On Tuesday, October 24, 2006 7:49 AM Jesse Stay wrote:
IANAL but it *shouldn't* be okay to download movies and music that weren't
intended to be downloaded for free, but it *is* legal. Fair use doctrine...
Actually, fair use doctrine is *not* applied to downloads. Fair use only
says that
On 10/24/06, David Fagerstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since cream has caused people to leave the church,
Huh?
Bryan
___
Ldsoss mailing list
Ldsoss@lists.ldsoss.org
http://lists.ldsoss.org/mailman/listinfo/ldsoss
I wrote a neat little search engine plugin for Firefox 2.0:
http://scott.barberfam.com/wp/2006/10/24/firefox-20-lds-scriptures-search-engine-plugin/
Use it, share it, pass it on. Who know what other crazy Mormon besides
me would use it.
-Scott
___
On Oct 25, 2006, at 7:01 AM, Steven H. McCown wrote:
The new Boy Scout patch may serve Hollywood, but it also serves to
educate
in an effort to teach Scouts about the current law. The patch will
help
teach scouts how not to make their parents liable for large sums of
money.
The purpose of
On 10/25/06, Jay Askren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe we need to have someone create another mailing list covering
intellectual property, copyright law, and what is legal and what is not.
This topic seems to come up a lot, and I it seems that people really like to
argue about it. It would be
It's always interesting to see people being clear about justifying their
position. To summarize your post, you have stated that you don't care what
the law is, because you will do as you choose -- illegal or not.
That is your prerogative. I caution you to be careful, because you are
willfully
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 06:36:35AM -0700, Bryan Murdock wrote:
On 10/24/06, David Fagerstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since cream has caused people to leave the church,
Huh?
A reference to Thomas B Marsh, I suspect. Or at least that was my first
thought.
Now, can we get back to discussing
