then just like fpdoc, we
601 - 700 of 880 matches
Mail list logo
