On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Jack Coates wrote:
> For any one else reaching for the nearest high-speed networking
> textbook, that's equivalent to OC-12. 622 Mbps ATM, or 483 Mbps pure
> throughput after overhead (20% ATM, 3% IP).
Correct me if I'm wrong here Jack, but I was pretty sure that there was
o
For any one else reaching for the nearest high-speed networking
textbook, that's equivalent to OC-12. 622 Mbps ATM, or 483 Mbps pure
throughput after overhead (20% ATM, 3% IP).
--
Jack Coates
Monkeynoodle: It's what's for dinner!
On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Pim van Riezen wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jun 2001
> >P.P.S. what steps have been taken to store and or mirror sourceforge
> >locally should VA Linux go away?
>
> I backup our web site, and the content in the DocManager here:
> http://leaf.sourceforge.net/pub/archives/
>
> SourceForge also backs up all projects regularly. If someone wishes to
make
On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> > >P.P.S. what steps have been taken to store and or mirror sourceforge
> > >locally should VA Linux go away?
> >
> > I backup our web site, and the content in the DocManager here:
> > http://leaf.sourceforge.net/pub/archives/
> >
> > SourceForge
Mike Sensney, 2001-06-13 22:51 -0700
>I think there is no need to do anything. As the expression goes, "Why
>flog a dead horse?" I haven't unsubscribed from the LRP list. There
>isn't any need to. The list is effectively dead. There are a very few
>posters asking LRP questions. Nobody is answering
Morgan Reed, 2001-06-14 01:27 -0400
>To all,
>While I am still willing to sign and send out an open letter, I believe
>it is probably unnecessary.
Morgan,
Thank you for taking the time to write the open letter. You did a great job
late at night for our benefit, and I appreciate it. That said I a
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Sensney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 10:52 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Leaf-devel] Hopefully last thread on LRP and leaving
>
>
> At 01:27 AM 06/14/2001 -0400, Morgan Reed wrote
&
At 01:27 AM 06/14/2001 -0400, Morgan Reed wrote
>To all,
>
>It would appear that the LRP project itself did not get dragged into the mud
>on /. or any of the major Linux sites, so in that sense it would seem Dave's
>actions created nothing more than a tempest in a teapot.
>
>While I am still will
