On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 18:05:18 -0300
Carlos German Tejero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi to Lazarus Team (sorry for my poor english):
I probe the new FPC generic support, and work fine, but the Lazarus
Code Completion don't understand new generic sintax. For example in
the next code
Code Completion don't understand new generic sintax. For example in
the next code:
program test;
{$apptype console}
{$mode objfpc}{$H+}
uses
SysUtils, Classes;
type
generic TTestTDato = class(TObject)
function sum(a,b:TDato):TDato;
end;
TIntTest
Hi to Lazarus Team (sorry for my poor english):
I probe the new FPC generic support, and work fine, but the Lazarus Code
Completion don't understand new generic sintax. For example in the next
code:
program test;
{$apptype console}
{$mode objfpc}{$H+}
uses
SysUtils, Classes;
type
generic
On 1/19/07, Mattias Gaertner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah. This explains. What Delphi calls 'Code completion' is called
under Lazarus 'Identifier completion'. And 'Code completion' under
Lazarus is a bunch of features including 'Class completion'.
See
On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 17:29:55 +0200
Graeme Geldenhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/18/07, Mattias Gaertner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, the bug is somewhere in the normal class completion.
I added some more verbosity.
I did the same reverse class completion test as before. Here is the
On 1/19/07, Mattias Gaertner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hope that made sense to you... :)
No. Where are the lines 'CreateMissingProcBodies InsertProcBody'?
It does not add any procedure, does it?
Yes it created the stub in the interface section. I just got another
update (r10478) and tried
On Fri, 19 Jan 2007 14:15:34 +0200
Graeme Geldenhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/19/07, Mattias Gaertner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hope that made sense to you... :)
No. Where are the lines 'CreateMissingProcBodies InsertProcBody'?
It does not add any procedure, does it?
Yes it
On Fri, 19 Jan 2007 14:44:01 +0200
Graeme Geldenhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/19/07, Mattias Gaertner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 19 Jan 2007 14:15:34 +0200
Graeme Geldenhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/19/07, Mattias Gaertner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hope that made
On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 08:30:38 +0200
Graeme Geldenhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/17/07, Mattias Gaertner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Using Code Completion (pressing Ctrl-Space) in the interface
section of a class, so I can override a method, formats the code
incorrectly. I have Lazarus's
On 1/18/07, Mattias Gaertner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The 'preview' window is correct. What in generated for Class
Completion is different to the preview.
Strange.
I added two debugln. Please update svn and try to reproduce the bug.
Then send the console output.
Here goes... I've also
On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 14:52:54 +0200
Graeme Geldenhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/18/07, Mattias Gaertner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The 'preview' window is correct. What in generated for Class
Completion is different to the preview.
Strange.
I added two debugln. Please update svn
On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 16:05:35 +0200
Graeme Geldenhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/18/07, Mattias Gaertner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, I forgot: Can you do a reverse class completion?
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Lazarus_IDE_Tools#Reversed_Class_Completion
Then you should see:
On 1/18/07, Mattias Gaertner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, the bug is somewhere in the normal class completion.
I added some more verbosity.
I did the same reverse class completion test as before. Here is the
console output.
---
[graemeg-linux]
Hi,
Using Code Completion (pressing Ctrl-Space) in the interface section
of a class, so I can override a method, formats the code incorrectly.
I have Lazarus's CodeTools Options - Space tab setup to not include
any spaces in front of elements. No checkboxes are checked in the
Insert space in
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 10:11:23 +0200
Graeme Geldenhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Using Code Completion (pressing Ctrl-Space) in the interface section
of a class, so I can override a method, formats the code incorrectly.
I have Lazarus's CodeTools Options - Space tab setup to not include
On 1/17/07, Mattias Gaertner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Using Code Completion (pressing Ctrl-Space) in the interface section
of a class, so I can override a method, formats the code incorrectly.
I have Lazarus's CodeTools Options - Space tab setup to not include
any spaces in front of
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
complained about how long it took to get bugs fixed or features
implement. He waited 5 years for a feature and 2 years for a bug fix.
Lazarus rock! :-)
Unfortunately, not all bugs are fixed so quickly; just take a look at
the bug tracker ;-).
Micha
On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 18:32:26 +1100
Alexander Klenin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok. So GEXpert has a simple word search and not an identifier
search. And this is wanted.
Then the new functions will be called 'Find next word', 'Find
previous word'. Ok?
Perhaps Find next word occurrence or
Ok. So GEXpert has a simple word search and not an identifier search.
And this is wanted.
Then the new functions will be called 'Find next word', 'Find previous
word'. Ok?
Perhaps Find next word occurrence or even Find next occurrence of this word?
I am afraid 'Find next word' will be easily
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 17:41:34 +0200 (Romance Daylight Time)
Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[cut]
At best, make it an option, if you really think it's annoying :-)
I think completion when you're in the implementation section is OK
On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 17:09:20 +0200 (Romance Daylight Time)
Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 17:41:34 +0200 (Romance Daylight Time)
Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[cut]
At best, make it an
Hi,
2 feature requests:
First:
The following has been bugging me since day 1 of Lazarus:
Code completion for methods works from interface - implementation.
However, in Delphi, the following also works:
Given the form declaration:
TForm1 = class(TForm)
private
{ private declarations
On 14/09/06, Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Second:
if you add the 'Gexperts' to the Delphi IDE (highly recommended) then
'ALT Gr'-Arrow Up
or
'ALT Gr'-Arrow Down
('Alt Gr' is the right Alt key) moves to the previous/next occurrence of
the word/identifier you are standing
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 11:30:52 +0200 (Romance Daylight Time)
Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[cut]
Aswering the subject: Both are missing.
And who should I bribe to add these features ? ;-)
Alternatively, whose arm should I twist
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 11:43:35 +0200
Graeme Geldenhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 14/09/06, Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Second:
if you add the 'Gexperts' to the Delphi IDE (highly recommended)
then 'ALT Gr'-Arrow Up
or
'ALT Gr'-Arrow Down
('Alt Gr' is the right
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 11:52:40 +0200 (Romance Daylight Time)
Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 11:30:52 +0200 (Romance Daylight Time)
Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[cut]
Aswering the
On 14/09/06, Mattias Gaertner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Next word or next identifier?
It works by pressing Ctrl-Alt-UpArrow or Ctrl-Alt-DownArrow and
takes the identifier under the cursor and jump to the Next or Prev
occurrence of that identifier. Hence why I call it Identifier
Jumping.
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 11:43:35 +0200
Graeme Geldenhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 14/09/06, Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Second:
if you add the 'Gexperts' to the Delphi IDE (highly recommended)
then 'ALT Gr'-Arrow Up
or
'ALT Gr'-Arrow Down
On 14/09/06, Mattias Gaertner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alternatively, whose arm should I twist ? ;)
I need my arms untwisted for programming.
Mattias
:-)
Maybe after the arm twisting, I can sell you a add-on for Lazarus we
created. A VoiceType Dictation add-on for Lazarus. Just excuse
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 12:17:42 +0200
Luk Vandelaer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 11:43:35 +0200
Graeme Geldenhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 14/09/06, Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Second:
if you add the 'Gexperts' to
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 11:43:35 +0200
Graeme Geldenhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 14/09/06, Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Second:
if you add the 'Gexperts' to the Delphi IDE (highly recommended)
then 'ALT Gr'-Arrow Up
or
'ALT
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 12:17:42 +0200
Luk Vandelaer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 11:43:35 +0200
Graeme Geldenhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 14/09/06, Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 11:52:40 +0200 (Romance Daylight Time)
Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 11:30:52 +0200 (Romance Daylight Time)
Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 11:30:52 +0200 (Romance Daylight Time)
Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
2 feature requests:
First:
The following has been bugging me since day 1 of Lazarus:
Code completion for methods works from interface - implementation
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, Marc Weustink wrote:
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 11:30:52 +0200 (Romance Daylight Time)
Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
2 feature requests:
First:
The following has been bugging me since day 1 of Lazarus:
Code completion for methods
:
Code completion for methods works from interface - implementation.
However, in Delphi, the following also works:
Given the form declaration:
TForm1 = class(TForm)
private
{ private declarations }
public
{ public declarations }
end;
I can type the following
has been bugging me since day 1 of Lazarus:
Code completion for methods works from interface - implementation.
However, in Delphi, the following also works:
Given the form declaration:
TForm1 = class(TForm)
private
{ private declarations }
public
{ public declarations
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 12:42:24 +0200 (Romance Daylight Time)
Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 11:43:35 +0200
Graeme Geldenhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 14/09/06, Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Romance Daylight Time)
Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
2 feature requests:
First:
The following has been bugging me since day 1 of Lazarus:
Code completion for methods works from interface -
implementation.
However, in Delphi, the following also
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Ok. So GEXpert has a simple word search and not an identifier search.
And this is wanted.
Then the new functions will be called 'Find next word', 'Find previous
word'. Ok?
From a complete outsider who has never used this function yet: wouldn't
an identifier search be
On 14/09/06, Micha Nelissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Ok. So GEXpert has a simple word search and not an identifier search.
And this is wanted.
Then the new functions will be called 'Find next word', 'Find previous
word'. Ok?
From a complete outsider who has never
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
From a complete outsider who has never used this function yet: wouldn't
an identifier search be more useful ? Usually you want to find where a
variable is written or something like that. At least, that's what I
often need. (But use 'regular' Find for).
That's the
On Fri, 30 Sep 2005 09:03:09 +0200
Matthijs Willemstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 20:21 +0200, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Pressing ctrlshiftC (thus invoking code completion) a new skeleton
for procedure TFoo.FooProc is made. I think this is not the correct
behaviour.
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 21:10:31 +0200
Matthijs Willemstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
When I have the following code:
type
TFoo = class
procedure FooProc;
end;
After invoking code completion the skeleton of procedure TFoo.FooProc is
created. Then I change the definition
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 21:10:31 +0200
Matthijs Willemstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
When I have the following code:
type
TFoo = class
procedure FooProc;
end;
After invoking code completion the skeleton of procedure TFoo.FooProc is
created. Then I change
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 14:35:59 -0400
Tony Maro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 21:10:31 +0200
Matthijs Willemstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
When I have the following code:
type
TFoo = class
procedure FooProc;
end;
After
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 14:35:59 -0400
Tony Maro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wouldn't automatic adapting make overloading harder?
Why?
The result as
happens now is it basically gets created like it's overloaded...
Yes.
But in the case, that the class
On 9/28/05, Matthijs Willemstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
When I have the following code:
type
TFoo = class
procedure FooProc;
end;
After invoking code completion the skeleton of procedure TFoo.FooProc is
created. Then I change the definition to read as follows:
type
On 9/19/05, Mattias Gaertner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can submit a feature request in the bug tracker for an option to let
class completion check members in ancestors.
Done.
Issue number #1189
_
To unsubscribe: mail
Hi all,
yestarday I had an annoying problem with Kylix 3 at work and decided
to try if this happens in Lazarus. The situation is the following :
{ TBaseObject - a base class (3rd party component) }
TBaseObject = class
On Mon, 19 Sep 2005 22:18:30 +0300
Alexander Todorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
yestarday I had an annoying problem with Kylix 3 at work and decided
to try if this happens in Lazarus. The situation is the following :
51 matches
Mail list logo
