On 6/15/2011 3:52 PM, Erich Titl wrote:
> Hi Victor
>
> on 15.06.2011 01:41, Victor McAllister wrote:
>> On 6/14/2011 3:21 PM, Erich Titl wrote:
>>> Hi everybody
>>>
> ...
>
>>
>> I see 2 minor problems in webconf. Probably the lwp files need to be
>> updated to fit Bering 4.0.
>>
>> 1. Active conn
Hi Victor
on 15.06.2011 01:41, Victor McAllister wrote:
> On 6/14/2011 3:21 PM, Erich Titl wrote:
>> Hi everybody
>>
...
>
> I see 2 minor problems in webconf. Probably the lwp files need to be
> updated to fit Bering 4.0.
>
> 1. Active connections reports
> cannot open /proc/net/ip_conntrack
Hi KP
on 15.06.2011 19:51, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 15. Juni 2011, 00:21:12 schrieb Erich Titl:
>> Hi Folks
>>
>> testing some of the webconf enabled tools I found that some paths have
>> changed, particularly traceroute, which used to be a package on it's
>> own, now it appears to be
Am Mittwoch, 15. Juni 2011, 00:21:12 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi Folks
>
> testing some of the webconf enabled tools I found that some paths have
> changed, particularly traceroute, which used to be a package on it's
> own, now it appears to be a busybox applet. It used to be at /usr/sbin,
> now it i
Am Dienstag, 14. Juni 2011, 21:59:49 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi Folks
>
> Webconf right now is handled like any other package, but unfortunately
> this is not the case as there is no monolithic webconf tarball on the
> net which can just be fetched, configured and compiled (and is updated
> at inter
