David:
I agree, there should be no distribution called LEAF,
specifically. But...there *should* be distributions called
(for instance) Maple and Oxygen that were developed by LEAF
contributors.
Essentially, we should distinguish the project name
from the distribution name. So, unl
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 04:45:59PM -0500, David Douthitt scribbled:
> As for a LEAF distribution, I think I would actually shy away from an
> actual "LEAF" image; the concept is good but the literal
> implementation would be bad. Put another way, I wouldn't have any
> problem with "Maple LRP" cre
To me, that is what LRP and its variants are all about: these ARE
distributions, and part of maintaining a distribution is updating
packages, adding features, recompiles, et al.
As for a LEAF distribution, I think I would actually shy away from an
actual "LEAF" image; the concept is good but the
