facing the prospect of "upgrading" to a much larger
and more complex distribution, although I have been more interested in
Alpine Linux than an actual mounted-disk-filesystem Debian install.
--
John Keith Hohm
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I think it is supposed to be
http://www.ssi.bg/~ja (ssi not ddi)
--^^^
John Wittenberg
- Original Message -
From: "Eric B Kiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 8:26 AM
Subject: RE: [leaf-devel] Re:
.
- and updates my /etc/hosts[3]
Eh, I got tired of looking up the addr every time and this was a fun
little hack :)
John
[1] (echo address="$7"; echo "$0") | /usr/bin/gpg --clearsign | \
/bin/mail -s "$7" pppcycle
[2] An overzealous admin at work too
On Wed, 14 Aug 2002, David Douthitt wrote:
> > You'll usually find an NTP server close by.
>
> That's interesting!
>
> However, the NTP documentation stresses the need to get permission
> first - and all of the docs list whether permission is required or not.
> It's unfortunate that people don
rance that your code will
live as long it's useful enough to somebody willing to maintain it.
Perhaps you'd prefer "Shared Source"? ... Didn't think so.
John
[1] Up to the cost of distribution.
[2] Pointing requestors to the upstream source is NOT good enough. The
distributo
http://www.stunnel.org/
This project interests me also. One note, stunnel -also- uses the OpenSSL
crypto libs. If those were shared between stunnel and ssh, you could save
a bit of space.
John
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber In
--- Jacques Nilo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Next contributions under preparation:
> 3/ PPoE configuration (Eric)
I anxiously await! :-)
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Sports - live college hoops coverage
http://sports.yahoo.com/
#x27;ve been running LRP 2.9.[3 or 4] for over a year now
and am a bit out of touch with some of the newer offerings, but that
should change RSN(tm) when "the domino upgrade"[1] occurs.
John
[1] Webserver gets all new hardware, router gets the webserver's processor
(P233mmx) and me
On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, David Douthitt wrote:
> What version of OpenSSH is being used in LEAF projects?
I run and older version of LRP that returns the following string:
SSH-1.5-1.2.26
If I interpret everything correctly this should be OK, but I should really
upgrade it anyway.
> It's a good thi
On Fri, 19 Oct 2001, George Metz wrote:
> Basically, the local root exploit involves using newgrp - with setuid bit
> set - and ptrace to actually cause a root shell to spawn. LRP 2.9.8 and
> variations most likely do not contain this binary; I know that my 2.9.8
> setup doesn't. This IS somethin
e a tulip based card. I'm not well versed enough in Linux or
Eigherstein to troubleshoot any further than this. Sorry.
John-Paul
___
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
mmmmm), etc.
... So, who's building cableisp.lrp?
John
___
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
glibc-5.2-2.0.7.2
compat-libs-5.2-2
$
They're from RedHat 6.2 but still work on a 2.4.2 and glibc-2.2.2 box.
Yes, even C++ (and STL WooHoo!) works.
The important part is the "5.2" piece.
John
PS - Now if only we can teach those ODS boys
You had it easy.
I used to load programs from audio cassettes with my ZX81.
I was a power user though, I had a 16k RAM pack.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David
> Douthitt
> Sent: 17 July 2001 11:01
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subjec
H6.2 box and forgot to
verify that against my LRP box.
John
ptst.sh
rage this work from a mainstream distribution and speed our "time
> to solution". I really don't want to try to create or maintain a
> complete, from the ground up distribution...it seems like too much
> duplication of existing work.
s draft is good and should serve to limit the damage of
otherwise unfettered reporters (ZDNet fanatics, Slashdot Anonymous
Cowards, et. al :)).
So who's publicity do you want? :)
John
___
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
17 matches
Mail list logo
