Re: [Leaf-devel] About the libc threads

2001-05-29 Thread David Douthitt
Arne Bernin wrote: well, i asked on the list (uClibc) some time ago, about compiling stuff like perl or other greater programs, and it seemed that some functions are still missing, and some might not even not implemented (That's one reason why it is smaller). So maybe there is work to do to

Re: [Leaf-devel] About the libc threads

2001-05-27 Thread Ewald Wasscher
Arne Bernin wrote: What is missing right now is thread support. That's for sure ;-) I don't have anthing to add to Pim's post. but seems to go right into that direction, and if it supports enough functions/binaries i would vote for that. It is small and is good supported, although it may not

Re: [Leaf-devel] About the libc threads

2001-05-26 Thread Arne Bernin
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 07:46:37AM +0200, Ewald Wasscher wrote: Arne Bernin wrote: It is not usable for this right now Then can you tell me what needed functionality is missing? well, i asked on the list (uClibc) some time ago, about compiling stuff like perl or other greater

Re: [Leaf-devel] About the libc threads

2001-05-26 Thread Pim van Riezen
On Sat, 26 May 2001, Arne Bernin wrote: What is missing right now is thread support. That's for sure ;-) There are not that many programs which use threads. For the couple that do, porting the essential bits to linuxthreads symantics sounds like not too hard? Writing a simple wrapper for the 9