On 30 Apr 2001, at 22:17, Ewald Wasscher wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Ironic that Matthew (the fellow who did Materhorn) was the
> > bridgeutils maintainer, and has now left it stagnate until someone
> > else picked it up.
> AFAIK the 2.4 kernel needs other bridge utils than Matthew'
On 1 May 2001, at 15:19, Ewald Wasscher wrote:
> Wouldn't it be a good idea to have a default way of building packages,
> like Debian? With Debian you can cd into the upacked/patched source
> directory and do a dpkg-buildpackage -b and voila! a binary package
> appears after a while. So we cou
Ewald Wasscher, 2001-05-01 20:24 +0200
>Mike Noyes wrote:
>David proposed something like this already. Take a look at this patch.
>>Source code + diffs for CVS
>>https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=412704&group_id=13751 \
>>&atid=313751
>
>I like the basic idea a lot. What I don't lik
On 30 Apr 2001, at 19:32, KP Kirchdörfer wrote:
> I've also an lrp package for dinosaurs available - rexx.lrp based on Ian
> Colliers REXX/imc.
I've seen REXX, but never got into coding it. I've looked at it a
time or two; may even have some DOS versions. If you like REXX, you
might like my co
Mike Noyes wrote:
> Ewald Wasscher, 2001-05-01 16:11 +0200
>
>> Mike Noyes wrote:
>>
>>> The package tree will mimic the Debian source tree. Diff files
>>> should not be gziped. Other than that minor change, do what Debian
>>> does.
>>> http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/dists/stable/main/sourc
On Tue, 1 May 2001, Eric Wolzak wrote:
> You are right about that. I hoped that I didn't need it but I 'm not
> that firm with pipes and that kind of things. anything temporary
> sounding would be good :)
Heh. If it makes you feel better, I only barely understand the script as
displayed. =)
> I
Ewald Wasscher, 2001-05-01 16:11 +0200
>Mike Noyes wrote:
>
>>The package tree will mimic the Debian source tree. Diff files should
>>not be gziped. Other than that minor change, do what Debian does.
>>http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/dists/stable/main/source/
>Wouldn't it be a good idea to have
Mike Noyes wrote:
>
> The package tree will mimic the Debian source tree. Diff files should
> not be gziped. Other than that minor change, do what Debian does.
> http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/dists/stable/main/source/
>
Wouldn't it be a good idea to have a default way of building packages,
> On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Eric Wolzak wrote:
>
> > Hello all.
> > Allthough it probably isn't a tremendous memory saver, I couldn't
> > accept that busybox tar didn't function due to the problem with the
> > exclude files.
>
> Every bit - and byte - counts. =)
>
> > Tested with ash (from oxygen ,
On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Eric Wolzak wrote:
> Hello all.
> Allthough it probably isn't a tremendous memory saver, I couldn't
> accept that busybox tar didn't function due to the problem with the
> exclude files.
Every bit - and byte - counts. =)
> Tested with ash (from oxygen , linux 2.4.3 Busybox
On Sun, 29 Apr 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> There is a new baby in the house so I'm not going to be doing a
> lot in the next week or so...
Heh. Everyone else has taken the good stuff. I suppose you could try
coding and such when you're supposed to be sleeping; I hear that such
events are
11 matches
Mail list logo
