> > Also, I'm generally interested in 'really thin' servers. The first will
> > probably be a BIND server, which I'd also like to see install straight
from
> > the CD.
> >
> > Charles Steinkuehler
> Hi Charles !
> What are the reasons which make you choose Bind over tinydns if you are
> looking f
as good a division as any, but I think I'd add a distinction:
--
Jack Coates
Monkeynoodle: It's what's for dinner!
On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, David Douthitt wrote:
> This is where I see the two LRP derivatives heading, based on the
> mails from developers, and in other cases, my own view. These are
Charles writes:
> Also, I'm generally interested in 'really thin' servers. The first will
> probably be a BIND server, which I'd also like to see install straight from
> the CD.
>
Me too -- I've got quite a few old systems here that would be useful for
testing something like that. Unfortunately
>
> Also, I'm generally interested in 'really thin' servers. The first will
> probably be a BIND server, which I'd also like to see install straight from
> the CD.
>
> Charles Steinkuehler
Hi Charles !
What are the reasons which make you choose Bind over tinydns if you are
looking for a "really
> This is where I see the two LRP derivatives heading, based on the
> mails from developers, and in other cases, my own view. These are
> LONG views.
>
> Eigerstein:
>
> * Ease of use improvements and focus: boot it and use it
> * Leaner, smaller
> * Further specialized as a router and firewa
