On 12/06/2010 01:03 PM, Richard Saunders wrote:
trim your quotes!
+1
-Michael
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
On 12/6/2010 7:03 AM, Richard Saunders wrote:
On 12/6/2010 3:14 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
...please stop quoting such a lot of the previous messages...
I'd like to add my voice to this request. *Everyone* please trim your quotes!
And for Pete's sake, sweep the floor when you're done!
Hi,
No I'm not the list moderator (he/she seems asleep). Can Dariusz, Michael,
Marcos etc please stop quoting such a lot of the previous messages. We can
all read the previous message if needed. Currently your new posts contain
90% quotes and 3-5 lines of new text.
This is very annoying to read
On 12/6/2010 3:14 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
...please stop quoting such a lot of the previous messages...
I'd like to add my voice to this request. *Everyone* please trim your
quotes!
--
Rich S.
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 02:43:41PM +0100, Michael Schnell wrote:
OTOH, If doing Windows, Microsoft of course wants you to use IIS.
Microsoft IIS provides the ISAPI interface between the webserver and the
cgi program, that in this case is neither a program nor a service, but a
DLL. ISAPI
On 12/03/2010 01:32 AM, waldo kitty wrote:
using apache as an example, if the maximum number of servers (threads)
is reached, then requests are queued for X amount of time in the hopes
that a server comes free to handle the request... if a server does not
come free within X amount of time,
On 12/03/2010 01:56 PM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
What he said pertains to the inner workings of Apache
So when doing a multithreaded FCGI Server that uses a thread pool, the
managing what thread is to be used when (creating additional threads or
manage a queue if more requests com in
2010/12/2 Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org:
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010, Marcos Douglas wrote:
2010/12/2 Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org:
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 1:12 PM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010, Dariusz
On Fri, 3 Dec 2010, Marcos Douglas wrote:
There is just a global sessionlist accessed for many threads, at the same
time?
The fpWeb framework manages thread conflicts?
No, it does not. The sessionlist is not in fpWeb (although I have planned
that), only in some private code (the list is
On 12/1/2010 12:44 PM, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Joost van der Sluisjo...@cnoc.nl wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 17:05 +0100, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 15:51 +0100,
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Lee Jenkins l...@datatrakpos.com wrote:
On 12/1/2010 12:44 PM, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Joost van der Sluisjo...@cnoc.nl wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 17:05 +0100, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Joost van
On 12/3/2010 07:56, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Fri, 3 Dec 2010, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 12/03/2010 01:32 AM, waldo kitty wrote:
using apache as an example, if the maximum number of servers (threads) is
reached, then requests are queued for X amount of time in the hopes that a
server comes
On Fri, 3 Dec 2010, waldo kitty wrote:
What he said pertains to the inner workings of Apache, and is independent
of how
a particular request is handled. It pertains to how Apache handles new
connections on its HTTP socket. No more, no less.
exactly... i offered how apache does it as an
On 12/3/2010 13:06, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Fri, 3 Dec 2010, waldo kitty wrote:
What he said pertains to the inner workings of Apache, and is independent of how
a particular request is handled. It pertains to how Apache handles new
connections on its HTTP socket. No more, no less.
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010, Dariusz Mazur wrote:
ExtPascal uses threads to handle multiple connections. I remember you
don't accept this way, right? BTW, what is there wrong if ExtPascal
uses threads?
I accept using threads, but not the way ExtPascal does it. Threads should
be
optional. In
On 12/01/2010 05:43 PM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
Under normal circumstances you would have a fixed (or limited) thread
pool, and each request is handled by a free thread in the pool.
Of course it does make sense to use pre-started threads.
How are requests queued if no threads
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 12/01/2010 05:43 PM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
Under normal circumstances you would have a fixed (or limited) thread pool,
and each request is handled by a free thread in the pool.
Of course it does make sense to use pre-started
W dniu 2010-12-02 09:25, michael.vancann...@wisa.be pisze:
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010, Dariusz Mazur wrote:
ExtPascal uses threads to handle multiple connections. I remember you
don't accept this way, right? BTW, what is there wrong if ExtPascal
uses threads?
I accept using threads, but not the
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010, Dariusz Mazur wrote:
W dniu 2010-12-02 09:25, michael.vancann...@wisa.be pisze:
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010, Dariusz Mazur wrote:
ExtPascal uses threads to handle multiple connections. I remember you
don't accept this way, right? BTW, what is there wrong if ExtPascal
uses
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 7:38 AM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
[snip]
I dont understand.
I parse single request in single thread (for each request new thread)
and what can I do (other) with sessions?
One scenario looks like this:
- Request comes in (on whatever thread).
- Determine
W dniu 2010-12-02 11:38, michael.vancann...@wisa.be pisze:
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010, Dariusz Mazur wrote:
W dniu 2010-12-02 09:25, michael.vancann...@wisa.be pisze:
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010, Dariusz Mazur wrote:
ExtPascal uses threads to handle multiple connections. I remember
you
don't accept
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 1:12 PM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010, Dariusz Mazur wrote:
W dniu 2010-12-02 11:38, michael.vancann...@wisa.be pisze:
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010, Dariusz Mazur wrote:
W dniu 2010-12-02 09:25,
2010/12/2 Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org:
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 1:12 PM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010, Dariusz Mazur wrote:
W dniu 2010-12-02 11:38, michael.vancann...@wisa.be pisze:
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010,
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010, Marcos Douglas wrote:
2010/12/2 Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org:
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 1:12 PM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010, Dariusz Mazur wrote:
W dniu 2010-12-02 11:38,
On 12/2/2010 03:34, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 12/01/2010 05:43 PM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
Under normal circumstances you would have a fixed (or limited) thread pool,
and each request is handled by a free thread in the pool.
Of course it does make sense to use pre-started threads.
On 12/01/2010 12:58 AM, waldo kitty wrote:
No chance, I'd rather stop programming then using .net
+1000~
Why exactly would you prefer Java over CIL Pascal ?
(This of course should rather be handled in the other list...)
-Michael
--
On 12/1/2010 04:43, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 12/01/2010 12:58 AM, waldo kitty wrote:
No chance, I'd rather stop programming then using .net
+1000~
Why exactly would you prefer Java over CIL Pascal ?
i'm not saying that... i'm saying that if i had to code in .net, that i
On 11/30/2010 02:52 PM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
FastCgiExternalServer D:/counte/verbruik/server -host 127.0.0.1:2015
-idle-timeout 30 -flush
AFAIK, fastCGI can use as well a TCP/IP socket as a pipe to do the
communication between the WebServer and the CGI program (not really a
On 12/01/2010 11:25 AM, waldo kitty wrote:
i'm not saying that... i'm saying that if i had to code in .net, that
i would quite coding... is that not what the first quote says?
There are things that can't be done by most traditional programming
frameworks but can be done by using either Java
2010/12/1 Michael Schnell mschn...@lumino.de:
a Browser, ...). As we are in a Pascal oriented list, here, only CIL-Pascal
is relevant.
Actually this is a Lazarus list, so until FPC support CIL-pascal,
CIL-pascal is irrelevant here.
Vincent
--
___
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 11/30/2010 02:52 PM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
FastCgiExternalServer D:/counte/verbruik/server -host 127.0.0.1:2015
-idle-timeout 30 -flush
AFAIK, fastCGI can use as well a TCP/IP socket as a pipe to do the
communication between the
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 14:52 +0100, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:23 AM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Michael Van Canneyt
On 12/01/2010 02:16 PM, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
My FastCGI process is running as a windows service.
What is exactly the reason for this? Isn't it much easier when the
webserver starts (and stops, when it is not used) the cgi-application,
than doing this in a Windows service?
As creating
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 14:43 +0100, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 12/01/2010 02:16 PM, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
My FastCGI process is running as a windows service.
What is exactly the reason for this? Isn't it much easier when the
webserver starts (and stops, when it is not used) the
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
The can do the same thing:
By default, a fastcgi process is started by the webserver, passing it the
socket on which it should listen.
Most imporant difference is that mod_fastcgi is deprecated and doesn't
follow the FastCGI standard.
In
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 12/01/2010 02:16 PM, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
My FastCGI process is running as a windows service.
What is exactly the reason for this? Isn't it much easier when the
webserver starts (and stops, when it is not used) the cgi-application,
than
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 15:51 +0100, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
The can do the same thing:
By default, a fastcgi process is started by the webserver, passing it the
socket on which it should listen.
Most imporant difference is
On 12/01/2010 03:52 PM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
But FastCGI is better, since it runs irrespective of the webserver.
And given that IIS is losing market share, I would never code exclusively
for IIS.
+1, but we did hear bad rumors about FCGI, so we used ISAPI :(.
-Michael
--
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 15:51 +0100, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
The can do the same thing:
By default, a fastcgi process is started by the webserver, passing it the
socket on which it
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 1:05 PM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
[snip]
It never could. There is 1 connection, and all requests go through this
connection.
A week (or maybe 2) ago, I sent you a private mail about using select()
on the connection handle. This or the use of threads could
Joost van der Sluis escreveu:
The FastCGI process should return how many connection and requests it
can handle. I'm not sure anymore if FastCGI of fpc can handle muliple
requests at a time. (It could, but some parts ahve been changed)
AFAIK at least Apache does not support multiplexing, so no
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 1:05 PM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
[snip]
It never could. There is 1 connection, and all requests go through this
connection.
A week (or maybe 2) ago, I sent you a private mail about using select()
on the connection
2010/12/1 michael.vancann...@wisa.be:
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 1:05 PM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
[snip]
It never could. There is 1 connection, and all requests go through this
connection.
A week (or maybe 2) ago, I sent you a private
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 17:05 +0100, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 15:51 +0100, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
Also check this:
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Joost van der Sluis jo...@cnoc.nl wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 17:05 +0100, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 15:51 +0100, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Joost van
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 17:05 +0100, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 15:51 +0100, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
Also
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Marcos Douglas wrote:
2010/12/1 michael.vancann...@wisa.be:
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 1:05 PM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
[snip]
It never could. There is 1 connection, and all requests go through this
connection.
A
ExtPascal uses threads to handle multiple connections. I remember you
don't accept this way, right? BTW, what is there wrong if ExtPascal
uses threads?
I accept using threads, but not the way ExtPascal does it. Threads
should be
optional. In extpascal, the thread is equal to the session: if
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Michael Van Canneyt
mich...@freepascal.org wrote:
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Michael Van Canneyt
mich...@freepascal.org wrote:
Currently we're deploying a webapp that uses fpweb, FastCGI and runs as a
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Michael Van Canneyt
mich...@freepascal.org wrote:
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Michael Van Canneyt
mich...@freepascal.org wrote:
Currently we're deploying a webapp
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:23 AM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Michael Van Canneyt
mich...@freepascal.org wrote:
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Michael Van
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:23 AM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Michael Van Canneyt
mich...@freepascal.org wrote:
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:52 AM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:23 AM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Michael Van Canneyt
On 11/30/2010 01:29 PM, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
I'd rather stop programming then using .net
:) I'd rather use a Delphi-CIL compiler than Java :)
Anyway, porting would be as much work as rewriting the application.
I suppose not really, but maybe nearly :)
Just porting from
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Marcos Douglas m...@delfire.net wrote:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:52 AM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:23 AM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, Marcos Douglas
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, Marcos Douglas wrote:
This is very convenient, because you can start the fastcgi process in the
debugger, just as any normal process. Or, the fastCGI process can be a
windows service.
Very interesting. I didn't know about it.
Other than that, the configuration option
On 11/25/2010 09:19 PM, ABorka wrote:
. I always found the needed ExtJS extensions online, never needed to
develop them myself (A custom GridView for example, a double click
sorting functionality on the GridView header fields, etc.).
This suggests that doing a n ExtJS Widget Type interface for
On 11/24/2010 07:00 PM, ABorka wrote:
According to the linked ExtJS licensing FAQ, you have obligations to
publish the ExtJS JavaScript code that YOU have modified AND(!) you
are distributing it.
This seems to mean that just distributing the unmodified ExtJS code is
no problem whatsoever.
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 10:41, Michael Schnell mschn...@lumino.de wrote:
On 11/24/2010 07:00 PM, ABorka wrote:
According to the linked ExtJS licensing FAQ, you have obligations to
publish the ExtJS JavaScript code that YOU have modified AND(!) you are
distributing it.
This seems to mean
On 11/25/2010 10:29 AM, ik wrote:
http://www.sencha.com/products/license.php
I don't see how the Open source (GPL) license should affect the Pascal
code of an application that uses ExtJS (the pascal code same is
obviously not based on / derivative work of the GPLed Java script
code.) and
On 11/25/2010 02:21, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 11/25/2010 10:29 AM, ik wrote:
http://www.sencha.com/products/license.php
I don't see how the Open source (GPL) license should affect the Pascal
code of an application that uses ExtJS (the pascal code same is
obviously not based on / derivative
On 11/25/2010 02:21, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 11/25/2010 10:29 AM, ik wrote:
http://www.sencha.com/products/license.php
I don't see how the Open source (GPL) license should affect the Pascal
code of an application that uses ExtJS (the pascal code same is
obviously not based on /
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, ik wrote:
Hello List,
Well I know about the framework fur Javascript library in Lazarus, but I'm
thinking in the past year or so, what will it take to design a gui
application using Lazarus, and make it work like a web app that act the same
as the desktop version,
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 11:21, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, ik wrote:
Hello List,
Well I know about the framework fur Javascript library in Lazarus, but I'm
thinking in the past year or so, what will it take to design a gui
application using Lazarus, and make
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, ik wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 11:21, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, ik wrote:
Hello List,
Well I know about the framework fur Javascript library in Lazarus, but I'm
thinking in the past year or so, what will it take to design a gui
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 10:31 AM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
Unless they plan on translating the whole of GTK3 to Javascript, I don't see
how you can do that ? How to create a hover effect, tooltips, whatnot,
whenever the mouse moves ? What to do when a user clicks a button ?
All
On 11/24/2010 10:36 AM, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
I couldn't find any reasonable way to reuse my LCL animations code in
web applications.
Did you consider to use Delphi Prism (AFAIK the compiler is free) in a
Silverlight / Moonlight based web page ? This might allow for reusing
some
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 12:13, Michael Schnell mschn...@lumino.de wrote:
On 11/24/2010 10:36 AM, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
I couldn't find any reasonable way to reuse my LCL animations code in
web applications.
Did you consider to use Delphi Prism (AFAIK the compiler is free) in a
On 11/24/2010 08:32 AM, ik wrote:
Hello List,
Well I know about the framework fur Javascript library in Lazarus, but
I'm thinking in the past year or so, what will it take to design a gui
application using Lazarus, and make it work like a web app that act
the same as the desktop version,
2010/11/24 ik ido...@gmail.com:
SilverLight/Moonlight are the wrong way to do things (so does Flash). HTML5
provide in the DOM support for Canvas (you have some games for it), And IE9,
Webkit, Opera and Gecko support it, so it's like 99% of web browsers that
support for it.
But the HTML5
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 12:29, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
felipemonteiro.carva...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/11/24 ik ido...@gmail.com:
SilverLight/Moonlight are the wrong way to do things (so does Flash).
HTML5
provide in the DOM support for Canvas (you have some games for it), And
IE9,
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 11/24/2010 08:32 AM, ik wrote:
Hello List,
Well I know about the framework fur Javascript library in Lazarus, but I'm
thinking in the past year or so, what will it take to design a gui
application using Lazarus, and make it work like a web
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 12:26, Michael Schnell mschn...@lumino.de wrote:
On 11/24/2010 08:32 AM, ik wrote:
Hello List,
Well I know about the framework fur Javascript library in Lazarus, but I'm
thinking in the past year or so, what will it take to design a gui
application using Lazarus,
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, ik wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 12:26, Michael Schnell mschn...@lumino.de wrote:
On 11/24/2010 08:32 AM, ik wrote:
Hello List,
Well I know about the framework fur Javascript library in Lazarus, but I'm
thinking in the past year or so, what will it take to design a
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 12:46, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, ik wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 12:26, Michael Schnell mschn...@lumino.de
wrote:
On 11/24/2010 08:32 AM, ik wrote:
Hello List,
Well I know about the framework fur Javascript library in Lazarus,
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, ik wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 12:46, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
I did some research on that some months ago. I found that this supposedly
best would be done using ExtJS.
There are few problems with ExtJS. First it's not open source if you wish
to
use it in
On Wednesday 24 November 2010 12:11, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
MySQL I simply don't use because it is a bad database engine :-)
+1
zeljko
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 8:28 AM, zeljko zel...@holobit.net wrote:
On Wednesday 24 November 2010 12:11, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
MySQL I simply don't use because it is a bad database engine :-)
+1
+2
Marcos Douglas
--
___
Lazarus
On 11/24/2010 11:24 AM, ik wrote:
SilverLight/Moonlight are the wrong way to do things (so does Flash).
If you want to do client-programming in Pascal (or any other CIL enabled
language) Silverlight/Moonlight is just perfect, as it's this only way
to do this :).
-Michael
--
On 11/24/2010 11:36 AM, ik wrote:
making Pascal and Lazarus provide additional market to use
regarding Web Client programming, Silverlight/Moonlight does this fore
Pascal :) (any many other languages) but not for Lazarus :( .
-Michael
--
___
On 11/24/2010 11:26 AM, Michael Schnell wrote:
A decent way to do this would be creating an appropriate Widget Type
Interface (See How to tell lazarus the location of a used package in
this forum).
Sorry wrong link.
See Web Module not works on Linux in this forum
-Michael
--
On 11/24/2010 11:42 AM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
I tried making moderatly complicated production applications with it.
It cannot be done without redesigning ExtPascal from the ground up.
Same here, That is why I only recommended it as a way to try out ExtJS.
Comet is a rickety
2010/11/24 Michael Schnell mschn...@lumino.de:
_Of course_. It can't be repeated often enough :-[ ;-) Maybe some day it
helps
Maybe the day you send the patches?
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
On 11/24/2010 01:01 PM, Henry Vermaak wrote:
Maybe the day you send the patches?
Unfortunately after some initial experiments I'm not working actively on
this any more.
Of course I'll try to help whenever someone starts decent work on this
issue.
-Michael
--
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 11/24/2010 11:42 AM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
I tried making moderatly complicated production applications with it. It
cannot be done without redesigning ExtPascal from the ground up.
Same here, That is why I only recommended it as
To who is interested:
I tried to create a LinuxIFI Widget Type by stripping off the KDE
binding from the KDE2 Widget Type (when starting today I supposedly
would use FPGUI instead) and replace the Widget bindings by calls to
would-be transporter functions.
I even got at a presentable point:
On 11/24/2010 4:21 AM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, ik wrote:
Hello List,
Well I know about the framework fur Javascript library in Lazarus, but I'm
thinking in the past year or so, what will it take to design a gui
application using Lazarus, and make it work like
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, Lee Jenkins wrote:
On 11/24/2010 4:21 AM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, ik wrote:
Hello List,
Well I know about the framework fur Javascript library in Lazarus, but I'm
thinking in the past year or so, what will it take to design a gui
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Lee Jenkins l...@datatrakpos.com wrote:
I started a framework like that in question, actually had a decent working
prototype that used Adob Flex as the front end. The problem is as you
explained in that there is a tremendous amount of traffic for all of that
W dniu 2010-11-24 10:21, michael.vancann...@wisa.be pisze:
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, ik wrote:
Hello List,
Well I know about the framework fur Javascript library in Lazarus,
but I'm
thinking in the past year or so, what will it take to design a gui
application using Lazarus, and make it work
2010/11/24 ikido...@gmail.com:
SilverLight/Moonlight are the wrong way to do things (so does Flash). HTML5
provide in the DOM support for Canvas (you have some games for it), And IE9,
Webkit, Opera and Gecko support it, so it's like 99% of web browsers that
support for it.
But the HTML5
- michael vancanneyt michael.vancann...@wisa.be schreef:
Now if I build a web app for my clients and they have the source code, do I
require to buy a commercial license of ExtJS ?
Yes, because you make money on it, it is not open source.
Michael, that is a fallacy. It is not because
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, Dariusz Mazur wrote:
W dniu 2010-11-24 10:21, michael.vancann...@wisa.be pisze:
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, ik wrote:
Hello List,
Well I know about the framework fur Javascript library in Lazarus, but I'm
thinking in the past year or so, what will it take to design a gui
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, Dimitri Smits wrote:
- michael vancanneyt michael.vancann...@wisa.be schreef:
Now if I build a web app for my clients and they have the source code, do I
require to buy a commercial license of ExtJS ?
Yes, because you make money on it, it is not open source.
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, Dariusz Mazur wrote:
W dniu 2010-11-24 10:21, michael.vancann...@wisa.be pisze:
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, ik wrote:
Hello List,
Well I know about the framework fur Javascript library in Lazarus,
but I'm
thinking in the past year or so, what will it take to design a
On 11/24/2010 03:11, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, ik wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 12:46, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
I did some research on that some months ago. I found that this
supposedly
best would be done using ExtJS.
There are few problems with
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, Dariusz Mazur wrote:
That's not true. Transfer every action to server is very simple task, and
computing results also. Thus (on my web app) it took less than 10ms and
every user very rare generate more actions than 1 per second. Computing
and sending pdf reports took
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, Lee Jenkins wrote:
On 11/24/2010 8:57 AM, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Lee Jenkinsl...@datatrakpos.com wrote:
I started a framework like that in question, actually had a decent working
prototype that used Adob Flex as the front end. The
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Michael Van Canneyt
mich...@freepascal.org wrote:
Currently we're deploying a webapp that uses fpweb, FastCGI and runs as a
windows service app. Although the latter is more of a necessity than a
voluntary choice.
The fastcgi approach makes it easy to debug.
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Michael Van Canneyt
mich...@freepascal.org wrote:
Currently we're deploying a webapp that uses fpweb, FastCGI and runs as a
windows service app. Although the latter is more of a necessity than a
voluntary choice.
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
