Mike Noyes, 2001-03-12 16:15 -0800
>Vote totals as of 2001-03-13 24:36:00 GMT
Time stamp should be: 2001-03-13 00:36:00 GMT
>11 developer votes cast 20 pending
>
>phpWebSite11
>Current Site 0
>
>All LEAF developers,
>Please get your votes in by Monday (Mar. 19). Thanks.
--
Mike Noyes <[EM
On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, David Douthitt wrote:
> * Tried to remove EVERYTHING and ANYTHING located
> in root.lrp that required backups: thus, root.lrp
> should be completely static for almost all purposes.
> (if it isn't, I'm not done :)
As a note, on the lazy side of things - since
Vote totals as of 2001-03-13 24:36:00 GMT
11 developer votes cast 20 pending
phpWebSite11
Current Site 0
All LEAF developers,
Please get your votes in by Monday (Mar. 19). Thanks.
--
Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/
Paul Batozech, 2001-03-12 18:36 -0600
>Mike Noyes wrote:
> > Please vote on whether we should change over to phpWebSite, or remain
> > with our current site.
>
>As expressed by others, I'll go with the php website for functionality,
>but I'd prefer a color scheme more in line with the old site. I
Mike Noyes wrote:
>
> Mike Noyes, 2001-03-09 08:21 -0800
> >We still have a potential security problem with this software. I'm investigating
>possible solutions at this time.
>
> Everyone,
> Eric and I now feel that the phpWebSite security is sufficient for our needs.
>
> Please vote on whethe
David Douthitt, 2001-03-12 16:14 -0600
>Mike Noyes wrote:
> >
> > David Douthitt, 2001-03-12 14:30 -0600
> > >One vote for me...
> >
> > David,
> > Is that a vote for the current page, or a vote for phpWebSite?
>
>One for phpWeb...
David,
One vote for phpWebSite.
--
Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Mike Noyes wrote:
>
> David Douthitt, 2001-03-12 14:30 -0600
> >One vote for me...
>
> David,
> Is that a vote for the current page, or a vote for phpWebSite?
One for phpWeb...
> >I like the original colors of http://leaf.sourceforge.net/ ...
>
> I do too. It looks like development of a new t
David Douthitt, 2001-03-12 14:30 -0600
>One vote for me...
David,
Is that a vote for the current page, or a vote for phpWebSite?
>I like the original colors of http://leaf.sourceforge.net/ ...
I do too. It looks like development of a new theme is our first job.
--
Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
George Metz, 2001-03-12 15:07 -0500
>By the way Mike, not sure that you're aware, but the title for the
>phpwebsite page seems to have been placed in twice. Thought you should
>know. =)
George,
Thanks for letting me know about that. I just fixed it.
--
Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://leaf.
On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, George Metz wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, Jack Coates wrote:
>
> > Background, for those who haven't downloaded it yet:
>
> Didn't know it was that far along. Will see about taking a peek.
>
I wouldn't say far along, but thanks for the peek :-)
>
> > 1-b) This is somewhat
> > c) a local harddisk is assumed, which the /var directory will be
> > written to.
> > c1) persistence of /var means lrpkg/ needs to move
> > elsewhere.
>
> Why?
No real good reason - just trying to keep system and data separate. If
/var is reserv
Eric Wolzak, 2001-03-12 22:35 +0100
>a little reluctantly I vote for the phpwebsite too.
>It certainly has more possibilities, but as with all active server
>pages, there is also a lot of "but's"
Eric,
One vote for phpWebSite.
--
Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/
_
Steven Peck, 2001-03-12 11:59 -0800
>My vote is for the phpWebsite.
>
>One quesiton though, why didn't you use the built in Survey for this
>question? :) j/k
Steven,
One vote for phpWebSite. I didn't use the Survey because anyone can vote there, not
just developers.
--
Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PRO
Jack Coates, 2001-03-12 11:50 -0800
>that's a "I like the web site" vote. For colors, I'd like to see greens
>and blues and maybe some brown, to go with the leaf motif.
Jack,
Ok, thanks for clarifying that. One vote for phpWebSite with a new theme.
>On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, Mike Noyes wrote:
>
> >
a little reluctantly I vote for the phpwebsite too.
It certainly has more possibilities, but as with all active server
pages, there is also a lot of "but's"
Steven wrote
>
> One quesiton though, why didn't you use the built in Survey for this
> question? :) j/k
>
The survey is kind of fu
Thus spoke David Douthitt:
> * Using a new glibc means you are no longer able to use a floppy
> (probably).
Especially if combined with a 2.4 kernel.
> * Linux 2.4 is not really yet fully solid and stable; wait for 2.4.9 :)
For the class of hw generally used under LRP, I don't think that the
s
One vote for me...
I like the original colors of http://leaf.sourceforge.net/ ...
___
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, Jack Coates wrote:
> Background, for those who haven't downloaded it yet:
Didn't know it was that far along. Will see about taking a peek.
> b) "the minimum" of system configuration files. In my dreams,
> that's two files: linuxrc and ladybug.conf.
> c)
Jack Coates wrote:
> Ladybug is based loosely on Oxygen, [...]
The newer version should be nicer for you, for two reasons:
* More programs removed from root.lrp into their
own packages, meaning root.lrp is smaller and
the overall boot disk is more configurable
* Tried to remove EVE
By the way Mike, not sure that you're aware, but the title for the
phpwebsite page seems to have been placed in twice. Thought you should
know. =)
--
George Metz
Commercial Routing Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"We know what deterrence was with 'mutually assured destruction' during
the Cold War. Bu
My vote is for the phpWebsite.
One quesiton though, why didn't you use the built in Survey for this
question? :) j/k
I'm actually implementing phpWebsite at home, looks like lots of fun.
-Steven Peck
-Original Message-
From: Mike Noyes
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 3/12/2001 9:19 AM
that's a "I like the web site" vote. For colors, I'd like to see greens
and blues and maybe some brown, to go with the leaf motif.
--
Jack Coates
Monkeynoodle: It's what's for dinner!
On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, Mike Noyes wrote:
> Jack Coates, 2001-03-12 10:47 -0800
> >1 vote for me.
>
> Jack,
> One
Jack Coates, 2001-03-12 10:47 -0800
>1 vote for me.
Jack,
One vote for you, or is that an abstain?
--
Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/
___
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinf
Background, for those who haven't downloaded it yet:
Ladybug is based loosely on Oxygen, and the conversion from Oxygen to
Ladybug has proceeded with these tenets in mind:
1) The "idiot image" main system should be dirt simple.
a) two .lrp's, root and etc.
b) "the minimum" of sys
[EMAIL PROTECTED], 2001-03-11 13:52 -0500
>As much as I prefer the layout and colors of the old site, there's
>no denying the functionality of the phpwebsite..so I reluctantly
>vote php.
Rick,
One vote for phpWebSite.
It looks like everyone agrees the default theme is undesirable. Even the phpWe
Scott C. Best, 2001-03-12 10:22 -0800
>Mike:
> My vote as well for the phpWebSite.
Scott,
One vote for phpWebSite.
>Though, I really enjoy the rotten-avacado green and baby-poop brown
>color theme. Please don't change them. I'll be painting my whole house
>this coming week to match...
George Metz, 2001-03-12 13:40 -0500
>On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, Mike Noyes wrote:
>
> > Everyone,
> > Please vote on whether we should change over to phpWebSite, or remain
> > with our current site.
>
>PHPWebSite gets my vote.
George,
One vote for phpWebSite.
--
Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://l
1 vote for me. Guess I better get back to work on Ladybug :-) The
for-money job kicked up in the last few weeks, and I've had to do
another round of upgrade-and-swap with some family computers. Despite
any documentation to the contrary, the AMD K6-2 and K6-3 have a 95MHz
frontside bus, not a 100MH
As much as I prefer the layout and colors of the old site, there's
no denying the functionality of the phpwebsite..so I reluctantly
vote php.
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 09:19:46AM -0800, Mike Noyes scribbled:
> Mike Noyes, 2001-03-09 08:21 -0800
> >We still have a potential security problem with thi
On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, Mike Noyes wrote:
> Everyone,
> Eric and I now feel that the phpWebSite security is sufficient for our needs.
>
> Please vote on whether we should change over to phpWebSite, or remain with our
>current site.
PHPWebSite gets my vote.
--
George Metz
Commercial Routing Engin
Mike:
My vote as well for the phpWebSite. Though, I
really enjoy the rotten-avacado green and baby-poop
brown color theme. Please don't change them. I'll be
painting my whole house this coming week to match...
-Scott
___
Leaf-devel
Kenneth Hadley, 2001-03-12 09:38 -0800
>my vote is for the phpWebsite
Kenneth,
One vote for phpWebsite.
>though the colors don't agree with me :-)
Noted. Luckily, there are other themes to choose from. Also, an API in v0.8.0 will let
us develop themes of our own. :)
--
Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROT
[EMAIL PROTECTED], 2001-03-12 17:42 +
>my vote goes for the phpwebsite.
Pedro,
One vote for phpWebSite.
>ps: please change the colors! ;)
Noted. We'll change the default theme if phpWebSite is chosen. :)
--
Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/
_
my vote is for the phpWebsite
though the colors don't agree with me :-)
-Kenneth Hadley
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Noyes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 9:19 AM
Subject: [Leaf-devel] phpWebSite Vote
> Mike Noyes, 2001-03-09 08:21 -0800
my vote goes for the phpwebsite.
ps: please change the colors! ;)
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Noyes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 5:20 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Leaf-devel] phpWebSite Vote
>
>
> Mike Noyes, 2001-03-09 08:21 -0800
> >We sti
Mike Noyes, 2001-03-09 08:21 -0800
>We still have a potential security problem with this software. I'm investigating
>possible solutions at this time.
Everyone,
Eric and I now feel that the phpWebSite security is sufficient for our needs.
Please vote on whether we should change over to phpWebSi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't Oxygen use 'ip' as it's
> command to setup such things? If so, then the variables you
> used above are indeed going to be ignored; the netmask goes
> in the line below:
>
> > IF1_IPADDR=63.194.213.179
>
> like this:
>
> > IF1_IPAD
Matthew Schalit wrote:
> Thanks for the suggestion. I went ahead and set, in network.conf,
> the following variables that work in 2.9.4 and 2.9.8:
>
> IF1_NETMASK=255.255.255.0
>
> IF2_NETMASK-255.255.255.0
>
> but it didn't make any difference. I guess those variables are
> not us
Matthew Schalit wrote:
> Ok the timeout only happends during the first setup, and after that
> goes away. That's was my problem. The first time through, I had no idea
> that setup was going to run, and it sounded very important. However,
> due to the relatively short timeout, I never got a cha
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 10:15:18PM -0800, Matthew Schalit scribbled:
> Thanks for the suggestion. I went ahead and set, in network.conf,
> the following variables that work in 2.9.4 and 2.9.8:
>
> IF1_NETMASK=255.255.255.0
>
> IF2_NETMASK-255.255.255.0
>
> but it didn't make any di
40 matches
Mail list logo
