Re: [lazarus] 'Interfaces' unit

> Forms and Controls only 'use' the abstract LCL interface. > By using the 'interfaces', you add a real LCL interface. > The LCL interfaces use the LCL, not the other way round. > Some LCL objects must be initialized before others. So there must be one > root unit. For the LCL, this is the 'interfa

[lazarus] Windows XP Shadow Resource

  Why the Windows XP Shadow Resource doesn´t work on Lazarus?   Ez:   procedure TShadowedHintWindow.CreateParams(var Params: TCreateParams); const   CS_DROPSHADOW = $0002; begin   inherited;   { Enable drop shadow effect on Windows XP and later }   if (Win32Platform = VER_PLA

Re: [lazarus] Because I can't get SQLDB working

I too was able to get Zeos to compile. I'm using FPC 2.1.1 3/18/06 with Lazarus 0.9.13. The issues I found had only to do with paths. All the files were there. Due to my limited experience I just moved files and attempted to recompile until it found everything it wanted. I did not test the

[lazarus] TXMLPropertyStorage question

I have found some unexpected behaviour with the storing of form data.   I have two forms, the second form is shown from the first one (just a simple show). When I change the position for instance and close the second form the data is stored. It works like expected. However, when I close the

Re: [lazarus] Because I can't get SQLDB working

On Sun, 19 Mar 2006 17:46:09 -0600 "Matt Henley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just a note.. the group that I am working with managed to get zeoslib > working with lazarus... we are using firebird (2.0 beta) and I can > confirm that it works for a test database... there are some strange > things th

Re: [lazarus] Because I can't get SQLDB working

Just a note.. the group that I am working with managed to get zeoslib working with lazarus... we are using firebird (2.0 beta) and I can confirm that it works for a test database... there are some strange things that you have to do (lazarus cant find a source file thats in the paths in the compiler

Re: [lazarus] 'Interfaces' unit

On Sun, 19 Mar 2006 13:47:01 -0300 "Flávio Etrusco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/19/06, Mattias Gaertner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sun, 19 Mar 2006 06:08:31 -0300 > > "Flávio Etrusco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Is there some reason why the 'Interfaces' unit i

Re: [lazarus] datedit

On Sun, 19 Mar 2006, Vincent Snijders wrote: > Bogusław Brandys wrote: > > Micha Nelissen wrote: > > > > > On Sun, 19 Mar 2006 19:54:00 +0100 > > > Vincent Snijders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I am about to fix issue 1894. The dialog looks now like the image >

Re: [lazarus] datedit

Bogusław Brandys wrote: Micha Nelissen wrote: On Sun, 19 Mar 2006 19:54:00 +0100 Vincent Snijders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I am about to fix issue 1894. The dialog looks now like the image in the attachment. I have a hunch, that this isn't going to satisfy all users either, the capti

Re: [lazarus] datedit

On Sun, 19 Mar 2006, Bogusław Brandys wrote: > Micha Nelissen wrote: > > On Sun, 19 Mar 2006 19:54:00 +0100 > > Vincent Snijders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I am about to fix issue 1894. The dialog looks now like the image in > > > the attachment. I have a hunch, that

Re: [lazarus] datedit

Micha Nelissen wrote: On Sun, 19 Mar 2006 19:54:00 +0100 Vincent Snijders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I am about to fix issue 1894. The dialog looks now like the image in the attachment. I have a hunch, that this isn't going to satisfy all users either, the caption is only half visible.

Re: [lazarus] datedit

 Vincent Snijders wrote: Hi, I am about to fix issue 1894. The dialog looks now like the image in the attachment. I have a hunch, that this isn't going to satisfy all users either, the caption is only half visible. How can it be improved? Adding a bordersize of 6 to the calendar fix

Re: [lazarus] datedit

On Sun, 19 Mar 2006 19:54:00 +0100 Vincent Snijders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I am about to fix issue 1894. The dialog looks now like the image in the > attachment. I have a hunch, that this isn't going to satisfy all users > either, the caption is only half visible. > > How can it

[lazarus] datedit

Hi, I am about to fix issue 1894. The dialog looks now like the image in the attachment. I have a hunch, that this isn't going to satisfy all users either, the caption is only half visible. How can it be improved? Adding a bordersize of 6 to the calendar fixes this for the English caption, '

[lazarus] New Install on GNU/Linux

I just finished installing Lazarus on my Debian Sarge system and thought of giving some feedback. I hope this will be added to the installation documentation to ease the way for the new users. As there is no .deb package for Lazarus, I downloaded the Lazarus 0.9.12 Zipped

Re: [lazarus] [Bug] Double click on a TreeView cause access violation on win32

Sorry for the X post on mantis, i got an error message when validating ...Never thought it would have worked.Sorry again.On 3/19/06, Mattias Gaertner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sun, 19 Mar 2006 08:11:56 +0100Vincent Snijders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> Lepidosteus wrote:> > Hello,> >> > For som

Re: [lazarus] 'Interfaces' unit

On 3/19/06, Mattias Gaertner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 19 Mar 2006 06:08:31 -0300 > "Flávio Etrusco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Is there some reason why the 'Interfaces' unit isn't used (declared in > > the 'uses' clause) in Controls.pp or Forms.pp? (so that one wouldn'

Re: [lazarus] 'Interfaces' unit

On Sun, 19 Mar 2006 06:08:31 -0300 "Flávio Etrusco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Is there some reason why the 'Interfaces' unit isn't used (declared in > the 'uses' clause) in Controls.pp or Forms.pp? (so that one wouldn't > need to declare it in the .lpr - and so that if a lose the decla

[lazarus] 'Interfaces' unit

Hi, Is there some reason why the 'Interfaces' unit isn't used (declared in the 'uses' clause) in Controls.pp or Forms.pp? (so that one wouldn't need to declare it in the .lpr - and so that if a lose the declaration somehow in the lpr I wouldn't scratch my head for hours trying to guess why WidgetS

Re: [lazarus] [Bug] Double click on a TreeView cause access violation on win32

On Sun, 19 Mar 2006 08:11:56 +0100 Vincent Snijders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Lepidosteus wrote: > > Hello, > > > > For some reason, I can't post on mantis (i get an error when submitting > > the form) > > > > Under win32 (xp sp2), with lazarus 0.9.12 beta > > > > If you put a TTreeView on