On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 04:15:11PM -0600, David Douthitt scribbled:
> > Actually, modules.lrp should prolly be loaded sooner
> > rather than later; then you're looking pretty much at a base
> > LRP system loaded early followed by secondary packages loaded
> > later.
>
> I'm not sure what you mean
On 22 Jan 2001, at 19:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Can't mount 'em till etc.lrp is loaded; it might do to have it
> load ASAP, then deal with things like fstab, then load other
> packages.
Makes sense.
> Actually, modules.lrp should prolly be loaded sooner
> rather than later; then you're lo
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 12:17:26PM -0600, David Douthitt scribbled:
> I've been wondering about this problem, and wondered what you all
> thought about it. The problem is this: a volume is typically
> mounted as one of the first parts of the system start process (in
> the rc scripts), and load
See my other replies to this...rinetd is obsolete and not as
good as port forwarding.
On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 10:01:28AM -0800, Mike Noyes scribbled:
> Did anyone else notice this thread started by Ray on the linux-router list?
> Is rinted usefull?
>
> >Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 13:12:22 -0800
> >
Well, I'll be damned..it's all over the place. Cleaning it up now. :)
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 09:30:44AM -0800, Kenneth Hadley scribbled:
> http://lrp.c0wz.com/index.html under banners (linux.com) >
>
> Send comments, suggestions, whatever to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I'll
> listen.
> Virus alert! A
I've been wondering about this problem, and wondered what you all
thought about it. The problem is this: a volume is typically
mounted as one of the first parts of the system start process (in
the rc scripts), and loading packages before this happens can be
difficult.
For example, you have p
Everyone,
I backed up the DocManager this morning. I'm going to start integrating the
documents in our anonymous ftp area into the DocManager.
I've started the DocBook version of David's Developer Guide. I hope to have
something to show everyone by the end of the week.
I have the following sup
http://lrp.c0wz.com/index.html under banners (linux.com) >
Send comments, suggestions, whatever to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I'll
listen.
Virus alert! All email server admins please click here...
What happens when computer people go camping...
RFC 2795: The Infinite Monkey Protocol Suite (IMPS)
Wh
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 09:08:31AM -0800, Kenneth Hadley scribbled:
> actually I emailed you about it but your site contains your old email
> address ;-)
> bouncing mail is ALWAYS fun ;-)
Eh? Which addy bounced?
All addresses except [EMAIL PROTECTED] ought to still be valid.
That said, I was ex
actually I emailed you about it but your site contains your old email
address ;-)
bouncing mail is ALWAYS fun ;-)
I intend to put a forward on my crosswind.net accountjust currently one
probim unable to upload anything
-Kenneth Hadley
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTE
I have recently added support for software RAID array and SCSI drives to my
LRP system. I have updated the LRP Hard Disk HOWTO, created a raid.lrp
package, and compiled a new kernel to get this running.
The updated Hard Disk HOWTO covers how to get linuxrc (the program that
loads all the LRP fil
You should try to keep your old site up-to-date with this.
I've changed the PPPoE Images link on lrp.c0wz.com to point to
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/khadley/
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 07:33:56AM -0800, Mike Noyes scribbled:
> An updated PPPoE image is now available at:
>
> http://leaf.sourceforg
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 03:53:48PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribbled:
> so it means that it can be used to manage some sort of authentication, and
> decide to proxy or not, based on several other properties than those in
> tcp/ip?
No, I think rinetd is a 'dumb' proxy, that is, it can't do anythi
> Off-topic: has anyone managed to 'build' a vpn from a linux
gateway(conneted
> to one endpoint network), trouhgt internet to several win2k clients?
I've not done this directly (I link LRP<>LRP using IPSec), but the FreeS/WAN
IPSec package I run supposedly interops with NT2K. See docs on the
Fr
so it means that it can be used to manage some sort of authentication, and
decide to proxy or not, based on several other properties than those in
tcp/ip?
that is a good way to implement another level of authentication for systems
like mine, I have a internal exchange machine that sends all its o
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 02:59:08PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribbled:
> I don't get it, what makes rinetd different from 'ipportfw/ipautofw' or
> 'ipmasqdm portfw/autofw'???
I could be entirely wrong...but...
Rinetd is actually a proxy; portfw/autofw are more similar to routing
protocols. There
I don't get it, what makes rinetd different from 'ipportfw/ipautofw' or
'ipmasqdm portfw/autofw'???
is a deamon process any better than a kernel process?
pedro
> -Original Message-
> From: David Douthitt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 2:33 PM
> To: [EMAIL PR
On 21 Jan 2001, at 18:19, Mike Noyes wrote:
> Is rinted usefull?
>
> >Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 13:12:22 -0800
> >From: John Wenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: Linux Router Project <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: [LRP] rinetd - a TCP port redirector: High Performance Holes
> >through Firewalls fo
18 matches
Mail list logo
