Hi Erich;
Am Samstag, 27. Mai 2017, 20:05:50 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi KP
>
> Am 27.05.2017 um 19:15 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
> > Hi all;
> >
> > the recent discussions about ntpd failing on i686 SMP and patching it,
> > required to test the proposed patch wit
Hi all;
the recent discussions about ntpd failing on i686 SMP and patching it,
required to test the proposed patch with uClibc-ng 1.0.24.
The most visible change when building our packages with uClibc-ng 1.0.24 was
the deletion of RPC support in uClibc-ng.
A replacement is libtiprpc with a
Am Donnerstag, 6. April 2017, 18:21:34 schrieb Andrew:
> Hi all.
>
> It seems like syslinux i LEAF becomes broken - I can't make flash
> bootable with it. I've got 'Error converting to codepage 850 Success'
> error, IMHO it's related to uClibc-ng libiconv.
>
> Anybody tried to make bootable disk
Hi Andrew;
Am Donnerstag, 6. April 2017, 18:21:34 schrieb Andrew:
> Hi all.
>
> It seems like syslinux i LEAF becomes broken - I can't make flash
> bootable with it. I've got 'Error converting to codepage 850 Success'
> error, IMHO it's related to uClibc-ng libiconv.
>
> Anybody tried to make
Am Samstag, 28. Januar 2017, 10:04:59 schrieb Andrew:
> On 28.01.2017 03:30, kp kirchdoerfer wrote:
> > Hi Andrew;
> >
> > Am Freitag, 27. Januar 2017, 20:55:15 schrieb Andrew:
> >> Hi.
> >>
> >> I've fixed perf, it should be built now.
>
> system passwd file. Which may not correspond to platform passwd...
Do you have an (example) package you refer to?
kp
> On 15.01.2017 18:35, kp kirchdoerfer wrote:
> > Hi all;
> >
> > I've committed a 4.9.(3) kernel to master for review.
> >
> > While I be
Hi Erich;
Am Sonntag, 15. Januar 2017, 20:08:59 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi KP
>
> Am 15.01.2017 um 16:35 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
> > Hi all;
> >
> > I've committed a 4.9.(3) kernel to master for review.
> >
> > While I believe we should wait for an off
Hi all;
I've committed a 4.9.(3) kernel to master for review.
While I believe we should wait for an official new LTS kernel (probably 4.10),
upgrading the kernel to 4.9 made me aware of missing and failing packages
(ipt-netflow, igb,...), the only remaining package to fail is perf.lrp. And
Hi Joern;
Am Dienstag, 3. Januar 2017, 11:32:03 schrieb Jørn Eriksen:
> Hello there,
>
> It seams also that 6.0.x has issues with DNAT when using Shorewall. Not
> sure as to all the sub-modules involved - Tom belived is was due to
> issues with
> xt_nat
> nf_nat
> nf_nat_ipv4
I've started a
Hi Erich;
can you pls explain, what we do have expect with the post_upgrade branch and
how to test it?
If all goes well, which branch do you want it to merged with?
kp
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one
Hi all,
Yves pointed me to BFG Repo-Cleaner
(https://rtyley.github.io/bfg-repo-cleaner/)
to shrink our Pagackes repo.
After a lot of testing it has been time to finally make the step to push a
shrinked version to our git repo.
The packages repository has been reduced from 11GB to 2GB.
It is
Hi Andrew;
Am Samstag, 29. Oktober 2016, 20:12:11 schrieb Andrew:
> hi.
>
> about versioning:
>
> The current proposed translation is:
>
> 5.2.8 -> 52800
> 6.0.0 -> 6
> 6.0.0-minorfix -> 60001
> 6.0.1-beta1 -> 60010
> 6.0.1-rc-1 -> 60020
> 6.0.1 -> 60100
Hi Gents;
I've created a new branch maint-5.2, containing previous maint (5.2.x ) with
the purpose to commit fixes to 5.2.x if necessary, and merged master into maint
(now 6.0.x).
maint should be for fixes and changes for the 6.0.x series.
master is open for development >= 6.1.x
Andrew now is
Am Montag, 3. Oktober 2016, 10:41:05 schrieb Andrew:
> On 02.10.2016 23:37, Erich Titl wrote:
> > Hi Andrew
> >
> > Am 02.10.2016 um 19:58 schrieb Andrew:
> >> On 02.10.2016 20:45, Erich Titl wrote
> >>
> > :...
> > :
> >>> We need to find out if this is an issue for the majority of our users.
>
Am Sonntag, 2. Oktober 2016, 19:48:21 schrieb Andrew:
> On 02.10.2016 19:36, kp kirchdoerfer wrote:
> > Hi;
> >
> > Am Sonntag, 2. Oktober 2016, 19:29:37 schrieb Andrew:
> >> Hi.
> >>
> >> Built-in drivers have much less parameters. For ex., inter
Hi;
I've had some spare time and was looking at what is ahead .
I've updated for testing uclibc-ng to 1.0.18 (which seems about 100 kb
smaller) and kernel 4.7.6 (which seems about 100 kb larger).
A few packages are failing to compile - notably ipt-netflow (looking into the
src repository it
Hi Andrew;
I saw you committed new linux-headers to toolchain.
Just out of interest, has there been anythin wrong with the tarball I
committed a few days ago, and if so what have I done wrong?
I did
#./buildtool.pl headers linux
#cd headers/include
#tar cvfJ
o, on beta release we should also freeze uClibc-ng version for this
> branch.
Agreed.
kp
> 27.07.2016 20:03, kp kirchdoerfer пишет:
> > Hi all;
> >
> > I've comitted changes to support the linux 4.4.x kernel for raspberry pi
> > boards rev 1.
> > While the raspber
Hi all;
I've comitted changes to support the linux 4.4.x kernel for raspberry pi
boards rev 1.
While the raspberry pi 1 was mainly a proof-of-concept, we now support all the
platforms that we did with 5.2.x.
With the changes for rpi rev 1, we do have an example how to support booting
Am Samstag, 7. Mai 2016, 17:59:55 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi Folks
>
> I tried to look into the init bug, just to run into one with the build
> environment
>
> mega@leafbuilder64:~/leaf/devel/bering-uclibc$ git branch
>maint
> * master
>new-initrd
>new_upgrade
>
Hi Erich;
Am Montag, 11. April 2016, 21:24:53 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi KP
>
> Am 11.04.2016 um 15:39 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
> > Am Samstag, 9. April 2016, 14:23:31 schrieb Erich Titl:
>
>
> >> Need to look into linuxrc, where this should be umounted. As I
Am Samstag, 9. April 2016, 14:23:31 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi KP
>
> Am 09.04.2016 10:44, schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
> > Hi;
> >
> > I've booted LEAF 6.0.0-alpha1 iso image in a vm with an attached (virtual)
> > hd. If the disk is partitioned and formatted i
Am Sonntag, 10. April 2016, 15:49:21 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi KP
>
> Am 10.04.2016 14:55, schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
> > Hi Erich;
>
> ...
>
> >>>> Need to look into linuxrc, where this should be umounted. As I forgot
> >>>> the charger fo
Hi Erich;
Am Sonntag, 10. April 2016, 14:18:34 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi KP
>
> Am 10.04.2016 13:28, schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
> > Hi;
>
> ...
>
> >> Need to look into linuxrc, where this should be umounted. As I forgot
> >> the charger for my other l
Hi;
Am Samstag, 9. April 2016, 14:23:31 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi KP
>
> Am 09.04.2016 10:44, schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
> > Hi;
> >
> > I've booted LEAF 6.0.0-alpha1 iso image in a vm with an attached (virtual)
> > hd. If the disk is partitioned and formatted i
Hi;
I've booted LEAF 6.0.0-alpha1 iso image in a vm with an attached (virtual) hd.
If the disk is partitioned and formatted it will be mounted during boot, but
never umounted.
mount shows
/dev/sda1 on /tmp/tmp.kci8fg type vfat etc
This shouldn't happen.
I suspect the problem is in
Hi Erich;
Am Samstag, 2. April 2016, 13:31:19 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Am 02.04.2016 um 12:00 schrieb Andrew:
> > 02.04.2016 10:48, Erich Titl пишет:
> ...
>
> >> You are right, but this is mostly due to the fact that the webconf
> >> interface does not attract our developers. Maybe the fact that
Hi Erich;
Am Donnerstag, 31. März 2016, 19:00:45 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi KP
>
> Am 31.03.2016 um 17:31 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
> ...>
>
> > The name "hwdetect" is misleading. The more interesting part of hwdetect
> > now is loading modules from /
Am Montag, 28. März 2016, 22:13:37 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Am 27.03.2016 um 18:26 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
> > Am Sonntag, 27. März 2016, 16:03:06 schrieb Erich Titl:
> >> Hi KP
> >>
> >> Am 26.03.2016 um 16:55 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
> >>> H Gen
Am Sonntag, 27. März 2016, 16:03:06 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi KP
>
> Am 26.03.2016 um 16:55 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
> > H Gents;
>
> ...
>
> > At last I changed hwdetect to neglect moddb, and to do not use
> > /var/lib/lrpkg/*.depmod any longer - there is
H Gents;
with the merge of newinitrd-6x into master we do have a simplified logic to
load modules:
either during boot from modules.sqfs and /etc/modules or from an init script
as shorewall does for example.
As long as I've not overlooked something important, I believe there is no need
for
ing geode image, which
IMHO does not.
Eventually we'll add an image for WRAP.
kp
>
>
> On 15. mars 2016 18:03, Erich Titl wrote:
> > Am 15.03.2016 um 17:48 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
> > ...
> >
> >>> That is fine. But t
Am Dienstag, 15. März 2016, 17:32:55 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi KP
>
> Am 15.03.2016 um 17:28 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
> > Hi Erich;
>
> ...
>
> > Just to be clear I don't argue against a seperate WRAP image, until it's
> > proofed to be outdated by dow
Hi Erich;
Am Dienstag, 15. März 2016, 16:38:15 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi KP
>
> Am 15.03.2016 um 16:17 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
> ...
>
> > Hi Erich;
> >
> > what's the difference between the alix specific kernel and the geode
> > kernel?
> Tha ALIX ke
Am Montag, 14. März 2016, 14:15:30 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi Folks
>
> I am trying to build a specific kernel for the ALIX board, but I am
> failing configuring the CS553x ATA driver into the kernel, e.g. the
> driver can be enabled as a module but menuconfig does not allow it to be
> compiled
Am Mittwoch, 9. März 2016, 12:38:05 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi Folks
>
> I have successfully installed new-initrd-6.x on my WRAP testbed. This
> system does not have neither moddb nor initmod anymore.
>
> Here a few numbers to compare it to the current master branch. Master is
> alpha1,
Sorry, another response
Am Montag, 7. März 2016, 20:26:58 schrieb Andrew:
> Maybe we should just mount storage till hostapd will start?
And what happens if hostpad isn't loaded at all?
kp
--
Transform Data into
Am Montag, 7. März 2016, 20:26:58 schrieb Andrew:
> Maybe we should just mount storage till hostapd will start?
Will hostapd really load the modules without changes to the init process?
The later is something I try to avoid,cause it will make us to maintain a
different init for hostapd.
Am Montag, 7. März 2016, 11:13:47 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi Folks
>
> Is master supposed to compile completely? To me it looks broken.
>
> mega@leafbuilder:~/leaf/devel/bering-6$ git branch
> * master
> new-initrd-6.x
> mega@leafbuilder:~/leaf/devel/bering-6$ git pull
> remote: Counting
Hi Erich;
Am Freitag, 4. März 2016, 22:50:09 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi Folks
>
> I am trying to rebase new-initrd to master and failing miserably due to
> weird (for me) conflicts. In order to make progress I would like to
> suggest to clean up master in a way to be at least consistent with the
>
Am Montag, 8. Februar 2016, 13:20:07 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi KP
>
> Just to make it more clear
>
> Am 07.02.2016 um 14:09 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
> > Hi;
>
> ..
>
> > I don't think we can't make this a valuable decision.
> >
> > Just a
Am Montag, 8. Februar 2016, 18:32:07 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi KP
>
> Am 08.02.2016 um 18:26 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
> ...
>
> > You may analyze ppp/pppoe instead, where /var/lib/lrpkg/*.depmod provides
> > the necesssry modules and therefor requires n
Hi;
Am Mittwoch, 3. Februar 2016, 20:03:19 schrieb Andrew:
> Hi.
>
> 03.02.2016 17:44, kp kirchdoerfer пишет:
> > Hi all;
> >
> > I'll try to summarize the current and proposed status of loading modules
> > as
> > this raises questions.
> >
&g
Hi all;
I'll try to summarize the current and proposed status of loading modules as
this raises questions.
Pls correct me whereelse needed if I missed something or got it wrong.
This summary is based on 5.2.x, master and new-initrd-6x branch
A) The current status
At the time we do have
Am Donnerstag, 14. Januar 2016, 09:49:05 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi Folks
>
> In my effort to port new-initrd to master I looked at the linux directory
>
> Why do we have config files for 4.1 and 4.4 plus the corresponding tarballs?
> Shouldn't we make the config files release agnostic?
It is
Hi Erich;
Am Sonntag, 10. Januar 2016, 11:18:09 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi KP
>
> Am 10.01.2016 um 08:40 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
> > Am Samstag, 9. Januar 2016, 00:26:57 schrieb Erich Titl:
> >> Hi KP
> >>
> >> ...
> >> * update lightt
Hi all
just a short note that 6.0 is making progress.
Whilst I'm running the gcc 5.3.0, uClibc-ng 1.0.10 toolchain for about a week,
this mail is send via a LEAF router with kernel version 4.4-rc8.
kp
--
Site24x7
Am Samstag, 9. Januar 2016, 00:26:57 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi KP
>
> ...
> * update lighttpd to 1.4.39
>
> Is there a benefit in using lighthttpd over mini_httpd? If so, should we
> drop mini_httpd?
While it's still small it's more like a full-fledged webserver and more
configuration options.
Am Freitag, 1. Januar 2016, 23:18:01 schrieb Andrew:
> Hi.
>
> It seems like there's troubles with parallel compilation. I thought that
> it was due to building all and utils in one make call. I've committed
> changes but forgot to push it. Try now. If it'll fail again (it may run
> OK but may
Happy New Year to all!
Am Donnerstag, 31. Dezember 2015, 12:23:39 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi KP
>
> Am 30.12.2015 um 20:11 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
> > Erich;
>
> ..
>
> > Looking at the busybox documentation, it seems it does support handling of
> > LAB
Hi Andrew;
just tried to build toolchain with uclibc-ng, but ifailed the error
AR cr libc/libc_so.a
STRIP -x -R .note -R .comment libc/libc_so.a
AR cr libc/libc_so.a
i486-unknown-linux-uclibc-ar: libc/libc_so.a: Error reading
libc_multiple_threads.oS: File truncated
...?
kp
Erich;
Am Dienstag, 29. Dezember 2015, 12:52:20 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi KP
>
> Am 28.12.2015 um 21:12 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
> > Hi Erich;
>
> ...>>
>
> >> It requires a different busybox. The current one does not provide findfs.
> >
> >
Am Mittwoch, 23. Dezember 2015, 15:30:53 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi Andrew
>
> Am 23.12.2015 um 12:22 schrieb Andrew:
> > It seems like it was dropped by unknown reason, so it should be enabled.
>
> Well, apparently nobody noticed, so I doubt it is used at all.
>
> cheers
>
> ET
Hi Erich
Hi Erich;
Am Montag, 28. Dezember 2015, 19:59:45 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi KP
>
> Am 28.12.2015 um 17:23 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
> > Am Mittwoch, 23. Dezember 2015, 15:30:53 schrieb Erich Titl:
> >> Hi Andrew
>
> ...
>
> > /lib/libuuid.so.1.3.0 and i
Hi Erich;
Am Montag, 28. Dezember 2015, 20:55:39 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi KP
>
> Am 28.12.2015 um 20:43 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
> > Hi Erich;
> >
> > Am Montag, 28. Dezember 2015, 19:59:45 schrieb Erich Titl:
> >> Hi KP
> >>
> >> Am
Hi Erich;
Am Montag, 14. Dezember 2015, 12:02:08 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi Folks
>
> As the old ipsec.lrp has been changed to strongswan.lrp, did anyone
> follow up with checking and renaming ipsec.lwp? Remember my suggestion
> to include the webconf files in the packages :-)
No I didn't.
I
Am Mittwoch, 16. Dezember 2015, 18:28:18 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi KP
>
> Am 16.12.2015 um 16:18 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
> > Am Mittwoch, 16. Dezember 2015, 16:03:44 schrieb Erich Titl:
> >> Hi Folks
> >>
> >> I believe this is inhere
Am Mittwoch, 16. Dezember 2015, 16:03:44 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi Folks
>
> I believe this is inherently wrong
>
> ./iscsi/buildtool.mk
> echo $(ESCKEY) "isofs\nvfat" > $(INITRD_TARGET_DIR)/boot/etc/modules
> echo $(ESCKEY) "ext4" >> $(INITRD_TARGET_DIR)/boot/etc/modules
>
> This gets
Am Montag, 14. Dezember 2015, 15:59:38 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi Folks
>
> I am trying to understand a dependency of hdsupp to libsmartcols. I see
> the libsmartcols package in the repository, but it does not appear to be
> present in the sources.
>
> mega@leafbuilder:~/leaf/devel/bering-uclibc$
Hi;
I've made a full build with the upcoming kernel 4.4 and the "usual suspects"
fail to build:
ipt_netflow
accel-ppp
perf
Maybe someone can have a look into those.
kp
--
Andrew;
any reason we still provide iperf(2) additionally to iperf3?
kp
--
___
leaf-devel mailing list
leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Am Samstag, 12. Dezember 2015, 12:06:26 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Am 12.12.2015 um 01:59 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
> > Am Samstag, 12. Dezember 2015, 01:17:30 schrieb Erich Titl:
> >> Am 11.12.2015 um 21:16 schrieb Andrew:
> >>> I'm not sure that configs are cha
Am Samstag, 12. Dezember 2015, 01:17:30 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Am 11.12.2015 um 21:16 schrieb Andrew:
> > I'm not sure that configs are changed...
>
> Yes, I know, but the config headers for sure, if they were built with
> 'make oldconfig'. And I don't know if there were any new options
>
Am Sonntag, 22. November 2015, 00:53:48 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi KP
>
> Weitergeleitete Nachricht
> Betreff: [leaf:bering-uclibc] New commit by kapeka
> Datum:Sat, 21 Nov 2015 19:26:39 +
> Von: LEAF Linux Embedded Appliance Framework Git repository
>
Hi Erich;
Am Mittwoch, 28. Oktober 2015, 14:40:50 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi KP
>
> You lifted wpasupplicant to 2.5 now it does not appear to compile.
>
> Could you tell me the rationale for
>
> .source:
> - zcat $(SOURCE_TARBALL) | tar -xvf -
> + $(BT_SETUP_BUILDDIR) -v
I'll re-check it.
>
> 14.10.2015 21:02, kp kirchdoerfer пишет:
> > Hi Andrew;
> >
> > rebuilding from scratch fails with an error
> >
> > libxt_ratelimit.c:28:21: fatal error: xtables.h: file not found
> >
> > #include
> >
> > A pr
Hi Erich;
Am Donnerstag, 15. Oktober 2015, 08:27:56 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi KP
>
> > I also _believe_ , that integration of apkg -u into the upgrade script
> > will be easier to accomplish the then smaller changes and more helpful,
> > than reinvent apkg and configdb.
>
> I have been thinking
Hi Andrew;
rebuilding from scratch fails with an error
libxt_ratelimit.c:28:21: fatal error: xtables.h: file not found
#include
A problem in kernel configs?
Can you pls doublecheck?
ths kp
--
Am Dienstag, 13. Oktober 2015, 16:49:04 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Am 13.10.2015 um 16:25 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
> > Hi Erich;
>
> ...
>
> > So it has been stable from 2002 until 2012, and again three years since
> > last change. Or it has there has been only one ch
Hi Erich;
Am Dienstag, 13. Oktober 2015, 14:26:14 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi Folks
>
> What is the reason for the introduction of the /etc/ez-ipupd directory?
The change has been made in 2012 (somewhere in 4.3.x AFAIK) and for the
purpose to "allow ezipupd to manage multiple configurations in
HI Erich;
Am Samstag, 10. Oktober 2015, 13:08:17 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi KP
>
> Am 10.10.2015 um 03:20 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
> > Hi Erich;
>
> ...
>
> > This does not happen, if one adds a new etc.lrp with "apkg -u", where
> > changes betwee
Hi Erich;
Am Mittwoch, 7. Oktober 2015, 17:05:09 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi
>
> Bad Karma, but I found the reason myself :-(
Sorry for late response, have been on holidays last week :)
> Am 07.10.2015 um 15:01 schrieb Erich Titl:
> > Hi KP
> >
> > you apparently had the same failure about 2
Hi Erich;
Am Sonntag, 4. Oktober 2015, 22:23:12 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi Folks
>
> I am a bit puzzled how I should proceed with stuff I am doing in maint.
> I would like to have my contributions going into it, but I am constantly
> being thrown out of sync by what I would call intrusive changes
Am Mittwoch, 30. September 2015, 17:32:40 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi KP
>
> Am 30.09.2015 um 16:40 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
> > Hi Erich;
> >
> > Am Dienstag, 29. September 2015, 20:30:42 schrieb Erich Titl:
> >> Hi Folks
> >>
> >> I looked at
Am Mittwoch, 30. September 2015, 18:56:15 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Am 30.09.2015 um 18:30 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
> > Am Mittwoch, 30. September 2015, 17:32:40 schrieb Erich Titl:
> >> Hi KP
> >>
> >> Am 30.09.2015 um 16:40 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
> >
Am Mittwoch, 30. September 2015, 08:58:17 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi Tom
>
> Am 30.09.2015 um 03:36 schrieb Tom Eastep:
> > On 9/29/2015 3:59 PM, Erich Titl wrote:
> >> Hi Tom
> >>
> >> Am 30.09.2015 um 00:34 schrieb Tom Eastep:
> >> ...
> >>
> >>> AUTOHELPERS=Yes doesn't cause helpers to be
Am Montag, 28. September 2015, 19:08:32 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Am 28.09.2015 um 17:48 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
> > Hello Erich;
> >
> > Am Sonntag, 27. September 2015, 13:55:34 schrieb Erich Titl:
> >> Hi KP
> >> I checked the contents of the 5_2 director
Hi Erich;
Am Dienstag, 29. September 2015, 20:30:42 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi Folks
>
> I looked at ma newly installed system and it looks like the patch I
> wrote to fully enable atheros wireless chips was not applied to the
> kernel modules.
>
> Please advise
Lokks like it has been lost
Am Mittwoch, 30. September 2015, 17:32:40 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi KP
>
> Am 30.09.2015 um 16:40 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
> > Hi Erich;
> >
> > Am Dienstag, 29. September 2015, 20:30:42 schrieb Erich Titl:
> >> Hi Folks
> >>
> >> I looked at
Hi Erich;
Am Dienstag, 29. September 2015, 17:21:12 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi Andrew
>
> How do I override the module save lock in 5.2. This is just a bloody PIA
Should be default, but could be that you have some leftover from beta
versions...??
You may add to leaf.cfg
# SaveModules
Hi Erich;
Am Montag, 28. September 2015, 18:51:33 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi KP
>
> Am 28.09.2015 um 16:16 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
> > HI Erich;
>
> ...
>
> > Yes; files are identical with he released images as you requested.
> > Please do.
> >
> &g
HI Erich;
Am Montag, 28. September 2015, 11:21:10 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi KP
>
> Am 26.09.2015 um 18:57 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
> > Hi Erich;
> >
> > Am Samstag, 26. September 2015, 17:05:56 schrieb Erich Titl:
> >> Hi KP
> >>
> >> Am
Hello Erich;
Am Sonntag, 27. September 2015, 13:55:34 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi KP
> I checked the contents of the 5_2 directory this morning using
> build_upgrade
>
> running build_upgrade with parameters 5.2.x 5_2
while this is fine for testing, we'll need more work for a comprehensive
Am Samstag, 26. September 2015, 16:31:21 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
> Am Samstag, 26. September 2015, 16:23:12 schrieb Erich Titl:
> > Hi KP
>
> > I installed a system with the files published at 5_2, here a few things:
> Too bad, mails crossed
BTW: Do you have subscribed to l
Hi Erich;
Am Donnerstag, 24. September 2015, 13:08:14 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi KP
>
> Am 22.09.2015 um 18:27 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
> > In 5.2 a major target will be to finally get Erich's update mimic up and
> > running
>
> A few questions
>
> - What is
Am Samstag, 26. September 2015, 16:23:12 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi KP
>
> I installed a system with the files published at 5_2, here a few things:
Too bad, mails crossed
kp
--
Hi Erich;
Am Samstag, 26. September 2015, 17:05:56 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi KP
>
> Am 26.09.2015 um 16:30 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
> > Hi Erich;
> >
> > Am Donnerstag, 24. September 2015, 13:08:14 schrieb Erich Titl:
> >> Hi KP
> >>
> &
Hi Erich;
Am Montag, 24. August 2015, 13:36:48 schrieb Erich Titl:
Hi KP
...
Yes, there are different preferences, and Erich said it'll be easy to
remove modules.sqfs and use of moddb.lrp though it'll reuire the new
config option in leaf.cfg.
I still don't see why. The config
Am Freitag, 21. August 2015, 22:09:48 schrieb Erich Titl:
Hi Andrew
Am 21.08.2015 um 16:17 schrieb Andrew:
21.08.2015 16:29, Erich Titl пишет:
..
Upgrade does this automagically, maybe not in _all_ circumstances but
I tested it with a variety of drivers. And then, in reality you only
HI all;
maybe we can make a step backwards in this discussion and can think about my
proposal to reduce the pain:
The whole pb started here AFAIK:
Modules that are copied manually, should be saved. Modules that are
loaded from squashfs aren't added to moddb.tgz to reduce it's size.
Now we
Am Donnerstag, 20. August 2015, 21:25:36 schrieb Andrew:
20.08.2015 20:40, kp kirchdoerfer пишет:
HI all;
maybe we can make a step backwards in this discussion and can think about
my proposal to reduce the pain:
The whole pb started here AFAIK:
Modules that are copied manually
Am Montag, 17. August 2015, 21:35:07 schrieb Erich Titl:
Am 17.08.2015 um 17:57 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
Hi Erich;
Am Montag, 17. August 2015, 10:32:29 schrieb Erich Titl:
Hi KP
Am 16.08.2015 um 18:40 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
Am Sonntag, 16. August 2015, 19:23:07 schrieb Andrew
Am Sonntag, 16. August 2015, 19:23:07 schrieb Andrew:
If no option UPDATE_MODDB is in leaf.cfg nor in kernel cmdline -
behavior is same as earlier (modules that were probed from squash aren't
stored in moddb.
Earlier behaviour has been to save to moddb. We should preserve that.
Anyway, last
Hi Erich;
Am Donnerstag, 30. Juli 2015, 22:27:35 schrieb Erich Titl:
Hi KP
Am 30.07.2015 um 19:18 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
As I said above, default should be seamless.
How would you do that? Îf there are any parameters needed, they have to
be introduced. What about upgrading
Hi Erich;
Am Mittwoch, 29. Juli 2015, 10:01:42 schrieb Erich Titl:
Hi
Am 25.07.2015 um 18:15 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
...
Ok, I'll try to add option to init/hwdetect util in some days. I think
that by default we shouldn't save probed modules to moddb.
What about this one?
Do you
Am Mittwoch, 29. Juli 2015, 10:06:59 schrieb Erich Titl:
Hi KP
Am 26.07.2015 um 17:09 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
Hi Andrew;
Am Samstag, 25. Juli 2015, 19:32:10 schrieb Andrew:
Hi.
I'll try to add it at this weekend.
I've updated config.lrp and initrd.lrp and it seems to work
Hi Erich;
Am Donnerstag, 30. Juli 2015, 18:12:34 schrieb Erich Titl:
Hi KP
Am 30.07.2015 um 15:51 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
Hi Erich;
Am Mittwoch, 29. Juli 2015, 10:01:42 schrieb Erich Titl:
Hi
Am 25.07.2015 um 18:15 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
...
Ok, I'll try to add option
to moddb.lrp, it seems modules saved in
moddb.lrp are not loaded (modules.sqfs has been deleted/removed).
In addition we should make shure for updates that modules.sqfs overwrites
moddb.lrp - if modules.sqfs is available, do not load moddb.lrp
kp
25.07.2015 19:15, kp kirchdoerfer пишет:
Hi Andrew
Hi Andrew;
Am Samstag, 4. Juli 2015, 16:00:24 schrieb Andrew:
04.07.2015 15:45, kp kirchdoerfer пишет:
Am Samstag, 4. Juli 2015, 15:31:40 schrieb Andrew:
04.07.2015 15:14, kp kirchdoerfer пишет:
Hi;
I almost agree with Erich :)
Am Samstag, 4. Juli 2015, 14:56:33 schrieb Andrew
Hi Andrew;
Am Mittwoch, 15. Juli 2015, 00:28:20 schrieb Andrew:
Hi.
I assembled build for 4.1.2 kernel. It works on test box for 2 days,
I'll try to update other boxes to 4.1.2 on this week.
Did it solve your issues?
I've installed 4.1.2 kernel on my router and it works pretty well, and
1 - 100 of 900 matches
Mail list logo
