/07 12:07
Subject: Re: [lazarus] Console app problems
Maybe it is a rare taste but I personally prefer to use code like this
if XX then begin
end;//if
with A do begin
end;//with
while C do begin
end;//while
etc.
I find very easy to locate the closing END using this little
On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 10:53:40PM +0100, Christian Iversen wrote:
Not really IMHO. C has many more, mostly due to macro's.
I don't think I follow. Isn't macro style mostly like function style?
The macro itself is that style, but the place where the macro is placed
doesn't have to
On Thursday 04 January 2007 11:35, Marco van de Voort wrote:
On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 10:53:40PM +0100, Christian Iversen wrote:
Not really IMHO. C has many more, mostly due to macro's.
I don't think I follow. Isn't macro style mostly like function style?
The macro itself is
Maybe it is a rare taste but I personally prefer to use code like this
if XX then begin
end;//if
with A do begin
end;//with
while C do begin
end;//while
etc.
I find very easy to locate the closing END using this little comment after it.
What do you think? Does it look wrong
IMHO I always liked the:
if AAA then
begin
statements
...
...
end;
For me is the most cleared for writing code.
El Jueves, 4 de Enero de 2007 13:07, Samuel Cartaxo escribió:
Maybe it is a rare taste but I personally prefer to use code like this
if XX then begin
end;//if
with
On Thu, 4 Jan 2007 13:14:23 +0100
Giuseppe Luigi Punzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMHO I always liked the:
if AAA then
begin
statements
...
...
end;
For me is the most cleared for writing code.
IMHO a good code beautifier should be configurable and support all the
mentioned
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 05:51:03PM +0100, Christian Iversen wrote:
for (...) {
}
which, imho, only looks good in C.
That is practically the only (really existing) layout that I despise.
Then again, there are probably even more coding styles in Pascal than in C.
Not really IMHO. C has
On Wednesday 03 January 2007 10:29, Marco van de Voort wrote:
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 05:51:03PM +0100, Christian Iversen wrote:
for (...) {
}
which, imho, only looks good in C.
That is practically the only (really existing) layout that I despise.
I don't think it looks that bad in C,
On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 02:15:43PM +0100, Christian Iversen wrote:
Then again, there are probably even more coding styles in Pascal than in
C.
Not really IMHO. C has many more, mostly due to macro's.
I don't think I follow. Isn't macro style mostly like function style?
The macro
On Wednesday 03 January 2007 22:50, Marco van de Voort wrote:
On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 02:15:43PM +0100, Christian Iversen wrote:
Then again, there are probably even more coding styles in Pascal than
in C.
Not really IMHO. C has many more, mostly due to macro's.
I don't think I
On Sunday 31 December 2006 01:51, Lee Jenkins wrote:
Christian Iversen wrote:
I much prefer
for X := 0 to 99 do
begin
FooStuff();
end;
Hmm. That's nice too.
Naturally it's a matter of taste, but I really cannot get used to the
indenting of begin-end. It just looks wierd to me,
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 03:19:32PM +0100, Christian Iversen wrote:
It's something like
for (int x = 0; x 99; x++)
{
FooStuff();
}
Doesn't that look odd, too?
No, why? I always do that.
_
To unsubscribe:
On Tuesday 02 January 2007 17:36, Marco van de Voort wrote:
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 03:19:32PM +0100, Christian Iversen wrote:
It's something like
for (int x = 0; x 99; x++)
{
FooStuff();
}
Doesn't that look odd, too?
No, why? I always do that.
I don't know, it just
Christian Iversen wrote:
On Sunday 31 December 2006 01:51, Lee Jenkins wrote:
Christian Iversen wrote:
I much prefer
for X := 0 to 99 do
begin
FooStuff();
end;
Hmm. That's nice too.
Naturally it's a matter of taste, but I really cannot get used to the
indenting of begin-end. It just
On Tuesday 02 January 2007 19:33, Lee Jenkins wrote:
Christian Iversen wrote:
On Sunday 31 December 2006 01:51, Lee Jenkins wrote:
Christian Iversen wrote:
I much prefer
for X := 0 to 99 do
begin
FooStuff();
end;
Hmm. That's nice too.
Naturally it's a matter of taste,
Lee Jenkins wrote:
for (int x = 0; x 99; x++)
{
FooStuff();
}
Doesn't that look odd, too?
This is exactly the way that I format those blocks in C#!
And without braces ? Like:
for (int x = 0; x 99; x++)
FooStuff();
? Or FooStuff indented 2 more spaces ?
Micha
Micha Nelissen wrote:
And without braces ? Like:
for (int x = 0; x 99; x++)
FooStuff();
? Or FooStuff indented 2 more spaces ?
Micha
The indentation.
Lee
--
Warm Regards,
Lee
_
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL
Hi all,
I'm try to write a console application that interfaces with Asterisk
PBX. The pbx communicates with the console application over stndin and
stdout.
The problem that I'm having is that when I send a command using WriteLn,
the command doesn't return as it should so I'm wonder if
On 12/30/06, Lee Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I'm try to write a console application that interfaces with Asterisk
PBX. The pbx communicates with the console application over stndin and
stdout.
Sorry for the question, but are you on the right library to use AGI ?
The problem
ik wrote:
On 12/30/06, Lee Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I'm try to write a console application that interfaces with Asterisk
PBX. The pbx communicates with the console application over stndin and
stdout.
Sorry for the question, but are you on the right library to use AGI ?
On 12/30/06, Lee Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ik wrote:
On 12/30/06, Lee Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I'm try to write a console application that interfaces with Asterisk
PBX. The pbx communicates with the console application over stndin and
stdout.
Sorry for the
ik wrote:
Nop, I meant that does your program is located in the right location
to use AGI (I still learn Asterisk, so I'm not sure that my question
is correct) :)
I'm sure you use the best programming language in the list you gave :D
Good News!
First, I have fixed it (or worked around) and
Lee Jenkins wrote:
Hi all,
I'm try to write a console application that interfaces with Asterisk
PBX. The pbx communicates with the console application over stndin and
stdout.
Hi all, after trying a number of different ways to get this to work, I
have found a way.
For some reason, it
ik wrote:
Good luck, and if you can please share your sources :)
Please find attached a simple unit to use for now. I will be finishing
the more robust version in a few days (weeks?) as time permits.
--
Warm Regards,
Lee
On 12/30/06, Lee Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ik wrote:
Good luck, and if you can please share your sources :)
Please find attached a simple unit to use for now. I will be finishing
the more robust version in a few days (weeks?) as time permits.
Cool, a question:
repeat;
begin
ik wrote:
repeat;
begin
ReadLn(sRead);
bDone := self.ProcessSingleVar(sRead);
end;
until (bDone);
LOL. Just makes it more readable for me. When I have to come back to
some code later on (6 month, 1 year from now) I want to be as easy to
sift through as possible. A little extra
Lee Jenkins wrote:
repeat;
begin
ReadLn(sRead);
bDone := self.ProcessSingleVar(sRead);
end;
until (bDone);
LOL. Just makes it more readable for me. When I have to come back to
The above is more readable than the following to you ? (Just asking)
repeat
ReadLn(sRead);
bDone :=
Micha Nelissen wrote:
Lee Jenkins wrote:
repeat;
begin
ReadLn(sRead);
bDone := self.ProcessSingleVar(sRead);
end;
until (bDone);
LOL. Just makes it more readable for me. When I have to come back to
The above is more readable than the following to you ? (Just asking)
repeat
On Sunday 31 December 2006 00:07, Lee Jenkins wrote:
Micha Nelissen wrote:
Lee Jenkins wrote:
repeat;
begin
ReadLn(sRead);
bDone := self.ProcessSingleVar(sRead);
end;
until (bDone);
LOL. Just makes it more readable for me. When I have to come back to
The above is more
.
Darius
- Original Message -
From: Lee Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lazarus@miraclec.com
Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2006 3:49 PM
Subject: [lazarus] Console app problems
Hi all,
I'm try to write a console application that interfaces with Asterisk PBX.
The pbx communicates
Darius Blaszijk wrote:
Hi Lee,
I was following this thread with great interest. Is there somewhere a
description how communication is defined in pbx? What commands are used
and how are they structured? I personally don't know anything about
asterisk but I am interested in this way of
Christian Iversen wrote:
I much prefer
for X := 0 to 99 do
begin
FooStuff();
end;
Hmm. That's nice too.
I used to Capitalize keywords too, but I've never only capitalized the first
keyword in a block - that's pretty obscure to me :)
I'm a big camel case kind of guy. I
@miraclec.com
Onderwerp: Re: [lazarus] Console app problems
Micha Nelissen wrote:
Lee Jenkins wrote:
repeat;
begin
ReadLn(sRead);
bDone := self.ProcessSingleVar(sRead);
end;
until (bDone);
LOL. Just makes it more readable for me. When I have to come back
to
The above is more
33 matches
Mail list logo
