Bo Berglund schrieb:
Each package/project should have its own directories. This ensures
that a package does not depend on a project, so it can work with many
projects.
Not if they evolve and we must maintain old code when we need to
return to an older time...
Then you'll have to check
On Fri, 26 Nov 2010 16:36:39 +0100, Mattias Gaertner
nc-gaert...@netcologne.de wrote:
On Fri, 26 Nov 2010 16:01:45 +0100
Bo Berglund bo.bergl...@gmail.com wrote:
In Delphi I solve this by not having global paths to the installed
components, instead I add the path to each component that is
On Fri, 26 Nov 2010 16:01:45 +0100
Bo Berglund bo.bergl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 21:05:48 -0500, waldo kitty
wkitt...@windstream.net wrote:
On 11/25/2010 06:09, Bo Berglund wrote:
Now, the description on how packages work in lazarus leads me to
believe that any given
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 12:09:16 +0100
Bo Berglund bo.bergl...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Each package/project should have its own directories. This ensures
that a package does not depend on a project, so it can work with many
projects.
Not if they evolve and we must maintain old code when we
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Bo Berglund bo.bergl...@gmail.com wrote:
This is exactly why I get worried about the packages being totally IDE
global no matter where they are stored.
Bo, you could notice the discussion about optimization recently, it was also
package-related and today I
On 25/11/2010 11:09, Bo Berglund wrote:
This is exactly why I get worried about the packages being totally IDE
global no matter where they are stored.
Maybe we should not use packages at all, that would at least solve
this problem.
Hi,
from outsiders' perspective : how about storing your
On 11/25/2010 06:09, Bo Berglund wrote:
Now, the description on how packages work in lazarus leads me to
believe that any given package can only exist in one single copy and
this location is not inside the project code space.
Each package/project should have its own directories. This ensures
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 23:57:11 +0100, Mattias Gaertner
nc-gaert...@netcologne.de wrote:
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 20:03:26 +0100
Bo Berglund bo.bergl...@gmail.com wrote:
Why is one Lazarus using a relative path and the other an absolute
path?
0.9.29 uses relative paths for packages in the Lazarus
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 09:30:01 +0100
Bo Berglund bo.bergl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 23:57:11 +0100, Mattias Gaertner
nc-gaert...@netcologne.de wrote:
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 20:03:26 +0100
Bo Berglund bo.bergl...@gmail.com wrote:
Why is one Lazarus using a relative path and the
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 11:06:15 +0100, Mattias Gaertner
nc-gaert...@netcologne.de wrote:
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 09:30:01 +0100
Bo Berglund bo.bergl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 23:57:11 +0100, Mattias Gaertner
nc-gaert...@netcologne.de wrote:
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 20:03:26 +0100
Bo
Zitat von Bo Berglund bo.bergl...@gmail.com:
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 11:06:15 +0100, Mattias Gaertner
nc-gaert...@netcologne.de wrote:
[...]
I am trying to get my head around this concept...
Currently we work in Delphi.
Say that we develop a number of different programs.
These programs have
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 18:39:05 +, Martin laza...@mfriebe.de wrote:
On 22/11/2010 18:24, Bo Berglund wrote:
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 23:38:42 +, Martinlaza...@mfriebe.de wrote:
On 21/11/2010 22:16, Bo Berglund wrote:
I have switched to using the SVN version of lazarus.
I put it in parallel
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 17:34:07 +0100, Sven Barth
pascaldra...@googlemail.com wrote:
Then I don't understand...
I have done nothing about the config (since i did not know it
existed), so my new SVN version of Lazarus (the fixes branch) should
read the same data as the normal lazarus, right?
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 19:54:23 +0100, Bo Berglund
bo.bergl...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyway, now I understand what is going on and the package is
recognized.
Well, I was a bit premature.
I now looked in the config dirs and located the packagefiles.xml files
and had a look inside.
This is what I found:
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 20:03:26 +0100
Bo Berglund bo.bergl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 19:54:23 +0100, Bo Berglund
bo.bergl...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyway, now I understand what is going on and the package is
recognized.
Well, I was a bit premature.
I now looked in the config
Am 22.11.2010 00:38, schrieb Martin:
On 21/11/2010 22:16, Bo Berglund wrote:
I have switched to using the SVN version of lazarus.
I put it in parallel to the binary distribution lazarus so now I have
two of them.
and that means you want for at least one of them use (command line
param, use
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 23:38:42 +, Martin laza...@mfriebe.de wrote:
On 21/11/2010 22:16, Bo Berglund wrote:
I have switched to using the SVN version of lazarus.
I put it in parallel to the binary distribution lazarus so now I have
two of them.
and that means you want for at least one of them
On 22/11/2010 18:24, Bo Berglund wrote:
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 23:38:42 +, Martinlaza...@mfriebe.de wrote:
On 21/11/2010 22:16, Bo Berglund wrote:
I have switched to using the SVN version of lazarus.
I put it in parallel to the binary distribution lazarus so now I have
two of them.
and
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 23:16:09 +0100
Bo Berglund bo.bergl...@gmail.com wrote:
I have switched to using the SVN version of lazarus.
I put it in parallel to the binary distribution lazarus so now I have
two of them. After I retrieved lazarus from SVN and also the latest
release of fpc I got
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 00:11:23 +0100, Mattias Gaertner
nc-gaert...@netcologne.de wrote:
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 23:16:09 +0100
Bo Berglund bo.bergl...@gmail.com wrote:
I *have* copied SdpoSerial from the original lazarus components dir
into the new lazarus components dir. So what more do I need to
20 matches
Mail list logo
