Re: [Leaf-devel] Re: leaf-announce ML

2002-07-31 Thread guitarlynn
I apologize for my absence, I have some personal business that has been taking up most of my time at the present. :-( In light of not catching the entire thread, I will give my 0.02. Most users, especially in a commercial environment are subscribed to the leaf-user and/or leaf-devel mailing lis

Re: [Leaf-devel] Re: leaf-announce ML

2002-07-31 Thread Dan Harkless
Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > "The person making the announcement needs to decide the target audience" > > _is_ more vague than "security advisories should be posted to > > leaf-announce". > > You keep returning to security advisories. I'm talking about > announcements. In my mind t

Re: [Leaf-devel] Re: leaf-announce ML

2002-07-31 Thread Mike Noyes
Dan, We're not communicating well. I'll try to explain this to the best of my ability. On Wed, 2002-07-31 at 20:00, Dan Harkless wrote: > > Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > That is not what I had in mind. The person making the announcement needs > > > > to decide the target audienc

Re: [Leaf-devel] Re: leaf-announce ML

2002-07-31 Thread Dan Harkless
Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > That is not what I had in mind. The person making the announcement needs > > > to decide the target audience. Our mailing lists reach a different set > > > of users than our web site. > > > > I think you're making the criteria more vague and complicat

Re: [Leaf-devel] Re: leaf-announce ML

2002-07-31 Thread Mike Noyes
On Tue, 2002-07-30 at 21:46, Dan Harkless wrote: > Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I suspect what you had in mind when you said "and/or" was that important > > > stuff, including, but not limited to, security advisories, should go to > > > leaf-announce, and less important stuff, like