On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 08:20:07PM +0200, Ewald Wasscher wrote:
> George Metz wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Ewald Wasscher wrote:
> >
> >
> > Could be a Red Hat problem, could not be. I didn't compile IPTables for
> > 2.0.7 myself, someone else did; they're the ones to ask. I got the
> > mod
David Douthitt wrote:
> Mike Noyes wrote:
>
>> Does anyone have an answer to this question on the leaf-user list?
>>
>> Re: [Leaf-user] Cdrom as second floppy ?
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/leaf-user%40lists.sourceforge.net/msg00038.html
>
>
> Some older versions of busybox, as well as some
On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 08:47:48PM +0200, Ewald Wasscher scribbled:
> > Too many package formats use .tgz as their name.
> >
> > What if we started using bzip2 for our packages and called
> > them .tbz? Nobody uses .tbz for _anything_ not even bzip2'd
> > tar files.
>
> Would be nice (see my las
On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 08:40:43PM +0200, Ewald Wasscher scribbled:
> > I seem to be somewhat alone in that I *LIKE* the *.lrp packaging;
> Personally I like the simpicity.
Me, I like the simplicity more than the simpicity. ;)
> That's a good point. I quite often open on windows machines using
On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 06:29:16AM -0500, David Douthitt scribbled:
> My understanding is that tar takes your pathname as specified when you
> pack. For example,
>
> tar cvf file.tar .
> ...creates files with names like "./myfile1" "./myfile2" etc.
>
> tar cvf file.tar *
> ...creates files with
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 04:51:59PM -0500, David Douthitt scribbled:
>
>> I seem to be somewhat alone in that I *LIKE* the *.lrp packaging;
>> there is only one change I would make: rename the files from *.lrp to
>> *.tgz. This adds the ability to know what the file fo
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 06:19:01PM -0500, David Douthitt scribbled:
> > Too many package formats use .tgz as their name.
>
> No, there is only one: a file that has been created by tar and
> compressed by gzip. Everything else is a file.
Slackware, FreeBSD, and OpenBSD all distribute their packa
David Douthitt wrote:
> I seem to be somewhat alone in that I *LIKE* the *.lrp packaging;
Personally I like the simpicity.
> there is only one change I would make: rename the files from *.lrp to
> *.tgz. This adds the ability to know what the file format is, and
> allows Windows hosts to decip
George Metz wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Ewald Wasscher wrote:
>
>
> Could be a Red Hat problem, could not be. I didn't compile IPTables for
> 2.0.7 myself, someone else did; they're the ones to ask. I got the
> modified root.lrp from ftp.linux-router.com, and since I'm having "issues"
> gettin
Mike Noyes wrote:
> Does anyone have an answer to this question on the leaf-user list?
>
> Re: [Leaf-user] Cdrom as second floppy ?
> http://www.mail-archive.com/leaf-user%40lists.sourceforge.net/msg00038.html
Some older versions of busybox, as well as some other versions of
mount will refuse t
Mike Noyes wrote:
> Does anyone have an answer to this question on the leaf-user list?
>
> Re: [Leaf-user] Cdrom as second floppy ?
> http://www.mail-archive.com/leaf-user%40lists.sourceforge.net/msg00038.html
>
Well, try to mount the system read-only!
# mount -r -t iso9660 /dev/hda /cdrom
The
Does anyone have an answer to this question on the leaf-user list?
Re: [Leaf-user] Cdrom as second floppy ?
http://www.mail-archive.com/leaf-user%40lists.sourceforge.net/msg00038.html
--
Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/
___
Jeff:
heya...
> > Jeff:
> > Sorry you don't agree.
>
> Well, I am too. I feel like one of us is operating under some
> misconceptions about how lrpkg or tar works. By continuing this
> thread, I hope to grok your concern, or perhaps you will find your
> concerns were not justified.
Mike Noyes, 2001-04-06 06:55 -0700
>An interview with Midori Linux project leader Dan Quinlan
>http://linuxdevices.com/articles/AT6094731607.html
Midori target specs from the article above:
~ A stripped-down system with X, but no large applications, fits within
~ 8MB of Flash storage memory, comp
David Douthitt, 2001-04-06 06:03 -0500
>According to the specifications, to build Midori requires 1.5G and to
>run it about 200M. This puts it into a different class than the usual
>LRP router, which runs with less than about 2M or 4M of system storage
>"space" ...
David,
Aren't those the specs
> Actually I like .lrp as well, though my complaint
> with it is different. I find it difficult to extract files
> from a .lrp without potentially overwriting important system
> binaries on the development box.
> What'd be *much* nicer is if package.lrp expanded
> to /tmp/package, and then /tmp/pa
On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, S.C.Best wrote:
> Jeff:
> Sorry you don't agree. What I mean to say was, suppose
> my currently running system has a working /etc/dnscache (for
> example). I'd be ill advised to extract a new dnscache.lrp without
> carefully controlling where it untar's. The defaults wou
I'm surprised no one is understanding this complaint; I think I
understand it perfectly. It has occurred to me also.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, S.C.Best wrote:
> > I'd be ill advised to extract a new dnscache.lrp without
> > carefully controlling where it untar's. The def
Jonathan French wrote:
> I've been upgrading to 2.9.8/2.0.36, and I finally decided to try out
> Matthew Schalit's rc.pf script. I'd like to present to the developers
> what I worked out before I post the linuxrouter.org, to flush out any
> errors. I decided to figure out how to allow for dhcp,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Scott C. Best wrote:
>
> >
> > Actually I like .lrp as well, though my complaint
> > with it is different. I find it difficult to extract files
> > from a .lrp without potentially overwriting important system
> > binaries on the development
Mike Noyes wrote:
>
> The Midori Linux project wants someone to build a router based on Midori.
>
> http://midori.transmeta.com/projects.shtml
> >If you know of someone working on one of the ideas listed here, (let us
> >know on the midori-discuss mailing list and we'll update our references.
>
21 matches
Mail list logo
