26.05.2010 11:29, Erich Titl пишет:
> Hi Andrew
>
> at 25.05.2010 23:03, Andrew wrote:
>
>>
>>> Is there a chance to make a uniform source for the packages, maybe only
>>> differing in the makefiles and configs?
>>>
>>> cheers
>>>
>>> Erich
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Some of packages need to
26.05.2010 12:30, Erich Titl пишет:
> Hi Andrew
>
> at 26.05.2010 10:48, Andrew wrote:
>
>> 26.05.2010 11:29, Erich Titl пишет:
>>
>>> Hi Andrew
>>>
>>> at 25.05.2010 23:03, Andrew wrote:
>>>
>>>
> Is there a chance to make a uniform source for the packages
At least I think that I fix almost all packages that were fixable by
simple operations (was broken due to paths trouble, or due to need of
small makefile modification), and update some critical-looking packages
(like e2fsprogs). There is one major broken package due to unknown
reason (possibly
Subj.
This cause on my system troubles with initrd package building through
buildall script. Why it was done in that way? Possible it'll be good
(and safe) to remove fakeroot call?
--
__
Hi Andrew,
> This cause on my system troubles with initrd package building through
> buildall script. Why it was done in that way? Possible it'll be good
> (and safe) to remove fakeroot call?
fakeroot (or "real" root) is needed for buildpacket because it needs to
"chown" the files before putting
