Re: [leaf-devel] buildclean kernel

2010-11-04 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Mittwoch, 3. November 2010, 21:36:50 schrieb Andrew: > 03.11.2010 22:08, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: > > Am Mittwoch, 3. November 2010, 20:41:23 schrieb Andrew: > >> 03.11.2010 20:53, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: > >>> Am Mittwoch, 3. November 2010, 18:12:59 schrieb Andrew: > 03.11.2010 18:26, KP Kirc

Re: [leaf-devel] Bering-uClibc4: Status report - snmpd

2010-11-04 Thread davidMbrooke
On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 12:55 +, davidMbrooke wrote: >- I get errors from snmpd like "ioctl 35123 returned -1". This is > because I have "long" interface names for my VLAN interfaces (>8 > characters, e.g. "eth1@eth1"). Seems that the latest version of > SNMPD has a fix for this, so I in

[leaf-devel] Bering-uClibc4: Busybox ntpd configuration question

2010-11-04 Thread davidMbrooke
Hi kp, Quick question about the new Busybox ntpd - is there a lrcfg menu option to edit /etc/default/ntpd ? I can't see one... Some users may want to change the peers, others may want to set NTPDRUN=no in order to run the "proper" ntpd. Thanks, dMb

Re: [leaf-devel] buildclean kernel

2010-11-04 Thread Andrew
04.11.2010 22:32, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: > > Hi Andrew; > > I'd say the "unoptimized" 486 kernel should be the base, but that's > nitpicking. > > ok, I start to get it :)) > > I've managed to build the necessary patch, removed kernel and linux (including > .source by hand) and to rebuild the kernel

Re: [leaf-devel] Bering-uClibc4: Busybox ntpd configuration question

2010-11-04 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Hi dMb; Am Donnerstag, 4. November 2010, 22:16:14 schrieb davidMbrooke: > Hi kp, > > Quick question about the new Busybox ntpd - is there a lrcfg menu option > to edit /etc/default/ntpd ? I can't see one... No there is no lrcfg menu option yet. > Some users may want to change the peers, others