Re: [Lcms-user] ILM's CTL on SF

2006-12-15 Thread Graeme Gill
darby johnston wrote: > How does this compare to lcms? Is it complementary or > a substitute? It's not a CMM or CMS, it doesn't handle ICC profiles, it just seems to be a C like language with a couple of built in functions. In relation to describing color, one could well ask the question "Why ?"

Re: [Lcms-user] ILM's CTL on SF

2006-12-15 Thread Kai-Uwe Behrmann
Am 15.12.06, 08:53 -0800 schrieb darby johnston: > --- Kai-Uwe Behrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > just for your information: > > > > The Color Transformation Language code was brought > > recently to > > SourceForge. > > How does this compare to lcms? Is it complementary or > a substitu

Re: [Lcms-user] ILM's CTL on SF

2006-12-15 Thread darby johnston
--- Kai-Uwe Behrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > just for your information: > > The Color Transformation Language code was brought > recently to > SourceForge. How does this compare to lcms? Is it complementary or a substitute? The sourceforge page lists the license as "other/proprietary", bu

[Lcms-user] ILM's CTL on SF

2006-12-15 Thread Kai-Uwe Behrmann
Dear readers, just for your information: The Color Transformation Language code was brought recently to SourceForge. Read more: http://www.behrmann.name/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=64&Itemid=92 regards Kai-Uwe Behrmann + development for color mana