Christian Budde wrote:
Vincent Snijders schrieb:
Christian Budde wrote:
Back to my problem:
i found out that adding: Application.Initialize avoids the access
violation but introduces a bounds check error. Anyway Delphi works
without the need to add Application.Initialize so it must be poss
Vincent Snijders schrieb:
Christian Budde wrote:
Back to my problem:
i found out that adding: Application.Initialize avoids the access
violation but introduces a bounds check error. Anyway Delphi works
without the need to add Application.Initialize so it must be possible.
I've already compa
On Fri, 7 Jul 2006 15:15:24 -0400, J. Peter Mugaas wrote:
> I was running the create_fpc_deb.sh script and I noticed that when
> making both fpc and fpc-src, the script uses the same tarball
> filename
> fpc-2.1.1-060707.tar.gz. That can be very confusing to some people.
>
I did test the Lazarus .
On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 18:45 +0200, Marc Weustink wrote:
> Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
> >> IMO, the amount of spam is still managable. And as long that is the case
> >> there is no need to register.
> > Acctually I´ve being cleaning about 5 spam messages each day.
> Then you are just before
On Fri, 7 Jul 2006 17:00:11 +0200 (Romance Daylight Time)
Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 7 Jul 2006, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
>
> >> Packages exist 'on top of' the LCL. Widgetsets are 'under' the LCL.
Maybe right, maybe wrong.
There is the abstract LCL interface
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
On 7/7/06, Marc Weustink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
IMO, the amount of spam is still managable. And as long that is the case
there is no need to register.
Acctually I´ve being cleaning about 5 spam messages each day.
Then you are just before me. I've onl
On Fri, 7 Jul 2006, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Packages exist 'on top of' the LCL. Widgetsets are 'under' the LCL.
Michael.
Ok, that makes sense, but I am still not sure where it should go...
When you compile the IDE, how does it know where to find things like
the CodeTools, etc..
For now, I
Packages exist 'on top of' the LCL. Widgetsets are 'under' the LCL.
Michael.
Ok, that makes sense, but I am still not sure where it should go...
When you compile the IDE, how does it know where to find things like
the CodeTools, etc..
For now, I am going to create symlinks to my actual code, b
On Fri, 7 Jul 2006, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Hi,
Ok, I am stuck implementing my toolkit into LCL! :-) Yeah, that quick...
Seeing that I don't have a single interface unit to a library like all
the other widgetsets - where am I supposed to put my toolkit code?
(the actual object pascal cod
Hi,
Ok, I am stuck implementing my toolkit into LCL! :-) Yeah, that quick...
Seeing that I don't have a single interface unit to a library like all
the other widgetsets - where am I supposed to put my toolkit code?
(the actual object pascal code for the complete toolkit). I am trying
to imple
On 7/7/06, Marc Weustink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
IMO, the amount of spam is still managable. And as long that is the case
there is no need to register.
Acctually I´ve being cleaning about 5 spam messages each day.
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
_
I agree that gtk1 looks odd but to look native it is better to have QT and a stable gtk2On 7/7/06, Graeme Geldenhuys <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:On 7/6/06, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho<
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > One particular thing you couldconsider is integrating only the X11> version on Lazarus. After
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
Hello,
The current Lazarus forum has some issues, like:
* lot´s of people can´t register (has this being solved?). We need
to solve this in order to force people to register before posting,
because there have being too many spam attacks.
IMO, the amount of s
13 matches
Mail list logo
