Re: [leaf-devel] support for pcengines hardware

2003-10-05 Thread Erich Titl
Eric Eric Spakman wrote the following at 19:44 05.10.2003: Erich, It's indeed a little weird and I never saw it before (maybe I just didn't notice it before) Anyway, I have a kernel, modules.lrp and updated /etc/init.d/hwclock. hwclock ?? watchdog The kernel and modules.lrp can be used with eith

Re: [leaf-devel] support for pcengines hardware

2003-10-05 Thread Erich Titl
Eric A bit of analysis on this snippet: bsetup.s: Assembler messages: bsetup.s:2393: Warning: value 0x37ff truncated to 0x37ff >> ramdisk_max:.long (-(0xC000)-(128 << 20))-1 # (Header version 0x0203 or later) this results in a value of: 37FF which in a lon

Re: [leaf-devel] support for pcengines hardware

2003-10-05 Thread Erich Titl
Erich Eric Spakman wrote the following at 15:13 02.10.2003: Erich, > > Funny, what compiler version are you using? > GCC-2.95, but I compiled it from within VMware. I will try a recompile with a "real" computer. I compile on a 'real' computer, although not with its native compiler. Here are m

[leaf-devel] kernel hardening

2003-10-05 Thread S Mohan
I know Bering is patched for grsecurity. Is this complementary or a replacement for Openwall hardening patches? Any security guru around to compare and list what each of these provide and if found complementary, can we not implement all of them? Regards Mohan -