Vincent,
Does this proposed new release run all the included examples on all the
supported operating systems correctly?
I am particularly interested in the Mac OS X i386 version.
Brian Prentice
On Feb 22, 2011, at 4:51 AM, Vincent Snijders wrote:
Hi,
The last call for testing
operating
system that is supported.
The project is further badly hindered by the stubborn refusal of the designers
to implement Layout Managers.
Brian Prentice
On Sun 19/12/10 06:40 , Vincent Snijders vincent.snijd...@gmail.com sent:
2010/12/18 Graeme Geldenhuys graemeg.li...@gmail.com
My point about showing the differences in the dialogs, one acceptable
and one clearly not acceptable, is that the solution seems to require
the construction of two dialogs one for OS X and one for WindowsXP.
Perhaps I'm wrong here but if I'm right this violates the Lazarus and
FPC goal of
://sourceforge.net/projects/lazarus/files/
Brian Prentice
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Here is the result of opening the first example address_book
http://linuxenvy.com/bprentice/Lazarus/Snapshot%202009-11-11%2006-18-48.jpg
Brian
On Nov 11, 2009, at 6:09 AM, Vincent Snijders wrote:
Brian Prentice schreef:
I have recently installed fpc 2.2.4 and lazarus 0.9.28.2 on my
intel
Thank you for your replies on this matter. No one addressed the
underlying problem here. I believe that all the examples should be
run prior to a major release and those that do not run should be
removed. This should be a significant part of regression testing.
This was clearly not
that there are many more examples.
Brian
2009/11/11 Brian Prentice bprent...@webenet.net:
Is this statement 'Lazarus and Free Pascal aim to be write once,
compile
anywhere' still a goal? If so can someone please provide me with
the source
code of a non trivial program which runs on Windows
